I nullified SCOTUS on Saturday, both the institution and the rulings coming out of it as BVG had zero basis in the Constitution or case law; it is totally devoid of any and all legal standing yet some how it was heard. The reason no person has been able to attack SCOTUS for installing as law what is British and not to be found anywhere in the law of the US? Nobody else had the SCOTUS docket I have. You can never, ever reconcile 11/20/08 with 11/09/09 and you can never reconcile BVG with Susan V Obama as both are identical emergency apps that were to be processed the same but weren't and if the only difference is I do have a case and do have standing and so all law and case law is for me? And Bush has none whatsoever? Then a clerk or a Justice had to commit a crime with full knowing. To make certain I hammered this nail home I lifted the entire first half of my emergency app from BVG verbatim, lol. All I did was remove the names Bush and Gore. Think: If we both received action WHY wasn't Susan V Obama heard in person? WHY WASN’T IT EVEN FILED? Because: I won. I defeated SCOTUS not Bush and not Obama as if you pull out SCOTUS what else falls? ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING BRITISH IN ORIGIN. Hey! Didn’t Obama claim to be a subject of Britain upon his birth on his own website? Didn’t I enter this to SCOTUS in 2007 and 2008 and inform SCOTUS of it? Well, well, well.

1, SCOTUS does not want to admit it is WRONG thus criminal 2, SCOTUS does not want to admit it itself is subject to the Crown and has been since Marshall died and 3, SCOTUS told me: a female victim will never be allowed to argue her own case as then women receive equal protection where now they have only what men buy them or what is arbitrary - what a man decides to 'give' them -  and what even nonexistent in real life. And if you 'give' women equal power and authority? If you give them all of the knolwedge they need ot then claim it? All people have it; Justices and others are no longer untouchable kings. And neither is any world dictator. They’re all very, very touchable. Thus: Don't file it.

So, for all of this time I have been keeping one authority in my back pocket. If you know a few facts of me you should be able to travel in a straight line from Rockford to this 'authority'. Try all compass points and one place should stand out as it's a fact of Susan. 

Another fact I kept in my back pocket until now?

Somebody from inside SCOTUS mailed me a piece of evidence rising to proof; it came to my home about a year ago and I knew what it was as soon as I saw it: Proof of criminal activity inside SCOTUS. So I kept it secret until I had the docket to prove it to The People. The citizens can't access the SCOTUS files; you can only access them if you're heard in person. By acting to enforce it as a default judgment thus forcing Obama and Roberts  -SCOTUS - to produce the original Declaration, Constitution, Marbury V Madison and 19th amendment and so deliver the actual paper commission to me as the withholding of the actual paper now is the injury then I force everyone to acknowledge the Constitution and me plus place all of the documents in one 'venue' so the citizens can all read them – even whatever the clerks wrote in an effort to hide my case from the Justices and so from The People and/or did not even serve upon the Justices.

Something else happened between last week and today: ANOTHER piece of evidence rising to proof came to my home, courtesy of SCOTUS once again and it has to do with ROBERTS exactly. It suggests the clerks criminally withheld my petitions form him and from the other Justices; that they deliberately ruined the documents when summarizing my case and when they should never have even touched my work at all but handed it to a Justice directly. So then, to pit us against SCOTUS and Obama and anybody he appointed I entered the enforcement as separate counts and only named Mullen and the US military in their official capacity thus it is me and the military, The People and the military, versus all of these guys as they are not official. They have no capacity and knew it as early as Feb. of 2007.

It’s not  a lawsuit; there’s zero debate at this point. The one and only person to respond to 09-6777? Kagan and gee, didn’t I exactly name her in Petition 09-6777? Is she going to claim she read Reason #43 and did not know she was reading her own name??? Being mentally ill to this extent and degree makes you unfit if you are now even denying you just read your own exact name and an exact charge but did it over again regardless. I mean, SCOTUS accepted Kagan’s response; is that even remotely legal? Of course not!

Obama and Roberts never once objected to us receiving the award. They never once objected to us receiving the actual paper commission and made it a part of our defense, as how can we possibly defend ourselves and the nation if the original documents are now being withheld from us criminally? If the paper documents become the injury thus your defense you can force them to deliver the actual paper. I alluded to the fact that I will be demanding the delivery of the originals held by the National Achieves not copies. They belong to me, the seat of actual power and authority thus belong to The People; so they go where we go. They do not belong to the corporate seat, a dead institution, but instead to the living Constitution – us. If the seat of constitutionally set power is wherever I am until the Presidential election of 2012 then Obama and Roberts can be forced to deliver them to 1100 Seagate Avenue #101, Neptune Beach, FL. There’s even precedent, as a Jax criminal judge sent me discovery papers asking me to serve them upon the Justices and US military so I wrote back: “Are you sure you want me to ask SCOTUS and the US military to produce the two governing documents upon a motion of discovery??? Legally, do you know what you are doing??? What this then means and is??? If I, Susan, accept delivery of the commission and the Military gives it up???” MARTIAL LAW as it makes me both the President and Chief Justice.

LOOLOLOLOL! I warned SCOTUS so that’s why it floored me when SCOTUS DENIED their existence. You may ask a whole lot of people to produce those documents and even read them out loud but may you ask the US military? You know, they’re not a private police force. And these aren’t private rights. SCOTUS: Are you withholding these same documents, this same commission, from enlisted service members? I say YES as you have now made it impossible for any wronged service member to sue as you totally annihilated chain of command. And if SCOTUS changes the form? Blackstone’s, as the English do not remove kings via a writ or petition but by assassination and/or warfare. Blackstone’s, the British conflict of interest SCOTUS can’t overcome says you can’t remove a king via due process but in the US? It’s called US V Nixon; I fine tuned it by renaming it Susan V Obama and Roberts and In Re Thomas Jefferson.

You must give the military at least one just opportunity to answer and that's impossible if SCOTUS clerks doctored evidence and then did not even hand some of it over...not only could you not access it from the outside via public channels but you wouldn't be able to order anyone to produce what is not there, get it? Every time I entered the Declaration and Constitution somebody refused to file it or then ordered it pulled. And for a year I’ve had proof it is criminal and SCOTUS employees did it, as they know they are not named in the written Constitution. WE are; they aren’t! Like they are going to file and/or produce the original documents not naming them and the power they criminslly assumed? I couldn’t tell anyone I had proof from inside SCOTUS from a SCOTUS employee until I could produce the docket that one can only reconcile with the federal criminal code.  So now not only can't I let some pea brain military clerk admit he knows but will not serve Mullen with the papers but I can't hold the military to what might have been made impossible by federal judges and clerks. We know as fact, absolute fact, some papers were never filed but now it seems as if recent documents weren't served let alone filed and the SCOTUS clerks did it. And Roberts is responsible for those clerks.

So, I went to the 3 'authorities' left one of which is a part of the DOJ and another which is the military but I did it by leveraging us against SCOTUS with Obama. If Susan informs SCOTUS that Obama is not natural born and not legal and neither is any person on the ballot and SCOTUS refuses to inform you is SCOTUS withholding the paper commission from you, the citizen voter, unconstitutionally? Did you fully vest your interest and right by voting? By making an attmept to live out what is impossible to live out, BVG? And if so may I force SCOTUS and Obama to hand over those actual papers as that is Marbury V Madison and it is what John Marshall said you must then do? WE own the actual paper after all. It's our property and WE have the interest then not any titled and/or paid person.

My true belief was, and I’m sure the insider who sent me the proof truly believed this too, that the clerks and Justices would give up and cave to me before it ever came down to me embarrassing the hell out of them via a default judgment. Someday you may ask my secretary of defense as he was on the phone with me when SCOTUS DENIED they ever read the two governing documents and denied that they were subject to that authority; the wheels were turning so fast I became very quiet and he told me that he thought the case was destroying me, lol!

That is the point of law: If overthrow is and SCOTUS did it then you’ve been destroyed and do not know it. It already happened to you, lol! what silent, peaceful protest will ever work then??? BUSH is foreign as CHENEY took it to SCOTUS as nowhere in Gore V FL do you find BUSH as after a President named Clinton falls? Chain of command is it falls to the Veep only in this case GORE missed the boat so all CHENEY did was step up to the plate. If Renhquist hadn’t mistakenly and wrongly heard BVG? Today you would have the Speaker of the House acting as the President. Didn't she try to commandeer a jet for personal use even as if she is the preident? And didn't she act to negotiate with foreign powers in direct violation of the Constitution?

?I knew why it seemed as if Cheney is running the joint - as he was and legally he could. In August of 2007 I then proved it in a complaint using Bush administration officials and Bush‘s own words that named the unconstitutional chain of command as the amendment re succession was meant to assuage Congress. It’s not legal and everyone knew it when it was passed plus the Secretary of the Treasury being third? Even in the supposedly constitutional chains people put forth? Hamilton did that; it should be the SECRETARY OF DEFENSE. DEFENSE, the commission is a part of your defense. Nobody ever stopped to consider how the chain works the other way, if a sitting President falls as the legal assumption is it went forward, to The People, but no one ever countered with: Not if SCOTUS gets its paws on it or Not if The People can't as they have been incapacitated by the injury.

Cheney knew exactly what he was doing; he did actually sit next to Nixon for several years...he would be familiar with US V Nixon. He would know he had to injure women impossibly to succeed and get away with it and nobody ever being the wiser. You do not truly believe Bush Jr. chose Roberts, do you? Karl Rove said: Cheney did it. Obviously.

Another fact I previously withheld? The FBI invoked the Patriot Act against me and then began lying to me and injuring me worse when I directly confronted CHENEY with what I knew about him and what he did.  I told him: I know what you did, why you did it and even how you did it. And I’m telling The People everything I know. The very next time I logged onto a computer? Boom! Only I caught them: A search ‘disappeared’. I searched for something and after I did I went to access it again and it was ‘frozen’ as if that thing did not exist in cyber space. So I outsmarted the FBI: I picked a person I can always find anywhere any time and wrote him a letter; I used a form. Before I hit send I hit back to check the spelling and voila! A “rotten egg”: a little circle that looked like an egg was implanted within the letter; it doesn’t look like a zero or a letter “O”; it looks like a tiny ‘bomb’ or egg. It's solid in color. It’s a tag meant to trace otherwise secure communications. It would then tag everything in the receiver's PC. So I erased it then sent the letter and then I taunted the FBI. I knew it had to be a computer expert trying to harm me in re to the custody case - my brother is a computer science professor -  or the FBI because of Cheney. So I reported the FBI on itself to itself via its internet crime site and then printed out a common, common search term that should have been readily accessible but wasn’t as my searches, my intellectual property, was being seized criminally. The PC was telling me phrases like "peanut butter" had zero results, lol. The FBI was intercepting and then snatching the results of whatever terms I searched. That's wholly unconstitutional and criminal in this unique case. I  printed it out – term not available and/or zero results -  as well as the the FBI internet  crime report and details of my confrontation with Cheney and took that plus my police report and state’s attorney’s report and....entered it to federal court! That’s WHY the Jax bench hates me so much. I brought the wrath of Dick Cheney down on them. Dick Cheney, he’s soooooo scary kids! I said, Oh c’mon, I mean Dick and Bush in the Whitehouse with Gore as the loser and you think God isn’t laughing at you and them?

Then I wrote to the Justices and told them all about it and that they’d be hearing from me soon in the form of an original case as I had them all and for prison time too. They’ll all get actual jail time as I was so diligent when it came to producing and collecting proof not evidence: Unless someone actually drops a rotten egg on you HOW do you know its even a real thing that exists??? It’s not like the FBI advertises all the creepy weapons they employ against The People; to know this stuff you have to be very, very observant and then even a victim of it. Nowhere in the Patriot Act will you find the words “rotten egg”. Who agreed to that? Nobody, not even Congress. Think: You’re right FBI, if Congress doesn’t make you name it then it *might* be legal  - until or unless a citizen catches you as the legal presumption is you don’t have an injury thus a violation of rights or a crime until you have a victim and lucky for The People I reported you to your own self! You directly interfered in a custody case and caused me and my sons direct injury via your actions. I myself ended up with a broken bone and almost got killed, all because of what the FBI did. I reported what is a crime against The People and constitutes treason due to my knowledge of BVG to the FBI’s internet crime reporting site, as the FBI only came to harm me once I acted upon my knowledge of BVG specifically CHENEY.  The FBI never once came after me when I attacked Bush as the FBI knows what I know: CHENEY ascended via BVG and chain of command theory not Bush. Since when did the FBI start working for CHENEY privately? And since when are any of these rights privately held? HA! I was on a LIBRARY owned PC so the FBI violated me and my kids local municipal, county, state and federal and I myself then went and got all of those authorites - individuals - involved in the moment, as it was happening. 

I never told anyone the details of the FBI run in – only what I put on the court record, of what somebody inside SCOTUS sent me ( I only put that on the record as of Saturday)  or one last thing: In 2005 I came to own private, personal knowledge of Joe Biden that makes him unfit to serve. It’s worse than you think as he deliberately engineered a situation in order to hide something from The People and that due to the nature of it no person would ever be able to confront him or if they did that this person would have to violate some sacrosanct rules to do it so wouldn’t. I can and I will. It has to do with Biden deliberately engineering a situation so he could become VICE PRESIDENT exactly thus proves all of this was in the works as early as 2005, with exact people and exact offices being traded. YOU were being traded behind closed doors and as usual the people bragging about it did not realize WHO they were telling – me, Susan. I’m just a dumb broad, remember? So they ran their mouths while I listened and took copious notes as I have a photographic memory – when I choose to use it. What makes it so bad is naming exact offices and people, as if nothing any voter did would ever change it. And if I wasn’t there or didn’t know BVG for what it is then you wouldn’t have the ability. I never would have taken what I heard seriously if I did not understand BVG. You’d never know what actually took place. You’d never know why or how exactly. Thus I kept all of this ‘secret’ until now.

Anybody who actually knows Obama or Biden? Or Cheney? As people? They’re not gonna shoot me, lol.

Incredible, huh? It still makes me shake my head. And it all happened to me. I was there, lol. So:

Either I have mad ESP skills, or I’m the world’s greatest military strategist, or I know logic and reason – law - better than anybody in recent memory, maybe of all people ever. I’d say it’s number two but my Secretary of Defense would object so I’ll claim number three, logic: I truly did resolve Uniformity so it only seems as if its ESP. ANYTHING anybody tries to keep secret you can know if only you know a simple law of this universe related to Uniformity; that is Uniformity. Once you know it? There is no such thing as a secret. you can 'predict' this stuff years in advance. Ready??? This is so funny:

I correctly predicted all of this. What I might write via snail mail isn't necessarily what I'd write via email. You can ask a clerk. In early 2007 I wrote to my clerk, Clayton Higgins; I just reminded him of it when I nullified him. I told him where we get the word “treason” and that in modern day usage it is mainly popular because of a French book, a novel titled “Le Treason (traison) De Clerics” so that treason  is most closely associated with clerics and clerks, historically it was used that way and this book was popular around he turn of the century carrying it into modern usage – as in religion, a state religion - not government; that government use of treason was rare and even nonexistent until we used it in this way. Treason is a word related to kings not Presidents. I said, “If treason is afoot in the US? Take France’s advice: Look at the clerks as they are your first and last line of defense if a court of law not a royal court is your problem.”

He didn’t believe me back then...or did he? ; )

On Satruday I said, Hey Clayton, recall that exact letter? I believe he did recall it and how:

What brain dead clerk opened BVG and passed it on ahead as an original case???  Instead of returning it and telling Bush to abide by USC 1331 as only Gore appeared in an appellate court??? What brain dead clerk and later what brain dead Blackstone loving Justices did not know the only possible legal standing Bush ever had is third party and that’s only if Gore was docketed and heard in person and only if you made law and/or made ex post facto law and so they were being duped by agents of their party, Republicans and Democrats, not by agents of The Constitution, The People???

We should know soon.

Susan.

P.S. Blackstone’s? It’s even funnier than you know as Blackstone’s doesn’t like Obama either and SCOTUS can't tell us they never looked this up, can they? You'd think Blackstone wrote The Constitution they way SCOTUS clings to it like a crutch so SCOTUS can't deny knowing this even if I never said a word:

It is only by examining the 18th century usage and definition of a term that we can ascertain its meaning in the Constitution.  In the 18th century, and at the time of the framing and ratification of the Constitution by the states, the term “natural-born” subject or citizen was always used or defined in such a way as to exclude the child of a British or American girl or woman when that child was born in a foreign country and that child’s father was a foreign citizen.  No 18th century jurist would have thought the term “natural-born” citizen or subject could have been extended to the child of a British or American girl or woman when that child was born in a foreign country and that child’s father was a foreign citizen.

Here is Blackstone’s classic exposition in 1765 of the legal meaning of the term from the Commentaries on the Laws of England.

William Blackstone, Commentaries 1:354, 357–58, 361–62

1765

“Natural-born subjects are such as are born within the dominions of the crown of England, that is, within the ligeance, or as it is generally called, the allegiance of the king; and aliens, such as are born out of it.. . .

“When I say, that an alien is one who is born out of the king’s dominions, or allegiance, this also must be understood with some restrictions. The common law indeed stood absolutely so; with only a very few exceptions: so that a particular act of parliament became necessary after the restoration, for the naturalization of children of his majesty’s English subjects, born in foreign countries during the late troubles. And this maxim of the law proceeded upon a general principle, that every man owes natural allegiance where he is born, and cannot owe two such allegiances, or serve two masters, at once. Yet the children of the king’s embassadors born abroad were always held to be natural subjects: for as the father, though in a foreign country, owes not even a local allegiance to the prince to whom he is sent; so, with regard to the son also, he was held (by a kind of postliminium) to be born under the king of England’s allegiance, represented by his father, the embassador. To encourage also foreign commerce, it was enacted by statute 25 Edw. III. st. 2. that all children born abroad, provided both their parents were at the time of the birth in allegiance to the king,…might inherit as if born in England: and accordingly it hath been so adjudged in behalf of merchants. But by several more modern statutes these restrictions are still farther taken off: so that all children, born out of the king’s ligeance, whose fathers were natural-born subjects, are now natural-born subjects themselves, to all intents and purposes, without any exception; unless their said fathers were attainted, or banished beyond sea, for high treason; or were then in the service of a prince at enmity with Great Britain.”