Default has landed in Sioux City

The court that became the default court is the Sioux City Iowa Federal Court. Of every court I petitioned only Sioux City obeyed the law; they came to the wrong conclusion but they could not know two things: I stood down all 100 Senators and 511 had not been passed yet. Their ruling came too late to appeal it and as I knew they had not violated the law I then knew I could always return with a SCOTUS docket you could only reconcile with the criminal code as well as the paper Congress is producing as once 511 passed then the federal bench has the proof the injury is real and ongoing: 511 stripped from the federal judiciary the power to interpret the law. Hey federal judiciary, if you're injured and you don't know it mighn't that be proof that propaganda is being used against you? I mean if you're the federal bench then you would know if your vote is legal and/or if lawyers were screwing you over...or would you? What if the SCOTUS clerks kept the knowledge contained within action 11/20/08 re foreignization, Obama and BVG from you by not filing it? If you knew everything I knew about BVG and foreignization, if you knew Obama is an attempt by lawyers and bankers to permanently install what is British in lieu of what is American, would you have ever cast your vote as you did? If you knew why every person on that ballot was unconstitutional and so disqualified would you have participated in election 2008?

All I asked Sioux City to do is enforce the default judgment; I said "I demand that this court enforce this ruling by making all of these people appear and acknowledge the original Declaration and Constitution and my authority thus acknowledging that The People are the constitutionally set government." My plan is to get an appearance in person to force these people to read the law out loud thus establish their constitutional basis to act or to even exist as an office holder at all. Take John McCain; where does it say WAR VETERANS may collect and spend tax dollars to then secure an office for which they do not qualify all the time knowing they will need to violate the law to then qualify themselves making a crime not a crime suddenly? Can you read that clause to me? I don't think it will ever get that far as I plan upon forcing them to produce the original documents stored in the National Archives upon a motion of discovery. I highly doubt they will volunteer to be so badly embarrassed but as this is US government not law at work you never know, do you? Maybe they will show up and maybe I will be able to ask them to read the Constitution outloud - to The People - so we know as absolute fact, we have the proof, they know of the Constitution's existence and have the human ability to read it but violated it regardless.

My reason for being able to enforce the default is the paper is the property as are the people; as the paper is being withheld from us criminally so we can't defend the nation let alone oursleves. I said, 'As I made the commission a part of my defense and this nation's defense in two states and within federal court then you must adjudicate it according to Marbury for the withholding of the actual paper commission is now the injury itself and is now the violation of the fundamental right itself. Can and may The People defend the constitution if it is being amended illegally and withheld from them unlawfully? I took physical possession of those documents when I took possession of the legal power and moral authority of the office of the Executive and SCOTUS clerks and maybe some Justices are deliberately keeping those documents from me as we both know what you won't find within them: SCOTUS and its system of British writs and Blackstone's form. The reason SCOTUS is so desperate to keep those documents from me as is Obama is that as long as you preserve what is British you forever keep power form the People as the People would not know what is British but only what they actually live out as real: AMERICA. All involved know that once I get my hands on those original documents then the playing field is leveled forever as The People then have the homecourt advantage. The only reason they all failed to respond is they don't have a response. This is not my theory as it's physics: If you have no basis in our constitution then obviously you have no answer which then reasons away your actions as constitutional. In case this court doesn't get it: to even have an answer first you have to be located somewhere within those documents. You then have a major legal problem on your hands if you're not so much as implied within those documents and Susan Herbert has the genius idea to ask you to produce them upon direct appeal to the sitting but not constitutional Chief Justice when the US officially defaults on the 1871 version of the Constitution.' Sitting officers default on the 1871 version as well as the original so then SCOTUS rule is law??? Or better yet, it's only 'law' as nobody but lawyers and bankers of British derivation can get inside SCOTUS??? Who is in charge of this circus, actual puppets??? Who ever intended this form of government, Arron Burr maybe? Okay, he's an original Founder but Burr defaulted and then even acted against the Constitution; he actually tried ot levy actual war against Jefferson thus the US. Guess who The People then hung in effigy? John Marshall the presiding judge at Burr's trial. Proof: The People can govern thmselves and do know what's best for them. I closed with: 'Enforcement of the Constitution? The right is mine as default is. The People earned their day in court denied them in BVG as did I – we vested it - and The People made me their representative as not one person objected, not even Barack Obama or John Roberts.'

So, it's going to be difficult to do this but it's possible: start faxing and writing the court and demanding your day; demand you get an appearance in person via me. Let the court know that you know and that you know your rights are violated wholly especially if SCOTUS is refusing to adjudicate one clause but that it affects the actual citizens born here only thus SCOTUS' action is totally devoid of any reason. Let them know you're still furious over BVG and that if SCOTUS had filed my paper documents on 11/20/08 then you never would have acted as you did, that now that you know the real actual reasons for things like BVG and Obama that you're even angrier. Tell them that you know the lawyers responsible for BVG knew that you would never be allowed to defend yourself in SCOTUS; that they counted upon you never getting the appearance in person so now you're demanding what you were denied as that has become the injury. If articulate and able people fax and write to the court I believe this court might listen to reason as they did once before.

I filed the judgments separately to then keep the military away from Obama and on our side and to disseminate the info as in case you have not noticed NO COURT WOULD EVER FILE THIS CASE AS SUSAN V OBAMA NO MATTER WHAT I WROTE! I always knew the court dockets were being tampered with to keep people from knowing about the case as only my case is good and only my case actually unseats every candidate thus invalidates the election across the board. Here you go: If Marbury is what do you know and when do you know it, when is the first time SCOTUS knew about the election of 2008 and its illegality and even had exact names? February of 2007. It had the natural birth question as early as July or August of 2007. Is it a crime if SCOTUS knows and then does it to you anyway? Yes, so nobody would file the case as Susan V Obama as the implication was too scary. This court obeyed my order and filed the judgments separately.

What you want to do is use this court to do two things: you need to make the military aware that the case is made; they never had to obey Obama and as a civilian is standing they are then violating US law by backing Obama. You can place the biggest misogynist in all the world in checkmate by leveraging the military's reputation against personal beliefs; the US military always backs the law over personal beliefs. I have zero evidence the military is aware I even exist as for that to happen Mullen himself would have to be served and I do not believe he was. So you use the court to publicize the fact to the military that a civilian rose and made the case and the proof is direct action took place and then all defaulted; as it is math and exact words there is no debate! What theory? This is exactly worded law and exactly worded US case law plus math. Then use this court to make as many people, civilian voters, as possible aware as the people have little or no idea what this case is about. They do not understand that I targeted SCOTUS as it is to blame and as that's how you remove anything foreign to our law and our original Founder's intentions as this only happened as people gave their power and authority away...to restore sovereignty to The People you have to go after the thing that took it from them and that is an idea, that hierarchies exist in US law when they do not. We're equal not higher or lower! So who told you that SCOTUS knows more about you or US law then you do? Why do you truly believe everything SCOTUS writes down on paper even if it makes no sense whatsoever???

It's a language problem as we use language to create artificial barriers - they aren't reality - only to make it easier to understand and comprehend. We say it over and over so you come to believe those barriers are reality. It's not higher and lower court; that's British. You're a justice of the peace on the way in and a justice on the way out as in America we're all equal. The only official capacity anybody ever truly has is VOTER as everything else is conditional on good behavior but your vote? You can be Hitler incarnate and still vote. If you fight a Revolution over the vote as you can't remove a king unless you have a vote then your vote is dependent upon one thing only: BIRTH. If you're born here your vote is something else: an Executive Order. You can always pull rank over someone not born here or over someone who signs something like Res. 511. If you’d like to follow my example and issue an Executive Order yourself ordering the court to accord you, one of The People, your appearance in person as you’ll be needing the practice soon now is your opportunity:

The judge's name is Benett. It's case S:2009CV04094. Be very clear if you do issue an Executive Order: We're not here to adjudicate anything as what's done is done and the Constitution is so the only remedy and relief is to tell the truth of it in all of its ugly glory in open court as you can't be made to be a victim once people know.

Just in case I have three other irons in the fire including a rehearing in SCOTUS (lol!) but the only real difference is people knowing.

Susan

P.S. I know you guys think I'm nuts when I say We're going to DC! and then I'm denied. Trust me, We're going to DC! as that’s the only way this can end, either we go to DC or DC brings the governing documents to us. I predict, as it is science so the events now transpiring currently point to this outcome: In your lifetime you might witness a mountain come to Mohammed.

P.P.S. How do you know who's natural born and who's not? How do you know who's American and who's not? Only a foreigner, even if he is born here, would repeat the lie that US law is based upon the Magna Carta as then it entrenches British common law as rule of the day; it inserts and entrenches what is British and benefits only lawyers and bankers. You hear it so much from the time you are little you repeat it automatically when it is not the truth. You come to automatically accept it as the truth. A natural born American knows as absolute fact and law the Magna Carta is only an indirect relative to our Constitution and that the Confederacy is our direct relative and direct model. No natural born constitutional law professor would ever repeat the lie that we are modeled after the Magna Carta as it perpetuates injustice. Obviously the English didn't get it perfectly, did they? Trace the Constitution back in time; you do not end up at the Magna Carta and you find those same seminal ideas in other works. Sometimes I believe man had one original idea – Eve thought to eat that apple. We’ve been acting out the same drama ad infinitum ever since only as outside conditions change we then tell ourselves our story is new and improved. Ours actually is, in a way. We got it perfect, right out of the gate. Then Jefferson couldn’t convince any of you, not even James Madison, lol. Jefferson complained about Madison not getting this one thing on his deathbed: constitutional authority vested in the lone voter.

Any natural born constitutional law professor as all law in the US is constitutional knows that we borrowed something unique from the Iroquois: the design as it is actually indissoluble. If you ever hear a lawyer repeating the Magna Carta lie run as they aren't reasoning their argument but only parroting what a professor, textbook or teleprompter told them to parrot. All I have to do is get Obama in a courtroom to stand him down but when it comes to proof? If you need it I can prove him to be unconstitutional and unqualified all kinds of ways but one in particular is very funny: Talk to me about the Constitution. Just talk to the court about it; say whatever you think and feel. Better yet, talk about your own constitution - you. What's he gonna do, pick up my own brief and read it verbatim as if he wrote it??? The only place in the world you find some of that knowledge is within that brief. This is why we do not accept answers under actual duress as when you aren't under duress if you lie like a rug what will you do under actual duress on a witness stand in federal court? Can you believe he is producing a single word of truth if that's the case? Or do you have very reasonable doubts as to the veracity of anything he's saying as in he did not think it up himself? To be able to enter an answer you can believe in, lol, Obama had to act to answer BEFORE I wrote a brief. First authority to the bar does win in an authority case as if you have it you then bring it. The actual authority will race you to the bar as the first one to enter it then owns it. It's kind of hard to prove you have the ability to preserve, protect and defend what you do not even have as a concept in your head, get it? I mean, he either knows he’s not the exception to the law and that natural born is a qualification or he doesn't but either way? I doubt American Indians will want to accord foreigners something SCOTUS has denied them: Designation as persons under US law!

Indians who are born here and raised here do not qualify as persons in some situations for the violation of civil rights; they don't have them so they can't be violated as they aren't subject to US law. Because of dual citizenship they were denied a declaration that they are persons by SCOTUS so they are born here and they vote but guess what? If they aren't a person then foreigners would be able to assume the office of the executive while American Indians would not! It's why they keep denying women are persons by merely refusing to hear the case for women - to strip you of legal power thus strip you of control of your own life they have to deny you're a person so American Indians are screwing themselves by supporting Obama but do not know it. If you know any American Indians you might want to warn them: If he wanted to do so Barack Obama lacked the human ability to protect any American Indian as Barack Obama truly believes the Magna Carta lie and as he has no idea why American Indians aren't legal people: They haven't born born yet in a court of law. For some reason Obama believes he is not the same as American Indians or women. He's better than we are. And once I told him why? He still acted as if he had more rights than an Indian who was born here and who never violated the law and he objected to the only actual solution: Land patents.

Land patent owners elect the President so to remedy the injury to Indians you bust up the reservation system which is falling apart and only serves to incapacitate Indians as it keeps them powerless by forcing them to exist between two worlds, so they do not have control over either, and you replace it with land patents as then Indians are full citizens by choice - upon their own will and liberty - and they meet the strictest standard to then elect a President thus finally have an actual say in their own destiny and fate. They then are naturally born, and upon their own will and liberty. A land patent is like a mini-reservation or mini-nation within a nation, lol. I don't own land so I declared my own body with a land patent, I turned myself into property, claimed it and then declared it, so if you cross me you're actually and legally trespassing on private property and believe me I have posted it. The government would have to enact federal imminent domain to take me down and that's too bad for the fed as I, the person who is the property and who is also the property owner, happen to be zip code exempt in all ways. The US postal service doesn't even have a designated zip code for "Susan Herbert" so the fed can't even mount an imminent domain argument against me, lol. An added benefit: In FL and TX if you trespass on me I can and may then shoot to kill you. There are lots of ways to protect yourself if the nation says you’re not a person with rights.

As Indians do own land then this protects them two ways but liberates them from dual allegiance as then like the rest of us the only allegiance they have is to themselves. And land patents are basically indestructible in federal court as you trace them via treaty and I have the mother of all treaties on the fedral record as I can scientifically trace it to the area that was Eden where people first came to reason and then legally trace it to this place as well thanks to the superb record keeping skills of the Vatican. You could never dissolve that then in federal court so it would be inviolate and in perpetuity as long as Indians knew it and defended it as such. They would have more power and authority than they do now and way more security than what the Reservation system accords them as it is subject to the fed. It gives them the most weight in Presidential elections making up for the disparity as our Founders named land owners and apparently we aren't ready to jettison that yet. Traditionally American Indians protected the vested interests and rights of all people as it is their design; all of their systems use a form of this design, leveraging and stacking the power of a vote to equalize it. They even resolved gender disparity this way; one cool system has the poorest 'caste' marrying the wealthiest 'caste' so then the wealthy have a vested interest in protecting the poor: they will have to marry them someday, lol. It's why we have what is an open ended system. Europeans had motivation to eradicate these systems and tell the Magna Carta lie - 'ordinary' people would know how to exercise actual power if they understood the underlying principles and the actual design. If you know how and why it works you can tear it down and build it up again anyway you wish; you aren't subject to the whim and will of others as you can always outsmart them at their own game if only you know. If I could tell Indians this kind of stuff - Obama has motivation to see to it that they are never recognized as people under US law or that they never secure actual sovereignty as then one of them could unseat him via invocation of birthright that trumps anything he or his ilk is - they wouldn't be acting for Obama. Traditionally it has been very difficult to get American Indians to agree to harm themselves. Traditionally they fight wars over this very idea as they do not surrender to what is unconstitutional. Traditionally their war cry is they'd rather be dead than be injured by their own hand - I live in the home of the Seminole, the Unconquered People, as the entire federal government with the US military couldn't defeat them - so I have no idea what Obama offered them that is so damn attractive other than that false apperance and that's it - they have no idea they were told a lie and that they are victimizing their own persons, that what the entire federal government and US military couldn't do to them in over 200 years the Democratic Party did in only a few months: They gave up their traditions, their true beliefs about constitutional authority.

SIOUX CITY was no accident; I deliberately went there.