SCOTUS rehearing 'ghostwriter'

I NEED A GHOSTWRITER...the point of law is lost on SCOTUS plus the clerks obstructed justice by violating the separation of powers and by interfering in a case in which they may not as they are named within the caption and in which they can’t, as they do not possess the necessary human ability as named by Federalist 78. So I need a ghostwriter to then try and get it across to them plus the military as I have a meeting with the joint chiefs on Monday. I do not need this by Monday but would like to be able to tell them it is forthcoming. All anybody needs to do is take the ideas in the following two rough drafts and combine them into a petition to be Reheard. A petition to be reheard is easy to write as it is subject to stricter page limitations, extraordinary and/or intervening circumstances and as you do not need to include all of the other technical crapola. All I need is the body if the petition; someone else’s words may finally ram it though their thick skulls.

The extraordinary and intervening circumstances? The US military and Department of Justice (now that's a joke and a half) is now involved with the US military’s involvement now taking precedent. I’ll write that final sentence my own self.

If someone can and will take a look at my reasoning – it’s in very rough form here - extrapolate the ideas and put it together so that they might realize exactly how bad this is then I’d appreciate it.

Oh, you do not need to write a jurisdictional statement; I included that as I’m reasoning how you can only adjudicate this case within SCOTUS itself or via violence. Once the last office falls there is no use in any other person never petitioning for anything ever again as it is all arbitrary and none of it is our law as SCOTUS VOIDED every sitting officer including their own persons! Dumb, dumb, dumb –DUMB.

I had an idea: If one of you can and will this I can then claim YOU are an extraordinary and intervening circumstance. I can and will clam as I needed a witness you’re it and as I needed the clerks to know I am not alone and others are aware then you had to intervene on my behalf as they steadfastly refused to acknowledge my words at all, that is, w/o any hearing in person they are making the claim my testimony and The Constitution is not the truth!!!

So, how do you tell SCOTUS as I am the authority then there is no other argument than mine? That they are WRONG not in error but WRONG thus have no opinion and so can’t DENY this petition? How do you tell them they can’t DENY The People and the military redress for the violation of fundamental rights – that SCOTUS itself violated so that SCOTUS itself is then GUILTY and RESPONSIBLE for the injury known as foreignization? SCOTUS not only created law, made law thus inserted what is foreign into our Constitution thus killed the Republic via violation of Art. 4 Sec 4. but also is directly responsible for the election and installation of a an actual foreigner into the Office of the Executive.

I tried informing them; will one of you make an attempt? Remember what I have below are only my initial ideas in rough form; I’m trying to incorporate all of it to illustrate the massive pint of law – SCOTUS ISN’T THE LAW – and in this case the clerks can’t summarize the case for the Justices as that is them acting as Justices, as if they have the right to overthrow the constitution. Hey, Marbury V Madison says NOTHING about any CLERKS.

If all of you want to take a stab at it be my guest; if you know a person who can or will help then pass this on. Thanks, and send me any ideas you have even if you can’t ghostwrite for me. LOL! Is it ghostwriting if you claim ownership of it on the title page? No, as that is a partnership.

The clerks might think twice if they knoww other people do know and are willing. As it is they keep telig me I can't do anythign every time they violate my rights...at this point we do not even know if a Justice ever even saw the actual case and as you can never, ever reconcile 11/20/08 with 11/09/09? It's doubtful; more than one person truyl belives no Justice ever read the case or if they even looked at it all they read was whatever the clerk wrote.

BTW: This isWHY it is pointless and futile to keep marchign peacefully as SCOTUS has now breached the peace. You cannot protst peacefully if no peace exsit and instead endmeic doemstic violence is. Everybody who tell me violence is premature is denying the reality of their own life. It may seem as if you have rights but you do not as to have rights under nay manmade sytem? you must first own liberty and liberty is hat SCOTUS and Obama is denying you. Liberty is what BVG denied you thus there is no peace. Actually and legally as I exhuasted the process...you don't need TWO citizens to exhaust the process as I exhuasted every means SCOTUS provides! If they now allow am naentry? All they have doen is breach the peace in a worse fashion, a more severe fasion as no man will ever give birth to a baby thus the interst and right is NEVER his!!! If the porperty right and interest is peoel then the right is a mothers as power, the power to give birth to people, and all moral authority, as all men have unclean hands, is hers. This, the truth or actual reality, should be self-evident!!! Even if the SCOTUS employees can't read they have had sex!!!

Susan.

Here’s what I wrote so far; one is a rough statement of the case as if I am writing a brand new petition and one is closer to the actual form a rehearing takes.

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction is the Supreme Court only and not any lower court as I am challenging at least three case of original jurisdiction, this institution defaulted and so overthrew the two governing documents known as the Declaration and Constitution in the action known as Herbert V Obama, Roberts, Hull and the US, the Justices and clerks of this bench violated the court ruling known as Marbury V Madison wholly by making me the very first citizen denied redress for the violation of a fully vested, constitutionally protected interest and right aka as an injury that the Supreme Court itself is guilty of perpetrating, making me the very citizen deemed to have no constitutionally protected rights by official court decisions thus also violating Blackstone’s, an ‘authority’ this court cites over and over, as this Court refused to create the venue to adjudicate one clause only -natural birth -thus unjustly targeting mothers and their children some of whom are enlisted service members and as USC 1331 is repugnant in this unique case thus it is void.

Also: If every office is now fallen and so the Declaration and Constitution are now overthrown thus this government is dead, and this is directly due to the actions of this court concerning two cases of original jurisdiction, Bush V G and the above mentioned Herbert V Obama, and in both cases this court did not err but ruled wrongly, as in it implicated itself in the crime known as treason and at least one citizen died as a result and they did, then ONLY THE SUPREME COURT CAN AND MAY RESPOND AS ONLY IT CAN ANSWER IF THE CLERKS AND/JUSTICES ARE GUILTY OR NOT.

Finally: The recent denial in regards to Herbert V Obaam, Roberts, hull and the US is not an actual and legal denial as it can’t be or else the Supreme court is violating the very nature of this nation’s existence as a Constitutional republic as well as the nature of its own institution; it constitutes a sitting Chief Justice answer or deciding that he alone is above The constitution as are the other employees of this Court.

In this unique case due to my legal standing and the prior actions of this Court it constitutes nothing less than an order that martial law be enacted with me in charge. It then is an order that finds The People and the military guilty of Bush V G and all of its effects including Obama aka. election 2008 when clearly that is a lie as it is this Court that pled guilty via entering no answer and not hearing the case in person as Marbury says you must this that then is an automatic default not a denial and so martial law it is. This is nothing short of this Court admitting law and order no longer exists in the civilian court system.

SCOTUS can and may violate US law and all known case law including Marbury; it can reason itself out of existence thus granting all power and authority to the People via the US military but it cannot and may not violate my rights and in what seems to be a criminal manner. If it does thus attempting to overthrow The Constitution?

Jurisdiction then is this court only as SCOTUS, namely the named Chief Justice has just made itself the issue and the jurisdiction thus this is yet another constitutional authority case of o.j. SCOTUS itself just decided no other authority, no lower court, exists.

STATEMENT OF CASE

For the very first time ever the Supreme Court encountered a citizen who exhausted the entire process except for this one court. SCOTUS then refused to offer this citizen any actual or legal redress, refused to create the venue to adjudicate one clause only and refused to uphold Marbury in any way at all.

The sitting Chief Justice and the clerks were named and within the caption as by naming the sitting Chief Justice every employee of the Judiciary is named and by naming the sitting President as well every employee of the government is named both state and federal as well as every person who voted for Obama or any candidate on the ballot in 2008 as all are unsafe.

They are unsafe as they did not know the exacting reason Bush V Gore is unconstitutional thus not one person on the ballot could or would accord us safety thus not one could or would fulfill the Oath of Office; they had zero ability to fulfill it as it exactly reads “I will preserve, protect and defend The Constitution to the best of my ability” implying some ability exists and in this unique case none did or else they would have know Bush V gore for what it is:

WRONG, not in error, as it is bad math and no court on Earth can rewrite or amend the law of nature itself. Legally it constitutes a coup by the Supreme Court but actually it might be something else however SCOTUS refuses to fulfill that very same oath which every voter thus every office holder takes as well as the both specific to the office of Chief Justice.

Ultimately the sitting Chief Justice answers for the employees of this court.

On 11/20/08 documents that I filed were acted upon but never entered to the Court record. This denied every American their right of informed consent and harmed me grossly both emotionally and physically; it caused me to be denied all liberty and to feel liberty denied. It made me a desperate citizen with a just cause: My own life is at stake as is the lives of my children. The action on 11/20/08 which is this court addressing the actual and legal default of the US as no response from the US ever came in my case constitutes a Chief Justice standing aside; to then deny this action ever occurred on 11/09/09 is then the Chief justice denying he or his agent – this court – ever acted and that is repugnant. Further by acting but not filing the documents it is the sitting Chief Justice his agent answering for the US thus ANSWERING FOR ME, DECIDING TO FORCE A SETTLEMENT ON ME THAT I NEVER ASKED FOR NOR WANTED AS WELL AS ONE THAT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND WHICH VIOLATES MARBURY V MADISON AND ZINERMAN BUT WITHOUT ANY HEARING IN PERSON OCCURRING. The Supreme Court may not violate or overturn its own case law, rulings it itself made, w/o a hearing in person. It is treason to do so.

The Supreme Court crated a special, privileged class – its own self -thus all lawyers by granting itself blanket immunity form any and all consequences named in our law and by denying all citizens any and all dreamy and relief when it is readily and easily available – hearing in person – and when the Supreme court previously granted this to bush and Gore thus it is also the sitting Chief Justice violating the equal protection and due process clauses several times over as he is refusing to treat me, a woman and a genius, as his equal when I have already proven I am his equal and that I am more intelligent than he or any of his employees are. To avoid this case and avoid hearing me in person, to avoid The Constitution, this court then perpetrated what is a crime as it did so with full knowing and deliberation.

It also created an impossible standard as The Constitution is now not actual and real for me or any citizen who is not a lawyer or is not entrenched in an office thus holding a title or for nay person that is not wealthy as Bush and Gore as well as Roberts are all of those things as if they did not have a law degree they hired lawyers and in my unique case NY certified me “forever pro se” plus the Judiciary of NY recently defaulted as well by reporting me for my ability to argue US law within SCOTUS so that no defense is possible in any lower court.

I will never be a licensed lawyer nor will i ever be wealthy or titled as this is because the sitting Chief Justice and the employees of this court reasoned and decided they could harm me with impunity and no regard for the law or The People let alone my person or my biological children thus this court is then responsible and guilty of making it impossible for me to mount any defense in any other court but an international one thus embarrassing it into obeying the law and its own rulings as logic dictates that if NY State too seeks blanket immunity for its actions some of which are criminal and all of which hare unconstitutional then all it has to do is deny me as it has done in the past as SCOTUS has told NY “Susan will never be granted an actual or legal appeal”.

In short SCOTUS is excepting itself from the Constitution, The People, and from its own rulings by claiming via default but writing a lie - DENIAL - so that it is unchecking itself or reasoning it is no longer the court of constitutional authority.

The Chief Justice or his agents, this Court, is denying actual reality by exerting the power reserved to a God or a king, as if the Revolution never happened or as if the Creator did not endow man with will and liberty. This court is advocating more violent revolution, it is stating that no remedy and relief exists unless I and then we become violent or kill Obama and Roberts thus it is then signing its own death warrants. If forced to kill Obama or Roberts to secure liberty and justice I’m happy pt let this Court incriminate itself by refusing to hear me in person as it is insanity for this Court to take the position that it can and may revoke the Declaration or what God has joined to man – inalienable rights.

It is a violation of US law and actual reality to insist that I ask this court for a Writ as in this unique case, the rarest of all under US law, a pro se case of constitutional authority that pits the lone citizen who exhausted the process against both the sitting Chief Justice and sitting President, a citizen need not ask for a writ as that citizen then is the authority as that citizen has already entered the SCOTUS bar on paper via that past action on 11/20/08 as it then is direct entry and that action proves the citizens case against both persons as if the citizen did not fulfill Marbury and did not make her case then the sitting Chief Justice and this Court would take zero action as the petitioner, Susan, would not have an argument to make plus the writ needed does not exist yet!

Due to a never addressed “inconsistency” in US law and case law never addressed by any citizen until now as this situation never occurred until 2000 and then 2008 and 2009 there is a legal case in which asking for a writ is not only not necessary but it is impossible as no Writ exists to ask for military intervention aka martial law. The citizen who is the Petitioner issues the order; it is not a Writ of Prohibition or Mandamus as you are prohibiting the People or the military from doing anything nor are may you demand the military act to execute the officers of this court, as the guilty parties have a conflict they can never overcome thus the Justices cannot and may not issue such a writ; that is silliness at its height, exalting ORDER or RULE over LAW, asking a Justice to issue a writ that then orders the military to excite their own person only as the court rules demand you ask for a Writ of some type. I would if I could: if the Writ existed or if the logic was without fault.

This is a complex case that demands complex reasoning; from day one I argued that no clerk was to touch this case but deliver it directly to the justices as no clerk had the human ability to reason it thus summarize it correctly but the men who are clerks and who handled this case refused to acknowledge this fact and law as they are of the mistaken belief they are my bosses. I know this as fact as I was told this to my face by these clerks. The clerks insist court rule is inviolate law! They insist that they are the excption to US law while I am not the exception to court rule! And when I hold no law license thus NEVER agreed to play by court rule but only by US law.

Thus I now charge that the clerks are guilty of obstruction of justice. If the clerks did posses the human ability to reason thus summarize this case correctly they would then either be a sitting Justice or the petitioner but they are not thus they did and are obstructing justice each time they reject filing this case as I cannot ask for a nonexistent Writ and each time they attempt to summarize it for a Justice.

The clerks are in violation of Federalist 78 as well as they do not possess the necessary temperament or knowledge that is required; they are acting as if they are the Justices sand are the authority, as if they are better than me and have the exclusive right to usurp my legal power and moral authority when they do not. They have done nothing but exert over inflated ego, above reason and above law thus sentencing this nation and their own persons to death. They refuse to consider the truth, that their court rule is not US law and that the court rule covering this situation does not yet exist as the only way it can come to exist is via due process – hearing this case in person. Does not precedent set by this very court state that if no law covers this exact situation, if no legal President sits, that I may commit what is a crime but not be convicted as that law must exist or must be created if it does not? Does precedent set by this court not say that if my commission, The Constitution and the 19^th amendment, is a part of my defense then it must be adjudicated? Is this court then actively advocating and condoning, participating in or ordering the execution of Barack Obama and John Roberts? It deems as if it is as no other means exists at the point the latest denial was issued as there is o longer any such thing as due process as I myself finally exhausted the process.

As the Writ is nonexistent, there is no Writ to institute martial law to then enforce law, thus this court is now creating the impossible and what is a dictatorship and an oligarchy, all a clerk can and may do is hand this petition directly to the Justices informing them that they must read it their own selves as JUSTICES reasoned and decided Marbury V Madison and Bush V Gore.

Marbury, Madison, Bush and Gore were not treated as I, a woman, am nor were they made to do what is impossible as it does not exist. In the case of Bush and Gore?

This court rewrote US law for their benefit only and went so far as to attempt to rewrite the law of nature known as math and this court never bothered to write the rule covering this set of circumstances as they never transpired before and as Congress is beng allowed to adjucate the law via Resolution and its Judiciary Committee who then deems those unconstitutional and criminal resolutions ot be "law". See 511.

Proof no clerk can handle thus summarize this case correctly? All past action plus my person as I am the only person on Earth who knew why Bush V Gore is wrong. As it did lead to Obama? Only I can make this case, the case for women and for natural birth, and only SCOTUS can and may hear it in person and it must under law and case law or I will be forced to enact martial law and against this institution for if the employees of this institution are acting upon the belief they can and may violate US law any time they please and any way they please w/o any consequence? Then I have to teach them a lesson:

There is indeed a consequence and that consequence is death as The People despise you and the US military is chomping on the bit, anxiously awaiting the opening so that it may take action against the criminal officers including one who we all know is foreign so are now harming us lethally with their criminal activity. If this court wishes to join with the actual guilty parties and not the People led by me then be my guest.

I have already put the military on alert and informed them that due to the latest denial SCOTUS employees namely the Justices and clerks are now the most dangerous sitting officers and may have to be removed before Obama as they usurped and consolidated all power within SCOTUS via Bush V Gore, Rehnquist’s death, Roberts appointment and the actions in my case.

I will move the military exactly as I moved SCOTUS on 11/20/08 and so order the military to execute the Justices and clerks of this court FIRST as they had at least five opportunities to uphold the law and instead spit on it and so in our faces. SCOTUS was granted their right of due process and hearing in person as well as habeas corpus and SCOTUS passed thus pleading no contest or guilty. SCOTUS employees adjudicated their own case exactly as I said would and did then happen.

SCOTUS can write the word DENIED on a piece of paper; if it is then DENYING it ever heard Marbury, Bush V Gore or me on 11/20/08? Or DENYING the Revolution was fought? It is insane and so must be executed as you cannot argue deep seated prejudices nor may you reason with unreasonable people plus we cannot and may not accept any defense at the moment the Justices and clerks are being removed by force as we may not accept anything they say under duress as fact and truth. If they can’t or won’t tell the truth via no duress and due process then we can reasonably assume they will not tell the truth under duress as the one truth they aren’t willing to admit to is:

THE EMPLOYEES OF THIS COURT ARE SUBJECT TO THE CONSTITUTION BOTH PAPER AND PEOPLE; IT DOES HAVE TO ANSWER FOR ITS ACTIONS AND IT CAN BE MADE TO DO SO BY FORCE IF IT REFUSES ONCE THEY HAVE UNCONSTITUTIONALLY INSTALLED A PRESIDENT THUS MADE LAW.

So let’s try this again:

“The very essence of civil liberty certainly consists in the right of every individual to claim the protection of the laws, whenever he receives an injury. One of the first duties of government is to afford that protection. In Great Britain the king himself is sued in the respectful form of a petition, and he never fails to comply with the judgment of his court.” In the third volume of his Commentaries, page 23, Blackstone states two cases in which a remedy is afforded by mere operation of law. 'In all other cases,' he says, 'it is a general and indisputable rule, that where there is a legal right, there is also a legal remedy by suit or action at law whenever that right is invaded.' And afterwards, page 109 of the same volume, he says, 'I am next to consider such injuries as are cognizable by the courts of common law. And herein I shall for the present only remark, that all possible injuries whatsoever, that did not fall within the exclusive cognizance of either the ecclesiastical, military, or maritime tribunals, are, for that very reason, within the cognizance of the common law courts of justice; for it is a settled and invariable principle in the laws of England, that every right, when withheld, must have a remedy, and every injury its proper redress.'” Obviously; it’s self-evident as you would not have rights i.e. protection of the law if there were actually and legally no redress and no remedy and relief for injury. Also obvious is: “By the act concerning invalids, passed in June 1794, the secretary at war is ordered to place on the pension list all persons whose names are contained in a report previously made by him to congress. If he should refuse to do so, would the wounded veteran be without remedy? Is it to be contended that where the law in precise terms directs the performance of an act in which an individual is interested, the law is incapable of securing obedience to its mandate? Is it on account of the character of the person against whom the complaint is made? Is it to be contended that the heads of departments are not amenable to the laws of their country? Whatever the practice on particular occasions may be, the theory of this principle will certainly never be maintained. [5 U.S. 137, 165] . No act of the legislature confers so extraordinary a privilege, nor can it derive countenance from the doctrines of the common law. After stating that personal injury from the king to a subject is presumed to be impossible, Blackstone, Vol. III. p. 255, says, 'but injuries to the rights of property can scarcely be committed by the crown without the intervention of its officers: for whom, the law, in matters of right, entertains no respect or delicacy; but furnishes various methods of detecting the errors and misconduct of those agents by whom the king has been deceived and induced to do a temporary injustice.'” MY PROPERTY INTEREST IS THE PEOPLE, THE MILITARY AND MY TWO BIOLOGICAL CHILDREN AS WELL AS MY OWN PERSON. I SUFFERED PHYSICAL INJURY, RECALL? THIS ESCALATED UNTIL YOU ASSAULTED AND BATTERED THE WRITTEN DOCUMENTS. THE PROPERTY INTEREST IS THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS AMENDED W/O DUE PROCESS AT LEAST THREE TIMES. SO FORGET THE PEOPLE; ARE YOU ABOUT TO TELL US THAT THE PHYSICAL PAPER DOCUMENTS THE TAXPAYERS OWN ARE NOT PROPERTY??? I’d think land, vegetation, minerals, water, air and animals is a given. [An side: The dependence of American lawyers and judges most especially Justices to rely upon Blackstone’s, or, to ignore every petitioner who does not rely on this work and its form, is also unconstitutional. I was exactly told by a lawyer that the reason I was getting nowhere with SCOTUS is that I did not use Blackstone’s as my crutch. I objected; I said, “No, the reason SCOTUS, both the clerks and the Justices, is hell bent upon facing a firing squad is: This case is a logic problem that then is a pattern of complex concepts. As I use much more than 10% of my brain the logic and the patterns are very easy for me to process and discern; I can extrapolate smaller and smaller ideas...but I understand it wholly, or, as time is not in a linear fashion. I do not need any of these patterns or concepts to appear in linear order to understand them and recognize them; I can handle much more information than any Justice can thus as I must dumb this down in what seems to be an ad infinitum manner too much information is then lost. Then the Justices are not even making those tiniest of all connections, as I had to remove them so they could process one minuscule idea after another instead of the larger single concept let alone a pattern of concepts. I will quote: “Concepts fit together in patterns in order for there to be communication between us. I must disentangle a concept from its pattern, which is somewhat difficult. It is somewhat like having to disentangle a particular word from a strong emotional association. I experience patterns made up of concepts, and you use words in associations. When I speak to you I must disentangle the concept from the patterns, which sometimes leaves me with short ends because it is natural for me to experience the concepts in their entirety; and yet I must drop very important data by the wayside because you are not capable of handling it, except in consecutive form.” “

I’m experiencing patterns made up of concepts, some of them complex, while SCOTUS is experiencing absolute ideas such as: “she can’t tell us what to do”. That’s an idea; the concept would be the discrimination of women realized as overthrow of The Constitution and skewing power in favor of a title when our law reads one person, one vote and equal protection; the pattern is acting as if the law does not apply to you, the titled person, when clearly I’m your boss under US law as you’re the one who takes pay for what he does while I do not thus all moral authority belongs to me, obliterating your one vote as my vote negates it. Think of this demand as me, the authority, voting against you, not the authority. To win against me you would then have to possess at least some moral authority and this latest denial is proof – you do not.

And the final nail in your coffin: “The question whether a right has vested or not, is, in its nature, judicial, and must be tried by the judicial authority, If, for example, Mr. Marbury had taken the oaths of a magistrate, and proceeded to act as one; in consequence of which a suit had been instituted against him, in which his defence had depended on his being a magistrate; the validity of his appointment must have been determined by judicial authority. So, if he conceives that by virtue of his appointment he has a legal right either to the commission which has been made out for him or to a copy of that commission, it is equally a question examinable in a court, and the decision of the court upon it must depend on the opinion entertained of his appointment. That question has been discussed, and the opinion is, that the latest point of time which can be taken as that at which the appointment was complete, and evidenced, was when, after the signature of the president, the seal of the United States was affixed to the commission.” I have claimed from day one my commission is a part of my defense. No matter what commission you examine, are you about to tell us that the President did not sign the Declaration, Constitution and 19^th amendment? That by voting The People did not sign these same documents? Or by appearing before SCOTUS, or rather by hiring legal representatives to appear IN PERSON, that they did not sign Marbury? Once you violate this sentence by not allowing for that in person appearance:

SCOTUS AS AN INSTITUTION IS REPUGNANT THUS AUTOMATICALLY VOID AS THE CONSTITUTIONALLY SET GOVERNMENT ISN’T THE PAPER BUT THE PEOPLE, LIVE ONES NOT DEAD BODIES AND NOT NAMES UPON DEAD PAPER.

“The question whether a right has vested or not, is, in its nature, judicial, and must be tried by the judicial authority. If, for example, Mr. Marbury had taken the oaths of a magistrate, and proceeded to act as one; in consequence of which a suit had been instituted against him, in which his defence had depended on his being a magistrate; the validity of his appointment must have been determined by judicial authority. [I took the oath and proceeded to act. My defense and so defense of the nation depends upon being the President and Commander. I exactly named this as my defense in NY, a court action undertaken while I was still within SCOTUS but after I had already won the first time. Judicial authority must review it. SCOTUS had the proof: My petition, brief and motions and the NY court order denying the SCOTUS docket and denying The Constitution thus violating it. I appeared pro se in SCOTUS and in NY thus proving I did fulfill the oath of office. I informed the judge of my authority – to her face - and so it is on the court record. In NY, in October of 2008, before the election and before giving this testimony, I swore an oath, an actual oath thus I took and fulfilled the oath of office as it reads I WILL not MY LAWYER WILL. And all courts are courts of constitutional authority as The Constitution is the standard and as you can and may enter with a federal case concerning the violation of a fully vested fundamental right and/or a constitutional authority case. It’s entirely possible and it happened to me as I exhausted the Judiciary. Upon leaving NY and re-entering SCOTUS as the Commander as well as the President this time around I then hired people who found me upon reading my case and citizens acknowledge me as the President and Commander. Thus the SCOTUS denial issued on 11/09/09 and it itself as it now exists is repugnant and so void and the power of judicial review is automatically granted to the military via my standing as Commander].” – John Marshall, Susan Herbert

In this type of case? ALL defendants must enter an actual, written response or else neither the US nor my one person can defend ourselves. And now we aren’t being allowed to face our accusers: The clerks and Justices that tried and found us in abstentia. This happens to be US law and US case as Marbury received a response and a hearing in person; the Court named an actual reason they were denying him his paper commission- it’s the wrong court - but it’s the correct court this time as SCOTUS did this via Bush V Gore thus is accountable and responsible and if no hearing in person is granted then guilty too due all of the action that took place in my case within SCOTUS. If SCOTUS wants to play that game - we can’t win against her or The People so let’s keep her out - be my guest as we can always let the citizens and the military do what SCOTUS will not.

SCOTUS has only two choices: Hear this case in person or cease to exist as a court of law as the proper authority will be called upon to use force to remove you, try you and hang you as at least one mother and one enlisted service member died as a direct result of your refusal to hear this case when your own original charter, your own original intent, says you must. I myself prefer the firing squad. Treason and death is exactly named within the Constitution thus there is no other recourse; it’s your death. You’ll die one way or the other. I am not going to violate the Constitution for you, as this is the problem: You invoking Art. III to deny people justice by avoiding duty such as reporting the exact details of criminal acts that you have, that you know.

THIS COURT KNOWS AND ALWAYS HAS KNOWN BUSH AND OBAMA ARE NOT LEGAL AND THAT CRIMES WERE COMMITTED AGAINST ME, MOTHERS AND ENLISTED SERVICE MEMBERS BUT REFUSED TO DO ITS MOST BASIS DUTY. IT ATTEMPTED TO CITE ART. III TO EXCUSE THIS CRIMINAL, TRAITOROUS ACTIVITY AND ATTEMPTED TO DO SO ONCE MORE AFTER IT DENIED THOSE SAME PEOPLE ANY AND ALL PROTECTION OF THE LAW THUS AS THE PLAYING FIELD IS NOW LEVELED BY ME SCOTUS CANNOT AND MAY NOT CITE ART. III, AS THAT IS YOU FINDING US IN ABSTENTIA WHEN YOU DO NOT ACCORD US THE SAME PROTECTION YOU NOW EXPLOIT AND WHEN YOU REFUSE TO ALLOW US ENTRY IN FAVOR OF LAWYERS, PEOPLE FORMALLY TRAINED IN THE LAW, WHO ARE GUILTY, IN FAVOR OF THE WEALTHY, IN FAVOR OF ACTUAL TERRORISTS AND IN FAVOR OF PAPER AND TITLES OR DEAD INSTITUTIONS. [An aside: You do realize that the actual 9/11 bombers were allowed entry to the very same NY courts that denied me an appearance in person? And then threw out my petitions naming me as the plaintiff thus refusing to allow me to file as the plaintiff but only the defendant as if I am guilty, to make it seem as if, and later ignored and denied my paper appearance to get around all fact and law? NY made me the defendant; NY gave me this defense. NY made my commission a part of my defense.

This is treason; it has now risen to treason and subversion and the clerks and Justices are responsible in varying degrees as only three possibilities exist at this point and the only common denominators are: The clerks, the unconstitutional and criminal denial to be heard in person and me and it is not me as it can’t be me. It can’t be the Justices as I never once spoke to one of them nor heard a word come from their mouths. For me or the military to believe all nine Justices did this? A clerk would push his luck until the US military shows up to remove him but would a Justice? It’s doubtful. Going back to Marbury, now completely violated:

So, if he conceives that, by virtue of his appointment, he has a legal right, either to the commission which has been made out for him, or to a copy of that commission, it is equally a question examinable in a court, and the decision of the court upon it must depend on the opinion entertained of his appointment.

That question has been discussed, and the opinion is, that the latest point of time which can be taken as that at which the appointment was complete, and evidenced, was when, after the signature of the president, the seal of the United States was affixed to the commission. [The Declaration, Constitution and 19^th Amendments were signed and a seal affixed. I also affixed a seal to my documents.]

It is then the opinion of the court: 1st. That by signing the commission of Mr. Marbury, the president of the United States appointed him a justice of peace, for the county of Washington in the district of Columbia; and that the seal of the United States, affixed thereto by the secretary of state, is conclusive testimony of the verity of the signature, and of the completion of the appointment; and that the appointment conferred on him a legal right to the office for the space of five years. 2dly. That, having this legal title to the office, he has a consequent right to the commission; a refusal to deliver which, is a plain violation of that right, for which the laws of his country afford him a remedy.” – John Marshall, Marbury.

If SCOTUS seeks a stand off? As what is has now demanded by its latest denial is a violent not orderly restoration? You have it and I have the means and the 10^th district was even kind enough to establish our Constitutional basis as well as my own. We may now use force – lethal force –against all charged. As there are two courts I can and may enter this default judgment to so I then may collect my award or my asked for remedy and relief?

You and I will be meeting IN PERSON in a court of law only you will not have the home field advantage.

If SCOTUS does not surrender to me, The People and the military then We will use lethal force to remove you and SCOTUS will cease to exist thus I secure exactly what I set out to secure: The end of SCOTUS as we know it and, without SCOTUS, constitutional authority falls to the lone citizen via the common law and/or military courts. Constitutional authority and so judicial review as the right of the citizen vests as does natural birth and I would know as I acted to fully vest it and as justice is not possible any other way if SCOTUS is not willing to obey the law. If SCOTUS will not do the least of its duties, hear living people who are not lawyers or name an actual reason other that the no longer good Art. III, then SCOTUS is no longer organic to The People thus is repugnant and so void. We can and will wipe it off the face of this Earth for if we can’t appear in person within it and if the Justices and/or clerks are bragging they do not have to obey The Constitution they now exploit than why let it exist at all?

John Marshall said, “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases must, of necessity, expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each. So if a law be in opposition to the Constitution; if both the law and the constitution apply to a particular case, so that the court must either decide that case conformably to the law, disregarding the Constitution; or conformably to the Constitution, disregarding the law; the court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case. This is of the very essence of judicial duty.”

Marshall did not say “except for natural birth” or “except for when the citizens make law via a direct vote by installing a person who is not qualified to hold the Office of the Executive”. SCOTUS can’t have it two ways – denying The People authority one minute but then forcing it upon them then next via unconstitutional and criminal denials and other unjust rulings that we are not ‘allowed’ to fight which leave us no recourse but violence and by refusing to create the venue as SCOTUS seems to believe it is above the law. If SCOTUS refuses to create the venue then we inform SCOTUS: The real, actual reason Marshall and no other person or court ever ruled the only clause that can’t be adjudicated is “natural birth” is because we were born in a war and so we can and may be born again in a war especially if SCOTUS is ‘ordering’ the only redress possible is violent redress. We can and may create the venue via another war as we did that first time, in 1776.

The Constitution conflicts with the law some of not all of the citizens made via a direct vote that violates every one of my fundamental rights such as due process, liberty, equal protection, freedom of speech, religion and press, natural birth and custody of my children. It made me the defendant in NY and I have already exhausted the NY Appellate twice over thus I remain the defendant and the commission is apart of my defense plus the law the citizens made is now on the table as SCOTUS must adjudicate the issue or cease to exist as an institution. The Constitution provides no means to make law via the direct vote of The People be they innocent or guilty. SCOTUS may not personally like it but it is on me to bring the case into SCOTUS not on NY thus although SCOTUS unconstitutionally invokes its rule as law the word “plaintiff” is merely a word; in this case I am the plaintiff/defendant mounting my defense inside SCOTUS as that is the nature of an authority suit of this type, different from Marbury as I did what Marshall instructed while William Marbury did not thus my defense will always be mounted in SCOTUS or in front of The People, either a common law court or via military action and any common law action must then be enforced by the military thus I, Susan, go straight to the military as I re-entered this court as the Commander. I am in no way the plaintiff as now even SCOTUS is acting criminally and so injuring me with full knowing thus like NY I am being found. I’m DEFENDING myself against every unjust institution and person including the clerks and Justices of this court and now I have been told you must use violence or you will never, ever secure the protection of the Declaration and Constitution – liberty and justice - as we, SCOTUS, will not accord it to you any other way except for violence aka a military action.

NY defaulted when it called the US Marshals reported me for doing nothign more than filing within SCOTUS and then servign them legal notice AS THE LAW AND COURT RULES INSTRUCTS ME TO DO. As judge did it then it constitutes default thus my defense left NY and landed here. AGAIN.

You may not fault me for being smarter than all of you; you may not fault me as you ignored my warnings as I made several attempts to appear as the plaintiff in NY but Linda Griffin refused to believe The Constitution, my fact and Marbury V Madison when I told her she was bringing the wrath of the US military down upon her head by throwing out the petitions I filed as the plaintiff and then entering the petition the Austin’s filed as the plaintiff; go look – did I not name “first one to the bar” for SCOTUS? As in NY and other state courts award children based upon first one to the bar when this is unconstitutional? That’s within 07-9804. I warned FL too when the FL judges all took the day off to avoid hearing me as the plaintiff and then let the case, an emergency case that is to be heard within 24 hours, sit. It has been almost two years not 24 hours. Like NY the FL judiciary reasoned and decided it was smarter than me and more powerful than me; it denied the law of the US and the law of nature. FL too the made me the DEFENDANT within SCOTUS as this is the only possible way to defend myself from FL because of Bush V gore and all of its effects one of which is all offices have now fallen, even SCOTUS. Consequently every time I was injured the guilty parties buried themselves deeper. NY & FL MADE ME THE PETITIONER/APPLICANT/ DEFENDANT WITHIN SCOTUS.

If the judiciary falls in any nation but most especially in a Constitutional Republic? The citizens have earned the right to shoot and it is in their best interests to do so. Shooting has vested. They should aim for those in the Whitehouse, SCOTUS and Congress with SCOTUS Justices and clerks being the most dangerous sitting officers of all as Barack Obama could not reason his way out of a paper bag, not even with a teleprompter to tell him how, and nobody truly believes him or even so much as likes him these days – his approval rating fell through the floor – it’s a US record – thus SCOTUS became enemy #1 as it is yet lying to the masses. Then you take out the rest. I advocate aiming for SCOTUS first then at Obama as it is not a violation of chain of command theory as Marshall said the President and Chief Justice are equal and as somebody in this court believes they are unequal or above the law thus above us so I say it’s constitutional to take out SCOTUS first and then go after Obama. Don’t worry: The People and I will reason and act upon the most effective, Constitutional plan as the Founders wrote it down for us.

JOHN MARSHALL TOLD ME WHAT TO DO AS HE ANSWERED SEVERAL QUESTIONS NEVER EXACTLY ASKED AS HE HAD TO JUSTIFY HIS ANSWER, HIS POSITION, THUS I KNEW WHAT THOSE QUESTIONS ARE AS FIRST HE HAD TO ASK HIMSELF THOSE SAME QUESTIONS AND THEN HE PUT HIS ANSWERS WITHIN HIS RESPONSE, HIS RULING. ALL HE DID WAS REASON HOW AND WHY THE LONE VOTER IS EQUAL TO THE PRESIDENT AND THE CHIEF JUSTICE BY EXACTLY STATING WE ARE TO ACT UPON OUR CONSCIENCE, OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAW OR MORAL AUTHORITY.

MY POINT OF LAW HAS ALWAYS BEEN: THERE IS NO WRIT TO ASK FOR; THE WRIT COVERING THIS UNIQUE LEGAL SITUATION AND THIS INJURY DOES NOT EXIST AS YOU CAN’T DO THIS IN ANY NATION EXCEPT FOR THE US AS ONLY WE ARE AN ACTUAL CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC; YOU CAN’T DECLARE MARTIAL LAW UNDER A KING AND IF THE PEOPLE REVOLT? THE KING CAN AND WILL OPEN FIRE ON HIS OWN SUBJECTS AS THEY AREN’T LIBERATED BY THEIR VERY NATURE AS THEY CAN LABEL IT A CONSTITUTION BUT IF IT IS NOT OURS THEN IT IS NOT AN ACTUAL CONSTITUTION AS ONLY OURS IS ELEGANT. YOU’RE TRYING TO APPLY BRITISH LAW AND BRITISH FORM TO THE CONSTITUTION THUS YOU, THIS COURT, ARE OVERTHROWING IT. WE WOULDN’T HAVE A WRIT TO COVER THIS SITUATION AS WRITS ARE BRITISH THUS WE HAD TO EXIST FIRST AND WE HAD TO VIOLATE THE LAW AND WE HAD TO DESTROY THE REPUBLIC AND THEN I HAD TO SUE TO PROVE TO YOU THE WRIT DOES NOT EXIST AS IT CAN ONLY EXIST IF WE CREATE IT BY CREATING THE VENUE THUS THE VENUE BECOMES THE PEOPLE WITH MILITARY AND WE ACT AGAINST THIS COURT UNLESS THIS COURT HEARS THIS CASE IN PERSON.

This Court is making the claim it is the authority OVER The Constitution! Not equal to but over as in the authority in place of the constitution, exactly what some of the voters claimed and all currently sitting officers claimed. This constitutes TREASON.

The rough draft of the petition to be reheard:

No. ___________________

In The

Supreme Court Of The United States

Susan Herbert

A Natural Born Citizen Who Is A Mother And So Shed Her Blood And Risked Her Life

In Defense Of The Constitution Or We, The People

Thus The Protected Right Is Hers

Petitioner/Applicant/Defendant

as I'm defending myself against the actions

of SCOTUS itself and some of the voters

BARACK OBAMA

JOHN ROBERTS

FRANK HULL

And

The United States Of America,

Respondents.

______________________

PETITION TO BE REHEARD

FINAL DEMAND TO BE HEARD IN PERSON

AS THE AUTHORITY ISN’T ASKING YOU FOR ANYTHING

_______________________

Susan Herbert, pro se

1100 Seagate Avenue 101

Neptune Beach, FL 32266

904-705-6171

This is going to be short and sweet: The time to trade paper back and forth has come and gone. SCOTUS has finally become repugnant thus all of its actions are automatically void as it has violated the last line in Marbury that I needed it to violate to then submit what constitutes a judgment of default to the proper ‘court’.

The latest decision out of SCOTUS reads “DENIAL” but that is not possible in this type of case based upon all fact such as previous court action and US history. It must then be a judgment of default, that is, SCOTUS has now defaulted thus tried and found the People and the military in abstentia when we could appear and wanted to appear in person. We all know SCOTUS has no rule covering this situation and we all know SCOTUS wildly and recklessly invokes its own rule as law as if it can and may supercede the authority of the written Constitution and The People. Thus it has no provision for DEFAULTING as by its very nature to default is to perpetrate a coup or to actively overthrow the Constitution both written and living. It’s to do it or to participate with full knowing, willingness and deliberation. It is to target mothers and enlisted service members directly and unjustly as that’s all it can be in a case revolving around natural birth in both letter and spirit. And we all know SCOTUS has no office to then submit a judgment of default thus we can reasonably assume SCOTUS meant to injure mothers and enlisted service members in a permanent, impossible manner – death, without any reason or cause other than the Justices and clerks own selfish interests like their titles and paychecks.

US law and code is if you act in such a manner and cause the death of a citizen you then may be subject to a charge of treason and the death penalty in return.

SCOTUS may still be acting under the delusion that it is smarter than I am or more able than I am but think again as exactly as I have defeated you each time we engaged previously I have defeated you this time: I knew this might happen and planned for it. I know exactly what ‘court’ to enter this judgment to and last year I set up the exact situation whereby SCOTUS must hear this case or die as an institution: you will be rounded up, charged and placed in jail until the common law courts try you as your guilt is proven by your final or absolute EXACT violation of Marbury thus you are no longer acting under original intent. So here we go, keeping in mind no sane, rational person can read my brief or petition 09-6777 and claim you are in the right as I was ‘nice’ to you and even accorded you every opportunity I could going so far as to claim you are geniuses. YES, as either you’re legal geniuses or criminal masterminds and so I guess we will once and for all find out which one it is:

"The Government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men. It will certainly cease to deserve this high appellation if the laws furnish no remedy for the violation of a vested legal right." I have exhuasted the process thus a denial is SCOTUS claiming zero remedy or relief exists which is a lie, an exact lie, as hearing in person exists and is entirely awardable and in this case is what Marshal instructed you to do. Thus SCOTUS is deciding we are not a nation of law and are animals not men plus we can’t govern our own selves. Lies, lies, lies. This denial then is repugnant thus void, the Justices who wrote it are repugnant and SCOTUS itslef is repugnant thus void. You wil be removed and the doors of this courthouse will be closed.

“If courts are to regard the Constitution, and the Constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature, the Constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply.” SCOTUS may not invoke ANY court rule as law; its rules concerning ‘you must ask for a writ’ are void exactly as USC 1331 is void as they are repugnant in my case as they then make it impossible to secure justice due to chain of command theory and the Office of the Executive also being the Office of Commander. SCOTUS must invoke The Constitution and in this case may not cite Art. III to avoid doing its duty as that then is a crime. SCOTUS may not deny The People, the military or myself any and all protection of the law but then find us under the law. Citing Art. III grants SCOTUS a right not named anywhere in our law, makes the Justices and other SCOTUS employees a privileged class and is an act in this unique case which Marshall said you may not do: Violate moral authority or violate the spirit of our law. All SCOTUS has is moral authority as we all have the same legal power, one vote, thus violating moral authority makes ME, The People and the military the authority not SCOTUS. This denial then is an act that is repugnant that then voids the institution itself as being unconstitutional as SCOTUS can no longer be organic to the People if it denies those people an appearance in person to address the violation of a fully vested fundamental right. Therefore upon the fall of SCOTUS two exact ‘courts’ then become the authority. Do not be surprised if there is a knock on your chamber door and it is not the mailman but the authority, handing you your walking papers while placing handcuffs on your wrists.

SCOTUS AS AN INSTITUTION IS REPUGNANT THUS AUTOMATICALLY VOID AS THE CONSTITUTIONALLY SET GOVERNMENT ISN’T THE PAPER BUT THE PEOPLE, LIVE ONES NOT DEAD BODIES AND NOT NAMES UPON DEAD PAPER.

I am in the NY courts DIRECTLY due to an illegal action of SCOTUS that violated Marbury. I was dragged before the NY courts illegally on the very day SCOTUS first violated Marbury, after I already entered the FL courts. In both states my defense is: the US defaulted and that with past unconstitutional rulings of SCOTUS namely Bush V Gore, made me the authority, the acting, legal, constitutionally set President and Commander as I successfully pressed a pro se case of constitutional authority and original jurisdiction and not only secured placement upon the conference list but also forced direct action upon direct entry of an emergency appeal. The math of BVG? You may not argue math and as you can’t. We do not argue good math, as it’s impossible but arguing bad math? That’s known as arguing contract law. My defense is my commission was not only delivered but a seal affixed. Am I to believe the 19^th amendment is not signed, sealed and entered thus delivered? Or that the two governing original contracts aren’t? Forget the originals: The 1871 Constitution is signed, sealed, entered and delivered and you defaulted upon that too AFTER overthrowing it (BVG) and the original. And you know, SCOTUS singed, sealed entered and delivered its ruling as well that then constitutes another commission. SCOTUS forgot one thing:

I took an oath in person and then exactly and specifically entered my commission to act as President and Commander having been signed, sealed, entered and delivered as my defense. I appeared in person in NY after SCOTUS once again had this case; knowing overthrow is I then took the oath of office in open court and proceeded to enter as my defense the fact that my SCOTUS case, establishing that I was the authority and my commission had been delivered and so I was now acting upon my knowledge of it. The judge asked me to my face EXACTLY to state whether my commission was state or federal, as in the NY State Supreme Court or THE Supreme Court of the US? I answered, “The Supreme Court of the US.” I entered this defense in both writing and orally. After the hearing I then contacted the judge: “If you believe that you can weasel out of this think again: NOBODY is going to believe you when you cry you did not know it was a federal case and that you did not know you were obstructing justice by filing and docketing a case over which you never had legal jurisdiction and still do not. You asked me the question as to what Supreme Court as your planned defense is ignorance, as in you did not know it was SCOTUS. You can’t read the docket or what I entered? The court record will fall apart under examination; the transcript of the proceeding will prove you are a criminal instead of making it seem as if what you did is legal. Thanks for asking me that question! Now: Try again as you are caught.” I then went on to inform this judge that the exactly named Creator delivered the only commission that counts as he endowed us with will and liberty and what god has joined no man can disjoin. See A Summary View Of The Rights Of British America, Jefferson. I stated that I entered my case having won so all I had to do is wear SCOTUS out as eventually they would back themselves into a corner as this is a logic problem the greatest minds on the planet grappled with through human history and I resolved it. I stated all of SCOTUS put together, every employee and indeed ever crook in this nation combined, did not have the intellectual prowess to defeat me and certainly no other person possessed my will. It is logic problem you CAN’T wrap your minds around as you do not have the hum ability to access that region of your brain while I do; call me a freak of nature thus this nation needs me. I then said, ‘Your actions against me caused me to die and caused my children to be injured beyond repair thus you gave me nothing to lose. You took it all, even my life, thus I have no reason to NOT attack as I know as fact how this ending will play itself out.’ I then added: You do not have the power to stop me from claiming my destiny and fate as that is an act of God.

Proof my commission is good? The judge then retired after I ordered her to do so as I ordered her to leave the bench. I also managed to divest myself of Mel Martinez, “judge” Henry Adams and at least three others. Why did any of these people, including SCOTUS itself act if my orders are not good and if I had no moral authority?

I exactly named every element of the commission and Linda Griffin in an attempt to be her same old nasty self then WROTE THIS DOWN EXACTLY EVEN REFERRING TO IT AS BOTH A LETTER AND A COURT DOCUMENT, PART OF THE RECORD. She denied and ignored my entire written answer, every fact and law save a single scientific law, but still entered my defense, the commission is good and is mine; it is binding, valid and legal. She too named every element such as SCOTUS and “God”. EXACTLY. I planned this. I made it happen.

I told SCOTUS time and time again: NONE of this is random; people too are not random. You’re a science so I can and do know exactly how you will respond. I can plan for it. I can design a plan and execute it accounting for you. I can and do make the impossible then possible. If SCOTUS sets up what is impossible? There’s always a way around it as Blackstone’s tells you if you pay attention to what you, your own self, cite and invoke as law when it is not and it’s British not American to boot: If it is a right, an actual right, then it is inalienable so that SCOTUS may not deny it or take it from you thus if they try just find the thing in this universe that you can use as a force against the now criminal SCOTUS action; you’ll win as you’re using what is actual reality while they are using what they personally like – what is fantasy - so they have no law and no natural force on their side but you do. From BLACKSTONES.

I reduced the entire work into a single concept, JUSTICES UNLIKE KINGS NOT ONLY ARE DUPED INTO DOING INJUSTICE BUT ISSUE CRIMINAL ORDERS THEIR AGENTS THEN ACT UPON MAKING THEM ALL CRIMINALS aka after stating that personal injury from the king to a subject is presumed to be impossible the law, in matters of right...furnishes various methods of the errors and misconduct of those agents by whom the king has been deceived and induced to do a temporary injustice, the ideas or parts of which appear in a linear, consecutive sequence in this new petition and in all of my documents so that you might understand. This court itself unjustly and insanely added "not possible if you sport the label Supreme Court" as if a king and all other people could do it but SCOTUS could not, as if only SCOTUS could not cause injury, which you will find no where in Blackstone's or US - not the exact words, the idea or the concept. It does not exist in this universe as NOTHING makes only SCOTUS, the clerks and Justices, ABSOLUTELY PERFECT and so beyond any and all human error.

I will word it for SCOTUS once more as I worded it for another:

You and I will be meeting IN PERSON in a court of law only you will not have the home field advantage.

How dare you question my authority? How dare you question the authority of The People or the military? How dare you violate the very principles The Founders gave up their lives to accord us? How dare you sink to become every single rotten thing you have ever been accused of being? How dare you sit under a portrait of Marshall and shake hands, entering an honor bound agreement to defame him and our Constitution? How dare you make an attempt to revoke the Declaration as if you are a god? How dare you sell us, literally sell us, back to the Crown when you know Obama openly advertised on his own website that he was subject to that Crown upon birth? How dare you condone premeditation as the Secret Service began protecting him 18 months BEFORE the election and as his associates began arguing for the repeal of the natural birth clause and so our sovereignty as far back as 2006? You know as I informed you.

How dare you surrender to Britain and colonial rule, SOCIALISM and DESPOTISM, without a fight? You are nothing more than cowards as genius does a coward no good and at this point your genius is now in question isn’t it? as is your sanity. There’s something else The Founders including your personal patron saint John Marshall said you may not do: Fail to put up a fight.

I fought: I changed it all up by suing the Justices and the clerks themselves for what is an original case decided WRONGLY not in error as we do not give our opinion where math is concerned as it is inviolate; it is exactly worded law Math will never, ever change in this universe. Thus as all men have unclean hands, no male clerk could legally touch my petition and as the clerks did not know the real, actual reasons BVG is wrong and became a coup, no clerk then could reason the massive point of law and so correctly summarize my case for a Justice; the clerks could never, ever overcome the conflict – IQ - and so all of them together are not my equals when it comes to law or logic as they violated it over and over while I did not thus they have zero moral authority but clerks insisted upon interfering aka obstructing justice in manner that meets the legal definition of treason. If a clerk did actually have the brainpower to correctly summarize this case of a Justice? 1. I never would have gotten this far and 2. That clerk would be the petitioner.

In this unique instance, a first in all of world history, the clerks were to take my petitions and deliver them directly to the Justices as the only able and capable persons, the only possible equals I have when it concerns reasoning US law, are the Justices. Unless a clerk sat as one they then are in violation of the equal protection and due process clauses as they are denying me that right as they CAN’T accord it w/o that same IQ and are in violation of US case law –Zinerman. A clerk was to state simply to a Justice: I CAN’T and MAY NOT make an attempt to summarize this case as both John Roberts and Obama as well as the clerks are named, thus all sitting officers are named as are some voters, and it involves a ruling of this court that was decided WRONGLY thus violated the fundamental fully vested rights of The People, namely women who are mothers and their children some of who are enlisted service members. The unique legal standing and the unique fact make it a crime for me to attempt to summarize this case thus you, the Justice must read it yourself or else no due process and indeed, no process at all exists. Did the clerks do this? I guess we will find out, won’t we?

The only action any clerk could take and it not be a crime? Check the petition for technical errors and even then the clerk may not cite rule as The Constitution is already overthrown or Obama would not be sitting and BVG never would have been heard. Hmm, the clerks acted AFTER the vote, after the overthrow, on 11/20/08. Thus they knew but did it regardless. I warned this court that you would be signing your own death warrants and I meant it as all I ever needed to call out the US military and The People against SCOTUS was this very ruling, a DENIAL of our right to redress of the violation of a fully vested interest and right as that then is SCOTUS committing what is treason and so constitutional authority belongs to The People via common law courts and the military; this DENIAL w/o any named reasoning and with out any respondent answering? It is the US military’s marching orders; it allows them to act against the sitting officers thus put bullets in all of your heads or better yet blow up the damn building with all of you inside: IF SCOTUS IS THE INSTITUTION THAT HEARD AN ORIGINAL CASE AND DECIDED IT WRONGLY THUS INSTALLED A PRESIDENT IN WHAT NOW IS A CRIMINAL MANNER AS IT REFUSED TO ADDRESS THAT VIOLATION OF OUR RIGHTS THEN SCOTUS IS INVOKING MARTIAL LAW AGAINST ITS OWN SELF. Fully expecting this as the clerks would not keep their paws off of my case and they are the only common denominator I have been in contact with the military.

SCOTUS will now hear this case in person as that is the one and only action that is constitutional as I not once shut out any and all comers IF they could mount an argument against me and as I ascended to the Office via due process and without a lawyer thus I am in accordance with all law and case law or SCOTUS will go the way of the dinosaur as we will tear it down brick by brick. An all volunteer citizen army of at least 3 million with as many as 5 million has pledged to march upon DC and specifically the Whitehouse, Congress and SCOTUS if Congress does not hear this case in person. As SCOTUS had not only due process but all the unjust advantage in the world? And as the 5^th Amendment states we do not need a grand jury indictment, as this is a crime related to the Commander, me, as the execution of my duties as SCOTUS prevented this thus obstructed justice for all? I will be ordering the citizens and the military to shoot to kill as treason is named in the Constitution and case law is if even one person died as a direct result of SCOTUS’ repeated failure to accord me redress thus accord the People redress then death and so the death penalty must be the verdict. .NOTHING else is legal.

SCOTUS can make an attempt to decide that Susan alone of all people ever and now the citizens have zero interest and zero right but if they do and if they then insist upon committing what now constitutes treason? Susan Herbert will order the citizens to rip the employees of SCOTUS from limb to limb and she will personally fed the pieces to the animals in the Washington Zoo.

We have just cause and constitutional reason: If not for SCOTUS and Bush V Gore? No Bush, no Cheney, no Iraq, no Roberts, no Schiavo, no Wallstreet bailout 2 x over, no Obama and so no overthrow. SCOTUS IS THE INSTITUTION AT FAULT, IT IS GUILTY OF IT ALL, AND SCOTUS WILL BE MADE TO PAY THE CONSTITUTIONALLY SET PRICE.

In case you still don’t get it: JOHN MARSHALL RESPONDED. His written ruling is the response; no law and no case law says JOHN ROBERTS MAY FAIL TO RESPOND THUS FAIL TO ACT AND IN THE US? IF YOU AS THE CHIEF JUSTICE FAIL TO RESPOND THUS FAIL TO ACT IN DEFENSE OF THE CONSTITUTION BOTH PEOPLE AND PAPER? The People and the military can and may then beat you to death – LEGALLY.

Thus SCOTUS employees might want to change tier minds on this one and in a hurry as the Department of Justice now has the goods on you as it could not act until I proved beyond any doubt that the employees of SCOTUS be they clerks or Justices were and are actively committing what is treason and now they have that proof as this court gave it to them in the form of a denial which is actually a default. If SCOTUS defaults upon the constitution and Marbury? Nothing is now out of bounds and there is zero doubt: SCOTUS is guilty.

I know SCOTUS is now installing atheism as the state religion while it installs its own persons as gods and kings with power that does not even exist in this universe let alone this nation so also making the attempt to overthrow our Declaration that names The Creator exactly as atheists have zero proof supporting their argument and all proof is against them but SCOTUS keeps allowing them entry in person and keeps ruling for them, thus if you believe in no beliefs, not even true beliefs thus have no faith, then what you believe or have faith in is none of this is reality, or, we did not win the Revolution but here is what THE highest exactly named authority has to say about In Re Susan Herbert, aka The People and the military:

“For thus says the LORD, "You were sold for nothing and you will be redeemed without money. For thus says the Lord GOD, "My peoplewent down at the first into Egypt to reside there; then the Assyrian oppressed them without cause. Now therefore, what do I have here," declares the LORD, "seeing that My people have been taken away without cause?" Again the LORD declares, "Those who rule over them howl, and My name is continually blasphemed all day long. "Therefore My people shall know My name; therefore in that day I am the one who is speaking, 'Here I am'...His [her] grave was assigned with wicked, Yet He [she] was with a rich man in His [her] death Because He [she] had done no violence, Nor was there any deceit in His [her] mouth. But the LORD was pleased To crush Him [her], putting Him [her] to grief; If He [she] would render Himself [herself] as a guilt offering, He [she] will see His [her] offspring, He [she] will prolong His [her] days, And the good pleasure of the LORD will prosper in His [her] hand. As a result of the anguish of His [her] soul, He [she] will see it and be satisfied; By His [her] knowledge the Righteous One, My Servant, will justify the many, As He [she] will bear their iniquities. Therefore, I will allot Him a portion with the great, And He will divide the booty with the strong; Because He [she] poured out Himself [herself] to death, And was numbered with the transgressors; Yet He Himself [she herself] bore the sin of many, And interceded for the transgressors...No weapon that is formed against you will prosper; Andevery tongue that accuses you in judgment you will condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, And their vindication is from Me," declares the LORD [THE authority].” Isaiah 49 & 51

So then: As you can read and as much of this has already transpired - SCOTUS was there for some of it and can and did hold it in its hands thus can’t deny that it could not create a weapon strong enough to defeat me thus defeat nature and/or The Declaration and Constitution itself - then the ending to this case has already been written and entered to the Unified Field thus SCOTUS will never, ever triumph over The People and the military. NEVER. That would constitute SCOTUS triumphing over the universe, over God. It’s not going to happen. SCOTUS then can obey its original intent and its own rulings but first The Constitution or it can go down in literal flames, as the choice is yours as that is liberty.

Volunteer to live or die but this entire universe is all voluntary. We The People volunteered and swore an oath. If what you want and need as proof of your unconstitutional and now criminal actions is The Creator smiting you out of existence? The People and the military will be more than happy to defend themselves against the likes of you. I do not have to remind you that every pay check you cash constitutes an emolument and was given to you as a bribe by a foreign authority, do I? Like this denial is not an actual or legal denial your paycheck is no longer an actual or legal paycheck but something else.

Conclusion

I know SCOTUS exactly like NY & FL truly believes it will exist if it denies me w/o responding and that when the military marches on it there will be some sort of defense it can mount. Nope, as that defense is nonexistent at that point. You may not tell me your reasoning only when you are actually under duress, as I cannot and may not accept your testimony as truth then.

Jefferson wins and John Marshall loses. For good. And all you ever had to do was hear the damn case in person. I can’t thank you enough for granting me the means to mount a military strike against you and the other crooks destroying this nation and killing its citizens.

“Those who won our independence by revolution were not cowards. They did not fear political change. They did not exalt order at the cost of liberty.” Justice Louis Brandeis

“Those who won our independence by revolution were not cowards. They also did not give a rat’s ass about their personal reputations or personal fortunes. I know I didn’t.” Chief Justice Susan Herbert as I am both the Executive and Chief Justice under martial law.

Susan Herbert, The acting, constitutional President and Commander in Chief of original jurisdiction as I am, as my will, my reasoning, my one vote, my ability to add and subtract, the equal protection and due process clauses, history such as the Revolution and Robert’s prior action and Marbury make it so.