An intervening circumstance, a federal case already filed, as I am making an attempt to collect the default judgment that I won and I do not believe people who are women, black, Jewish or Sioux will be happy when they read it: 

I, Susan Herbert, complain: 

1. On 11/09/09 I, Susan, became the very first citizen ever to receive a default judgment from SCOTUS. This happened as I have always known Bush V Gore referred to here as BVG was and is a tie that served to uncheck all offices and strip all natural born citizens of their vote thus all of their rights. It’s 5 as 1 versus 4 as 1, 1 v 1, as nothing else is legal nor is it good math. It especially harms women and enlisted service members and harmed me directly and grossly, until I suffered physical death but survived. Although this should be impossible this is what happens when SCOTUS rules wrongly and so installs a President thus makes law upon a case that has zero basis in our Constitution living or written and when it then awards the Office of the Executive to lawyers not on the ballot giving legal standing to pieces of paper not people so that SCOTUS has committed what constitutes a coup and has overthrown the Constitution but then refuses to admit to what it did only as I, Susan, the person who made the case happens to be a woman who is not a lawyer. See attachments C and 5, Herbert V Obama also in this court.

 

2. There was a fire in my home so this is a few days late. It may take me a few more days to send in one or two other parts of this case as the fire ended up destroying some documents. The facts regarding the Libertarian, Democratic and Republican Parties begin at number 7.

 

3. This complaint is brought under USC 1983 and USC Chapter 18 but firstly under the Declaration and Constitution as acts of Congress, acts of SCOTUS with the other Judiciary and acts of the sitting Executive past and current conflict with the Constitution as does law the citizens made via a direct vote of The People as nothing within the Constitution, US case law or US code allows for the citizens to make law via a direct vote, to violate the natural birth, equal protection and due process clauses via a direct vote or to target women, enlisted serviced members or me and my sons exactly via a direct vote. And nothing provides for the violation of fully vested fundamental rights which go w/o redress and w/o any actual remedy and relief as nothing grants any citizen not even Presidents and Justices blanket immunity. See US V Nixon. I also have standing to sue to enforce a judgment of default entered by SCOTUS and am in the correct court as the very first violation of a fundamental right was perpetrated by the federal government while I and my children were Navy dependents and this violation is directly linked to a former Executive and unconstitutional policy he invoked as well as a crime he committed which Congress then excused, as if it never happened. As it’s core this judgment of default occurred because every single sitting officer I came in contact with and every single citizen reasoned and decided they or other officers and/or lawyers were above the law while I and my sons were below it or less than human and as they insisted that US law provided for no remedy and relief. It is directly due to women never having been accorded actual equal protection and due process and as women have never been able to bring the case for equality before SCOTUS as it is either argued incorrectly, it is not heard w/o any reason or cause named, men not women bring it, no pro se litigants are allowed before SCOTUS and unconstitutionally so, and/or the person bringing it is unconstitutionally denied redress for the violation of her rights perpetrated by SCOTUS employees.

 

4. Jurisdiction: 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 – 1412: I have read it and this venue then would be proper as prior court activity occurred in this district and as this may be the only venue left via process of elimination. Plus as this is an authority case ANY federal venue would be appropriate as one of the concerned parties, female voters, lives here.

 

5. What began as a family case over custody escalated until I was challenging men inside SCOTUS and even SCOTUS itself as ultimately they and it caused the injury. The case spanned several states and was and is in court in three: NY, PA and FL. as the creation of impossible standards then created legal limbo; either no action is taken thus the case sits and sits or the states harm me with impunity.

 

6. The SCOTUS docket proves my claims – it along with me constitutes incontrovertible proof - but in this unique case I must now sue those involved in order to address an intrinsic flaw in the process which now denies us our rights in order to force sitting officers, whole institutions and the voters to recognize the law and my person and so the equality of women, the legal and biological reality they deny, or, to enforce the judgment of default.

 

7. Both major parties are guilty. I‘ll deal with the Republicans first: In the fall of 2004 I went to a political rally sponsored by the Republicans at which George Bush Jr. was to appear. Ultimately I received the shock of my life, as I am a witness to genocide born in the US. For years sociologists have been looking for this answer as have I. Scientists could name the elements and which conditions did not seem to matter; they could not name the cycle or the pattern or if they had every element or how they came together. I can answer this question due to the Republican Party.

 

8. Several elements do need to exist plus they do come together in a very specific way and scientists are wrong: I now know what comes before the eruption of mass violence so that I can state as fact what happened in Rwanda may have been longer in coming then anyone ever imagined. The best way I know how to say it to a federal judge: An event such BVG or 9/11 occurs; there seems to be an escalation of fear plus injustice. BVG is very, very important – what it is and does to cause genocide is intrinsic – but 9/11 is not very consequential because all it needs to be is anything the leaders can use as an excuse to act unjustly or create more irrational fear, what I named suspicious fear: be suspicious; be worried; your neighbor may be your enemy; you can’t see your enemy. It’s a rev up. Then all necessary elements are realized in one time and one place and so genocide ripens. I saw the event that no one ever saw before; when and how it ripens so that mass violence may erupt. At this point it’s possible as the ‘machine’ is in place and the people did it once so it is then alive and what I witnessed and what I know tell me that IS how Nazi Germany was born and nobody realized it but not what Rwanda saw as Rwanda had no central cult personality surrounded by ‘officers’ who actually did all the dirty work.  However I can answer the questions about Rwanda, as now I know what no other person ever knew.

 

9. This sounds awful; it is. Bush Jr. is not guilty; he had no idea what happened before he arrived and I saw him flinch when a person held up a sign reading Jews for Bush. Why? The hate speech, that’s why. I saw Jews cheering for their own extinction, women cheering for their own extinction and enlisted service members cheering for their own extinction. The news is not all bad: As I was there the US can now own up to it and then take credit for giving the world an answer that can stop genocide forever. The whole event is on tape and I have a witness: A Vietnam Veteran as it seemed that only he and I and perhaps a few other Veterans knew something had gone horribly wrong. I, Susan, knew the exact word  - genocide - and so I became terrified and fled for my life.

 

10. We know BVG and everything that happened up to fall 2004 – a time before we knew it is a bad declaration of war. The Republicans said you had to arrive 5 hours before the event or you couldn’t get in. 5 hours in the baking sun in FL in a football stadium; it was an oven. To get in you had to pass through ‘security guards’ – members of the Republican Party or at least the guy who touched me was. They began roughing people up. They began confiscating silly things only to throw them out as if you had to leave it they were dumping it not leaving it for you to claim. So a mood developed.

 

11. Now we’re in the stadium. As it heats up the concession stands are charging outrageous prices for drinks and food. You have five hours of this. Then the toilets overflow all over the stadium. It is getting worse and worse and worse. I can feel the mood shifting and I begin to realize what I might be witnessing but I keep telling myself it’s impossible. I’m thinking this can’t be but I know genocide so the only word I have is ripen, maybe this is how it ripens so then the possibility of mass violence exists at any time; maybe it’s not possible until it ripens. I now know that’s it, it must ripen. Something is made physically real. Exacting thoughts, feelings, ideas and beliefs along with motivation and intent combined with issues regarding power, victimization, justification not justice and morals not ethics is made real. The otherwise ‘good’ civilians doing it? They are the targeted victims and do not even know it; they are unaware they have been actively ‘recruited’ to participate and so do not know they have been deliberately targeted. This is important, as coming into play in order to keep the recruited participants unaware is a cycle of blame, shame, anger and guilt.

 

12. A Vietnam Veteran sits down. Everybody is talking and he begins talking about John Kerry; he’s not here to ask you to vote for Bush as he’s here to tell us: WHATEVER YOU DO YOU CAN NOT VOTE FOR KERRY; EVEN DON’T VOTE AS LONG AS YOU DO NOT CAST YOUR VOTE FOR KERRY. He has no idea who he’s voting for due to the candidates – none of them are fit; none of them are safe. You’re either safe or not; safety is or not.  There’s no such thing as a little safety or a little liberty.  So people start asking him questions.

 

13. I listen to him talking and I stop him: I have a question: “I know about the Swift boats; I hear Swift boat everything. Now you just said something – unfit for command. I don’t need to know about Swift Boats. Why did you, a person not here to vote for Bush and a veteran just say unfit for command like you did? What’s YOUR reasoning?” So he said, “He lied about the return of his medals.” I reply, “Okay now I know: Violation of a renegotiated honor bound contract. He’s unfit to command.” This happens to be one of the most grievous offenses you can commit. You give up your medals as it is your claims THE PEOPLE have violated the Declaration and Constitution wholly and absolutely in your case. You are no longer a party to the contract. If things change and the contract is renegotiated the President representing THE PEOPLE reawards your medals. At that point? You had better not look sideways if looking sideways is a violation. A lie? A violation.  Cheating? A violation. Running for any office when not fit to serve? A violation. This nation needs to get right with itself: all the proof I ever wanted or needed was that Veteran saying he came here on his day off not to vote for Bush but to stop me from voting for Kerry. If he said or did nothing else that is the proof. I believe Vietnam Veterans: I do not believe one of them: John Kerry. How many veterans have to tell me if you elect that man you might be killed? 1. Not 2, not 20, not 75 but 1.

 

14. So all day long things worsen, it’s more heaped on top of what feels as if it is unbearable, it’s like a sewer, until the hate speech begins. Like nothing I have ever heard in my life. The speakers begin and it is insanity from the get go; it has been building up all day as there were acts like musicians every once in a while so a person would grab a mike and blurt something out or they would broadcast something to ‘entertain’ us while we waited. It is a mixture of politicians and party leaders plus well known locals. An ex-Model named Kim Alexis gives a speech. [Kim Alexis is a person, a good person, who then participated. Why? I know why. This is my reasoning for naming her - not as she’s guilty but as she has some of the most priceless living testimony ever as she was there and she did it but she did not know.] From among the speakers she stood out as she’s a woman and a mother and her words made my blood run cold. Certain words and slogans are repeated ad infinitum. Bloody, bloody, baby, women, Christian, bloody, murder, and on and on. Men get up. Jesus, bloody, baby, women, murder, drugs. THIS IS A CHRISTIAN NATION. Over and over and over. You think it’ll stop or somebody will react but they do not. Now it’s bloody, baby, women, WAR, JESUS, WAR, bloody, Christian, abortion, bloody. I’m getting more and more concerned. I’m watching it all, taking it all in as now I know: I am about to see how genocide is born; I’m gonna know – how did the Nazis do it, why good people did it and why the Jews didn’t act. I want the court to note: I always knew I’d have to give this answer to the Jews then the rest if the world. Once I knew I was actually seeing it? I captured it all in my minds eye paying special attention to: the emotions. Those I captured in my body; you can sort of internalize them to recall them later. It’s a gift, as I have an instrument that is perfectly calibrated – my ears – as I listen different, with my entire person; I record or memorize things differently than other people do. It’s related to how I process language so that I experience the actual whole truth while others experience only a part of it or miss it completely. I was experiencing the truth of the whole event in that stadium; others missed it entirely while that Veteran knew most of it. That’s because: If your person matches US law in letter and sprit, if you have those same beliefs and practice them, your emotional compass is very finely tuned. Mine happens to be perfectly calibrated the way a perfumer has a perfectly calibrated nose or a taste tester has a perfectly calibrated tongue. It’s what makes me such a deadly constitutional attorney: If an argument or ruling – or a belief - does not match the Constitution? I’ll know it and I’ll know exactly what it is and why. It will light up like a Christmas tree for me. Then I can read what the Justices wrote and know: This is what the lawyer needs or this is what they all missed or this is where the Justices erred. Sometimes I will read one or two sentences and know; other times the caption alone will tell me. Often I can even identify what mistaken belief specific people involved in the case have as it’s all over the paper but they do not realize it, as they aren’t doing what I’m doing. As people produce paper? I can listen to a piece of paper the same way I can listen to a person.

 

15. The stadium feels like it is filling up with water, as if we’ll drown, and the crowd is cheering insanely and then suddenly on the jumbotron is a JEWS FOR BUSH sign. The crowd cheers; Bush flinches – he knows something is wrong as it is the way they cheered – only he says something like  “We’re a Christian nation but there’s room for Jews too.” And there it was; it ripened: This crowd let up a roar EXACTLY like the People hearing Hitler let out. It’s distinctive; I will never forget the sound and feeling of it. The extreme physical discomfort; the extreme heat and smell of the overflowing bathrooms; the anger; the nonstop hate speech; the imagery, very detailed ideas of graphic violence regarding women and babies but labeled Christianity, mixed with the emotions that were swirling around as if waves washing over the participants and the sound of that roar rising like an expectant release of joy, eagerness, but joy for violence and death; a religious fervor for a political agenda whether it is constitutional or not and no matter who it harms, so urgent even your own person is expendable for the good of the cause. The sound that the crowd made in that one incredible roar was deeper and more intense than any cheering I have ever heard but the intensity of the emotion is what frightened me the most, as if these people were made to be temporarily insane, actually insane, as they were feeling joy but expressing the idea of blood and death for no named reason, so that expressing this insane idea purposely – This is a Christian nation - to then feel that emotion became their cause and became their reason. If they expressed that idea – those words in that order no matter how senseless they are in the context of America - they were rewarded with that emotion – joy  - so death and the idea of killing women and babies made them feel good as it cannot be murder if Christians do it. The emotion itself became their god; the emotion itself became their cause and they would say or do anything to get it. I do not like to use the word joy, perhaps joy infused with pride, you’re proud to be killing women in the name of Jesus, as to feel this you need to have other people around you who engage in a sort of give and take. It’s as if you need that outside approval to then feel the emotion, that to get that approval is to then be able to feel it. I witnessed what happens when individuals have had their sense of self annihilated to such an extent and degree that they then ‘adopt’ a collective created sense of self, a sense of self that is located completely outside each person so that if the group  promotes it you  then identify with it – you are it or so you truly believe – thus you feel good when you express it, even it is insensible like equating Christianity with death instead of life. You have traded your will for the will of the crowd; you have replaced I with us, not we. The people in that crowd could not tell you what they were cheering for if you asked them; all they could do is say exact words but not delineate any actual concept or any actual belief. Human emotion without any reason; unconditional pride. The Nazis had unconditional pride; it was their sense of self; it was directly wired to their id but that id only exists as a group. It doesn’t exist if the group doesn’t exist. Each individual had wholly conditional love, hate, directly wired to his or her ego. It’s human emotion without reason as a group and human reason without emotion as an individual. It’s how and why each individual could be so brutal – they felt so good doing it. It’s how and why they were such effective killing machines, as they could operate either in a group or alone. Compare it to what you know: How hard does a group have to work to get even one person to do what he or she would never do, such as convince a person to commit rape only as the others in the group pressure him? How hard does a group have to work to convince one person to do something ‘smaller’ like rob? It used to be impossible in America; now it is common and nobody blinks.  Kill reason first by battering them with words, render them powerless – they must feel powerless both mentally and physically – and then insert a new idea over a long period of time but do it in such a way you make them truly believe it as real, ‘it’s America’, as you cement it inside them with that one, massive, final blow: visual imagery, auditory imagery – all of your senses being attacked  - and with a wallop of emotion that feels unbelievably fantastic. But I felt terrified. I know now that a person could have held up a sign that read Kill The Jews and I would have heard that same roar as long as the person ‘leading’ the crowd condoned it and so did the guy sitting next to you. Hitler’s big lie only it is bigger and much more insidious than anyone ever suspected.

 

16. At that exact moment it felt as if the water had risen over my head and I was going to drown; I was actually going to die. I was going to suffocate. Nobody was stopping it; I knew exactly what had to happen for mass violence to erupt. I knew I could do something exactly and we’d have mass violence. And somebody might do that accidentally. I took one look at that Veterans face and fled for my life. He was silent and he had a look of confusion and revulsion on his face; his silence was different as it was as if he couldn’t move. He KNEW something had gone horribly wrong but he did not have the word “genocide” in his head or he would have had a different look on his face. The person I attended this event with? That person was cheering; he had no idea what had happened and when I fled he kept trying to tell me that I was ‘crazy’ and making it up; he was absolutely clueless as to what he had just been deceived into doing. He absolutely, positively did not hear the lie he was just told, the lie of his life, the most lethal and deadliest lie of all: They will think for me; I don’t have to think; I don’t have to feel.

 

17. I then went back over the record of genocide that we have. Nazi Germany and Rwanda are the same; it’s the same but it is realized a slightly different way. It has to do with power and control; a created fear; there’s a rev up or a cycle; there’s an event, a moment in time where it ripens; and if one thing happens after that point? Mass violence will erupt unless the chain set in motion is broken. Genocide is already, before mass violence erupts. You might slaughter people in one day or you do it a few at a time in an illegal war or at home killing women; it might take you five years to kill them all but it’s mass violence and is genocide. In person I can go over this in fine detail and reason it all for you. I have to do this for all citizens but especially for all political parties so they never go here again. I also have to break or sever the chain set in motion with BVG as once it ripened? That chain was never broken; it is still in motion today and is being realized various ways like the John Woo memos discussing if they could invoke martial law to then use the military to lock up Americans w/o cause, w/o any hearing or trial and w/o any charges.  Yes, in concentration like camps. Those memos are more serious than anyone knows. What has not yet happened is the sudden explosion of violence, which is not so sudden but only appears to be. If the American people want to know who the Hitler in their midst is I will tell them and trust me, if I could not prove this beyond any doubts – not reasonable doubt but any doubt – I would not say it: Dick Cheney. Cheney should be very afraid of me, as there’s a whole lot of things that he did that he truly believes he has gotten away with; things he is certain no one will ever know or couldn’t know, things I can prove. I’m not ‘figuring out’ who did what as I know as fact without any question whatsoever as following a chain of people is easy for me. Cheney might believe he did something behind closed doors so you can’t know but you can; if you have my unique skill you can follow that chain anywhere and know anything.

 

18. I do not want say much more about this event on paper. It’s too important.

 

19. The Republican Party has a federal ruling against it involving voting in which they were not do certain things again and guess what? They never stopped doing them and no matter how many people pointed this out nobody did a thing to enforce that federal ruling. Not in 2004 or in 2008.  The Party has no plan to ever obey that ruling or so I was told.

 

20. The Republican Party is hoping to nominate Arnold Swarzeneggar to its ticket in 2012 and/or 2016. They have been promoting this idea all over. You know, first you agree to seat a foreigner who doesn’t sound like one and then you can seat one that does sound like one and when we complain? They will cry: If Obama sat why can’t Arnold sit? It’s a violation of EP&DP to discriminate against people from Austria but not those subject to the British Crown.  Arnold Swarzeneggar will not sit in that office before I do, and then he’ll never sit in that office ever, and Obama should not have.

 

21. The Republican Party is now placing unqualified people on its ticket; they know these people are unqualified thus what they are doing is treason as they are overthrowing the office of the executive, but they do it regardless. And at the expense of women, blacks and American Indians. WAR VETERAN is not a reason to commit a crime; nor is it a reason to violate our rights. I have a few choice words for John McCain as I too am a war veteran and I too was a prisoner of war - we can compare scars – and I too was tortured – I can describe intimately what torture is and does and what it feels like when you get to that point where you’re gonna break or you’re gonna survive. I too had to make a choice: Do I cut and run or remain a prisoner? For at least ten years? It would be ten years at the least. I remained. McCain said he did it as it wouldn’t be fair to the other prisoners. I did it as I would not be able to live with myself afterwards and as nothing would change my children would be injured as adults; I did it as if I’m the only hope these people have – if I don’t do this it will never be done and these people and this nation will die – then: I have no other choice. I have never once used WAR VETERAN as a reason for anything let alone an excuse. I know: I’m not above the law. I’m like everyone else as we all have one vote. Susan Versus John McCain? McCain is never gonna be my equal when it comes to moral authority.

 

22. The Republican Party has manipulated and controlled the system and hogged the ballot for more than a hundred years. It’s time for it to step aside. What happens? That’s up to the People who are the Party. I would like to see some of the Republican and Democratic Party leaders in jail but it’s not up to me; it’s up to the people who are the party and to The People, the constitutionally set government. Republicans can volunteer to jettison the leaders who did this, to begin obeying the law, to not assume one of the top two slots on all 50 ballots for the next few elections and work to fix how we even manage campaigns as there’s a problem and a big one with PACS and I have the case as I am the case, or they can volunteer to cease to exist.

 

23. The Democrats: The Democratic Party is a vile animal these days. If Kerry were not enough they gave us Bill Clinton too. Do they HATE Americans or what? The Democrats told us: We will elect anybody at all, even crooks and foreigners, as long as we do not elect someone we actually victimized. You can appear to be black, you just can’t actually be black. The Parties have both been engaging in propaganda and conditioning tactics. I don’t know who’s worse. Like this: A person who is black tells me Obama is one of us and will help us. One of us? Yeah, you know – a victim. Victim? Obama’s mother is white; she and her family were not victims of slavery. Obama’s father is Kenyan. He and his family were not victims of slavery. Obama claims to have suffered from discrimination. Nope, as look – he doesn’t even qualify and he made it into the office. If it were discrimination he suffered from then he wouldn’t be sitting. But you know how I know he is lying when he says he is a victim? He looks like the majority population of Hawaii. Most Hawaiians are not white as Hawaii has an indigenous population. He also grew up in Indonesia; he looks like the majority population of Indonesia. He doesn’t really look different thus he was not treated differently as in black versus white. This man is no victim; he only needs you to believe he is. Listen to how careful this constitutional lawyer is: you do realize he was careful to say My wife’s family is related to slaves and were slaves as if by being married to her he is then a victim too? When I point this out to people they are stunned. They are not hearing it. And then the things they do hear: Everyone can name Hawaii. So nobody stops to reason what the Hawaiians who are Native look like? Yes as they are absoluting everything to death instead of connecting it. Discrimination causes a physical injury; it actually affects your brain. It causes your brain to sort of cross wires as it’s about annihilation of self. You confuse id with ego; you lose the human ability to feel liberty as an emotion and physical sensation. It truly does dumb you down. Nobody is hearing the truth due to the injury: Using words to make it seem as if, a thing lawyers do too well. Democrats took it to a new level as they used imagery too such as the “Office of the President Elect”, a make believe office with its own podium, own news conferences and own great seal. People truly believe it’s a named office. How severely have the people been injured? I found out: Incapacitation. Lawyers did it for politicians and then did it for businesses; it escalated and became the norm and went on for so long the people suffer a form of brainwashing named in the DSM. I can fix it, as I know how to heal this injury.  But I’ll give you an example of what this injury does to a person:

 

24. I ask a person: “I believe John Kerry is unfit for command”. Is that a fact? The person hesitates and finally She: Yes, Kerry is unfit. Me: I know if Kerry is fit or unfit. I asked you about your belief not Kerry. You think there is a right or wrong answer, as if one is good or bad. You were hesitating as you were trying to figure out what answer I wanted you to say so instead you...answered a question I did not ask. I asked is this your belief? Is it a fact of you? So, somebody in your world has taught you that some beliefs are good and some are bad. Nope. They are. Now, did you even hear what I asked? Say that statement in your head like this: If you ask me that same thing I’d answer this way: I, Susan, believe Kerry is unfit. I do. Okay, YES, it is a fact – a fact of me; my fact is I do posses this belief. But you answered,  “Yes, Kerry is unfit.” Can you answer my question the other way? Can you answer it ‘No, Kerry is not unfit’? You know what else? If I make that statement to you then ask you if it is a fact? You can’t answer it at all unless you ask me what my belief is! When this happens it is about self-awareness and sense of self. “I believe”: You don’t see quotes when a person speaks!

 

25. People “can’t believe” what they did. They’re stunned. And guess what? The Democrats exploited this very injury. How deep does this go? Deep as now it is everywhere. LAWYERS did it to America. So did speechwriters. People are hammered all day long with this, even on the news. Thus a person goes to a poll to vote and although they have been conditioned to vote for a certain candidate they don’t know it so they truly believe they made a choice born of will and liberty when no, they are operating upon that conditioning on a subconscious level and then the carefully chosen words that serve to deliberately steer their choice so it is NOT their choice and is NOT voluntary.  This is exactly how bad it is and how deep is it is:

 

26. A commercial now running says this: “Studies show 1 out of 4 women can misread a pregnancy test”. CAN? As in ability? 1 out of 4 women have the human ability to....make a mistake! Who reads a pregnancy test incorrectly on purpose? Who deliberately reads it incorrectly? Or by accident? Oops! I accidentally looked at my own pregnancy test! No, it is 1 out of 4 women have the human ability to make a mistake. Now, what studies? It says “Studies show”. Not even a recent study but a generic “studies”. You mean millions and billions of our tax dollars went into finding out if human beings can make mistakes? Is it possible humans make mistakes? And if possible do humans then act with deliberation to make mistakes? Well, I gotta tell this court: I know what “studies” these are; I know every one of them. Since the dawn of man we have tested, studied and determined mistakes. I can even name the very first scientific study regarding mistakes ever made: Eve made a mistake and we were off. Government was born! Ever since then we have thought about mistakes, considered mistakes and examined mistakes. Man debates and argues and promotes his mistakes in study after study. Man and mistakes: Our own Founders studied mistakes. They went all over the world studying them. They read about them, watched them and collected the details of them. They then designed the largest, grandest most important study ever conducted to answer this question: Can man govern himself, or, is he doomed to always and forever make a mistake from which he cannot recover? It took over 200 years for this study to be completed. In November of 2000 the study was finished. I was floored: Why, it seems the Founders never considered what if the conclusion of the experiment itself IS the mistake man never recovers from every time? What if nobody knows the study has been concluded??? Or nobody knows the mistake??? Time to review our mistakes! Is this the most perfect form of government on Earth? I am!  I could have saved that drug company billions. As it is they might owe me billions. Notice they aren’t telling us that 1 out of 4 men make mistakes. It’s only women who have the human ability to make mistakes as if men can correctly read a pregnancy test 100% of the time and perfectly do everything 100% the time. Well, make no mistake: Every time I ask someone what that commercial is saying they tell me that 25% of the time pregnancy tests are wrong as in the test itself is defective but mostly, almost exclusively, I hear this: women can’t read them as they are confused. As in can’t understand directions. Not one person realizes he has just been told women can and do make mistakes 1 out of 4 times – if a pregnancy test is involved. What? Do women make a mistake 1 out of 4 times when breathing? Opening a can of soda? Hmmm, in all I do all day long am I, Susan, making a mistake 25 % of the time? Will the Creator tell me upon death: Susan, 25% of everything you ever did was a mistake.  I’m not kidding: one woman said when she first heard it she thought dumb as in such a dumb woman would need to go back to school and men have told me that they do truly believe women are less than men – a SCOTUS clerk told me this and even said he did not believe the Constitution applied to women and some of that is because of crap like this as he does not even know he is absorbing it as fact and truth as it’s so subtle and feeds into the pre-existing injury  - and when I asked men about this ad some did assume it was something women did like couldn’t read the test or the instructions; as if it was about how women are: DUMB.  Dumb is a state of being for women; it is a fact of men that women are dumb. I understand directions perfectly; I follow them perfectly. Watch me perfectly follow the directions in the Federalist Papers and so sue this company for LYING to the public thus harming women as it implies and infers WOMEN ARE CREATED DEFECTIVE thus it is their unchangeable nature and uses brain washing to do it. It says one of us makes mistakes while three of us are perfect and that’s a lie, false advertising, as all women  - 100% - CAN misread a pregnancy test so 1 out of 300 million Americans WILL sue: You did not say 4 out of 4 women can misread a pregnancy test and I know why: The jig is up if you said that, isn’t it? This drug company did not make a mistake. It acted with deliberation.

 

27. Exactly as everything these Parties did is deliberate. Don’t believe me? Joe Trippi of the Democratic Party, the guy who worked for Dean, wrote a book; it’s called “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised”. He told me to use the internet to steal this seat, to take private funds for the first time since 1976 to steal this seat, and to figure out a way to motivate the 47% of low income people who never vote to then vote if I wanted to win just for the sake of winning as it was about winning. He even told me that I should look for a minority person, as these voters are mostly low income. This sounds like a plan. That somebody decided to follow to the letter: I saw a magazine cover that read (not exact): “How the kid who owns Facebook chose a President”. It was all about how the internet, namely Facebook, was used to seat Obama and that w/o Facebook no Obama. I, with my own ears, heard Obama say he was going to take private money for the first time since 1976.  Then I saw the Democrats desperate and scared.  I also saw the wealthy men who control them gleam as they knew: We finally managed to gain control of it all; all we gotta do is make it seem as if we are electing a black person when really we’re electing a foreigner as the only thing we can’t get past now is a victim...if an actual victim sits our goose is cooked so we can make it seem as if but we just can’t elect a person who was one of our victims. We can even nominate a woman who used to be a man but had a sex change operation as long as it isn’t one of our actual victims. And a black guy who isn’t would then motivate those 47% of the voters we’ve never been able to motivate...you know they’ll vote for us thus making it seem as if he’s way more popular than he actually is. Nobody will ever realize the actual numbers tell a different story and who will ever check the actual facts? We can do this! Now, did I or did I not hear that this election brought out more voters than any election we could remember? None of this is mistake.

 

28. Even if we assume everything Barack Obama ever said or did his whole entire life is a fact it is also a fact that he signed 511. He unqualified himself then. But not one Party member noticed? Not any members of the Democratic Party knew of that document? At least two signed it. No Republicans knew of it? So what did they do? Did both parties collude? As it seems as if they had a silent agreement to remain silent when 511 was passed – approved by the Judiciary Committee – as nobody in either Party said a word.

 

29. The two major parties do not abide by their own party philosophy. If you look around you can’t discern any difference at all between the two but if you then compare how they act, what they create and how they vote against their platforms you see they do not follow their own party ‘agenda’. This too is a way The People are being conditioned. A voter I know was shocked, he actually did not know, when he realized that these people have zero in common with their stated beliefs. He could not get over how very far from these stated beliefs the party members act and that Americans aren’t up in arms and fighting back. He truly believed his fellow citizens liked this, wanted this and were condoning and promoting this until he read those platforms.

 

30. The Libertarian Party: They have a plank calling or foreignization. Or they did when last I checked. That’s not free speech – it’s a crime known as treason as you’re organizing and collecting money to then overthrow the Executive thus overthrow The People.

 

31. I’d keep going as I have lists and lists of things each party has done but it’s not necessary as I’m not here to make a case as it is already made and won. I’m here to enforce my judgment thus what I need is to be able to teach the people what they need to know to heal the injury and to protect themselves from these nasty tactics in the future. I also need these two parties to admit to everything they did and the Libertarian Party to remove the foreignization plank if they still have it. As they’re so good at raising so much money? They can offer me some. And big business had better not get any ideas as they need me; this is gonna go one way or the other and so their only question should be “Do we want to survive as a company?” as if you do then I am your only hope. Without me? You do not have that hope as I’m the only person alive with the solutions as only I can hit China up with a bigger fear than they named. Only I can exert power and authority over the likes of China and then the other nations, as only I know exactly what to use and how to use it. China wants to call in that debt the parties created and/or seize US interests? China said it’d nuke us; China said it would bomb us. Too bad for China as that threat is empty and I know it so all I have to do is tell planet Earth by giving it the science. The royal families of Europe told me that they would NEVER give up the money they make off of the backs of their American serf/slaves without their consent and against their will. Too bad for royalty everywhere then as all I have to do is deal with one, Queen Elizabeth: You don’t want to see it any way but my way as you made a mistake or you made the greatest, most important decision of your life as you gave your subjects the right to dissolve you when you agreed to pay income tax.  I took the liberty of informing them in SCOTUS Petition 07-9804, In Re Susan, as Gordon Brown is not my cup of tea and he refuses to hold a vote; I informed them that all they have to do is order you to remove Brown so they can and will vote in a person who understands what an honor bond is; that Brown has no choice but to obey your order as the Queen defends her subjects – The British People -  not any office or title.  Given a choice between Parliament and the Queen? If it means the British people have actual power and authority thus control over their destiny and fate and that the monarchy is no longer a meaningless, empty, vacuous, luxury hog with too much time on their hands and too little to do then I know as fact without question exactly who the British people will choose: Queen Elizabeth as she, not Gordon Brown, secured the right of dissolution for them. The rest of European royalty had better start looking for jobs or merely agree to see it my way thus act for the people they now lord over. Nobody, no nation on Earth or even all of Earth acting as one, has more moral authority than the US so businesses and the lawyers they hire can try it as can the uberwealthy and so can another nation but they will lose each and every time as they cannot defeat what Susan owns: The truth.  My greatest concern?

 

32. I witnessed the Democrats do something I thought I’d never, ever see. I mean never:  Traditionally it has been very difficult to get American Indians to agree to harm themselves. Traditionally they fight wars over this very idea, as they do not surrender to what is unconstitutional. Traditionally their war cry is they'd rather be dead than be injured by their own hand - I live in the home of the Seminole, the Unconquered People, as the entire federal government with the US military couldn't defeat them  - and I’m Native American so I have no idea what Obama offered them that is so damn attractive other than that false appearance and that is it: they have no idea they were told a lie and that they are victimizing their own persons, that what the Europeans couldn’t do to them in over 400 years and then the entire federal government and US military couldn't do to them in over 200 of those years the Democratic Party did in only a few months: They gave up their traditions, their true beliefs about constitutional authority.

 

33. As long as a natural born American sits American Indians have the hope that they can ascend to this office someday as currently they do not qualify. If criminals and foreigners sit? There is no hope for any American Indian. No foreign power has any interest in the American Indian and criminals by their very nature have no interest in the ethical. They will, as question without fact, become extinct. [I love this Freudian slip; I’m keeping it.] It has to do with dual citizenship and numbers, as we almost did exterminate them and they realize the effects of discrimination distinctly, like persons who are black but in a distinct manner as we prevented them from practicing their religion while blacks were able to practice it. For all the advantages American Indians had over blacks that were brought here in chains they suffer worse and the attrition rate is higher. It’s not only a compounding of effects but of never having been able to achieve in any actual manner that then caused truly effective change. They never had a Thurgood Marshall and they may be dead before that ever happens if the injury is not addressed. You harm all children when you harm their mothers and it is from your mother that you get your will, your ideas of spirituality and right and wrong. If you harm mothers in such a way they can’t teach their children and then compound that with outlawing religious expression so the entire group is existing on sheer will alone you rip a hole in the group so wide and deep it is nearly impossible to survive, as you can’t replace the people you are losing. You not only lose the physical bodies but you lose the knowledge, the traditions regarding how to do things the old way and the sacred traditions. It’s as if an always fatal disease is ever present among you so you constantly teeter on the brink.  All that kept American Indians from succumbing up to now was constitutional authority. Constitutional authority allows American Indians to defy the federal government. That kind of will is inviolate; I know as I have it. Man cannot survive on will alone but if it’s constitutional authority he can survive long enough then get to a place whereby he can thrive. If all American Indians had was that ego based will that is decidedly European in nature they never, ever would have made it this long.  It is the will born of id, the same will our Founders had, that kept them going through it all. And for the first time ever they are giving it away; they are being broken and do not know it. I, Susan, know as fact w/o question that if this is not addressed American Indians will not survive as an ethnic group and most likely will not survive at all as American Indians have not been able to access any of our institutions.  I do not mean government institutions only but all institutions across the board.  They have never been able to recover to a point whereby they could begin thriving again. Constitutional authority is their only natural resource and they can’t lose it before they are accorded justice or they will not make it.  So I know, I absolutely know that If somebody does not stop the Democratic Party and restore constitutional authority to the American Indians the political parties are going to slaughter the American Indians once and for all.

 

34. I, Susan, have a better idea than any of the political parties: The American Indians told me they needed justice and that meant the land. Specifically the Ft. Laramie land. I did not ask if they would accept something else. As no person ever revisited the issue on their behalf I did. I, Susan, can and may return that land but my plan involves American Indians becoming full citizens by choice, upon their own will and liberty without any force or coercion.  They can accept or reject my plan with zero consequences imposed on them by the US. The use of the land patent gives American Indians the land back while preserving it for all Americans and still allows them to live as a group, collectively. I can and will legally argue a land patent that is royal in charter – the rarest of all - plus something else: I can and will argue one that is divine in charter. The treaty I entered covers a part of FL, Spanish granted by royal charter. Who gave the Spanish king the right to seize land in the new world? This royal charter is derived from one granted by the Pope. As I’m catholic I then pursued this papal claim all the way back to Jesus and then even earlier, to Abraham and before. I can legally document it to the earliest Christian church due to the Vatican records; I can then use sacred works that all match to legally prove it then goes back to Adam and Eve. That’s legal. The law has evolved from what began as divine not secular law; our legal roots are to be found within salvation history, the history of the metaphysical or of who and what you are as a people. Later they became secular codes most notably when Mohammed introduced Islam and most recently when we introduced the Declaration naming rights granted by God, rights that are inalienable as they  came into being with this universe.  Scientifically I can reason it all the way back to the void as I resolved Uniformity. I know the design of the universe and how it all works. I know the smallest particle. I can prove everything I claim. I’m not presenting anything like “We will find the Higgs particle when we turn the collider on; it should exist”. No it doesn’t. It is not that as I already found it. I can reason this fully so that anybody can understand it. I can even bring a simple experiment to court so that the court can then see for itself. This answer was much simpler than anyone imagined. The problem arguing science in a court of law? There isn’t a problem if you know there is a legal burden of proof standard that is not the same as the scientific burden of proof standard. Lawyers do not know what to ask for and scientists would never use what a lawyer does so they have been entering the incorrect proof. Science has it but lawyers never asked; when a lawyer asks a scientist for proof? A scientist is thinking controls, laboratories and numbers. A court of law does accept that at times such as a court will accept DNA. DNA may prove paternity while it would not prove evolution. Blood may be entered as proof of a person having worn a shirt when he was shot and killed, a bloody shirt, but it’s not proof until or unless the person who shot him says “He was wearing that exact shirt when I shot him.”  But blood alone would never prove murder. I know what a court needs; I know what court of law needs, a court of science needs and even the Vatican court needs. It’s not the same. As I can do this American Indians would have a land patent both royal and divine, a land patent so inviolate all that can break it is the extinction of American Indians, as I can argue it back to the beginning of the universe but in doing so then also prove the Creator is reality and did create the universe and then the multiverse. I can and will prove mankind truly did receive sovereignty over Earth from that Creator and this then would give everyone what they needed and also give American Indians security as land patents have never been ruled against by SCOTUS  - they do not break less strict ones; it has never happened and only the College of William and Mary has a royal one or so I was told – plus it then makes American Indians a part of the electorate as our Founders named land owners as the electorate and we are not ready to jettison that yet or so it seems. American Indians would not only vote but elect the President thus making up for the disparity they suffer.  This is not only possible it is easily doable; it can happen any time this nation wants to make it happen. It was not and is not impossible; all any person had to be was motivated so they wouldn’t quit; all any person had to do was vow to succeed or die trying and be willing to look at the problem any and all ways whether they personally liked it or not. All any person had to do was accept it as fact: It’s the land or nothing and these people have no reason to trust you so you can’t settle for what everybody else has; you can’t offer them a solution that can then be violated by persons with everything already. To that end I borrowed my idea from the Sioux: If a white man in 2009 gets a land patent, a regular old land patent, or has no land patent but owns property, then secure for the ‘least’ privileged group the strictest, securest land patent of all. The white man then has a vested interest in the Indian as that Indian is going to vote for the President and that Indian will be here forever and ever as land patents do not expire when you die but pass on to your heirs in perpetuity. The Indian has a vested interest in the white man as his land is not so secure and the Indian can never afford to have this government fall no matter what or else he will lose his inviolate patent to criminals and foreigners. Both then not only have the same interests but power and authority is leveraged in such a way each needs the other. [This is about allodial title, actual allodial title.]

 

35. Do not worry: I have answers for black citizens – any and all minorities - and for women and lots of them. You drove me too as I was never so livid as when I heard the political parties say they couldn’t find one able, capable, qualified black person who is a victim of slavery – the effects of which are still ongoing – in all of the United States. Not one. You’re all as unable and as stupid as women are. They had zero qualified candidates as they looked and looked and couldn’t find a single one.  So desperate to find qualified blacks and qualified women were they that they passed resolutions and made phony law to help us: they empowered and qualified war veterans born overseas and half-Americans.  I said, “No – what you can’t have is one of two things: A person you harmed who means to get revenge or a person you harmed who means to end injustice once and for all, as that then is no more unjust privilege for you.” They are afraid; they are cowards. What they need to be is ashamed and remorseful but I’m not waiting around for that to happen.  I made sure I did not enter until I could argue for everyone even if surprised at the last second. I had to be able to do it cold, with no notes, no books, no help – nothing but my own person.  That took a while. It only became possible in 2006. I made certain I could bring everyone with me when I entered the bar so when we begin again in 2012 with the vote we all begin together, not all with the same wealth and same amount of material goods but with the same opportunity. If I can do it with nothing then you can too but most of you have some resources and you have something I did not: Me today with all of the answers as when I began this I had only me without any of the answers. No person has to worry that I wasn’t considering you as I considered all of you, even white men: I’m a hardliner: Equal protection and due process is an inviolate law of this universe. It’s how you perfect the practice of unconditional love otherwise known as the Declaration and the Constitution.

 
 

Susan Herbert