Today is the day the sitting officers should receive notice they have been nullified thus abolished. There's no debate as it's on the SCOTUS docket in black and white: BUSH V GORE, IN RE SUSAN, SUSAN V OBAMA & ROBERTS: 11/05/08, 11/20/08 and 11/09/09. Dissolution already is. I picked up a book someone sent me and found this; some of you know this already but some of you don't. The  book is “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised”. It’s about money and numbers; it’s about perceived power versus actual power. It’s about the nature of the injury you suffer. I added some of my reasoning to demonstrate that the power never left you – you misplaced it by coming to truly believe and so act upon lies. While you turned French your sitting government turned Chinese. Thus all I did was collect the lies I was hearing and act to dissolve them one by one based upon my own experience of life as my unique experience led me to know the truth of The Constitution thus America (bold face type is my own):

166         THE REVOLUTION WILL NOT BE TELEVISED

THE ORATORICAL ABILITY OF A SIX‑YEAR‑OLD

    “No Democrat running for president had ever opted out of public campaign financing (when this was written, 2004). The reason for this is fairly obvious. The way our labyrinthine cam­paign finance laws have worked since 1976, a candidate can get match­ing funds if he raises a certain amount of money ‑ but then he is restricted from spending more than that amount in any given state. So while matching funds can double a poorly funded candidate's base, tak­ing the matching money means the candidate can't go over the cap. But Republicans have proven so adept at raising those $1,000 and $2,000 checks from the wealthiest Americans (who benefit most from high‑end tax cuts and pro‑business policies) they can raise two, three, four times the cap, while Democrats (relying on much smaller donations from it, middle‑class, working constituency) haven't been able to afford to forego the matching funds.

In the 2000 election, Al Gore raised more money than any Democrat in history, $49 million. But George W. Bush raised $125 million. Al Gore was the vice president of the United States, a brilliant, respected career pub­lic servant. And yet somehow a weak governor with five years of political experience and the oratorical ability of a six‑year‑old was able to raise two ­and‑a‑half times as much money? How was that possible?

      In 2000, almost half of Bush's money came from 59,279 donations of $1,000 (the maximum limit for donations in 2000), more than three times as many big donations as any candidate had ever received. As Charles Lewis, executive director for the nonpartisan Center for Public Integrity wrote, "A contribution check of $1000 isn't something the average Ameri­can can write; most often, those who open their checkbooks are lawyers, lobbyists, or the vested economic interests they represent who want some­thing in return from the government." In effect, sixty thousand rich white guys determined who would be president for the rest of us three hundred million people. And this is not an aberration. Each year, the richest one­ quarter of 1 percent of Americans make 80 percent of all individual political donations. And corporations, the Republicans' primary source of funding, outspend labor, the Democrats' chief supporters, 10 to 1.

      Given the disparity in their funding, it's surprising Gore did as well as he did, winning the popular vote and only losing the election because of Florida's nostalgic return to Jim Crow‑style electioneering 6 and the polit­ical intercession of five Supreme Court justices.

In the fall of 2003, inside the Dean campaign, we realized for the first time that we actually had a shot at winning the nomination, and we began turning our attention to the Bush money machine‑which had, if any­thing, become even more formidable than in 2000. The secret to Bush's fund raising, is bundling, finding those corporate donors who can hit up their employees and country club friends for $1,000 and $2,000 checks. The Bush team calls people who could bring in $100,000 Pioneers, Donors who bring in $200,000 in bundled checks are called Rangers. According to an investigative project by the Washington Post, between 1998 and May of 2003, Bush raised $296.3 million and "at least a third of the total‑many sources believe more than half‑was raised by 631 people."

The king of these billionaire bundlers, until his company collapsed, leaving investors and employees high and dry, was Kenneth Lay, head of Enron ("Kenny Boy," as Bush called him) who brought in almost $600,000 for his old friend. As Lewis writes in The Buying of the President 2004, the key component of the "Pioneer System" is its nearly obsessive focus on making sure bundlers get "credit" for their fund‑raising work.

Now why would they want to receive credit? Clearly, many donors wanted first‑in‑line access to and influence with the prospective new administration. What is unusual about the Pioneer system is the un­abashed directness of the transaction: You help us and we'll credit you and remember your loyalty and support later.

     So what do the Kenny Boy Lays of the world get for their money? According to the Washington Post's investigation, two of the five people named to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission had been recom­mended by Lay. In effect, for his $600,000 he got to choose 40 percent of the government agency that would regulate his industry and his corrupt company!

     Of the 246 fund‑raisers identified by the Post as Pioneers in the 2000 campaign, 104 - or slightly more than 40 percent ‑ ended up in a job or an appointment. A study by the Washington Post, partly using infor­mation compiled by Texans for Public Justice ‑ found that 23 Pioneers were named as ambassadors and three were named to the Cabinet: Donald L. Evans at the Commerce Department, Elaine L. Chao at Labor and Tom Ridge at Homeland Security. At least 37 Pioneers were named to post-election transition teams, which helped place political appointees into key regulatory positions affecting industry.

A more important reward than a job, perhaps, is access. For about one‑fifth of the 2000 Pioneers, this is their business ‑ they are lobby­ists whose livelihoods depend on the perception that they can get things done in the government. More than half the Pioneers are heads of companies ‑ chief executive officers, company founders or manag­ing partners‑whose bottom lines are directly affected by a variety of government regulatory and tax decisions.

      This fire sale on access and appointments goes all the way to the top. During Dick Cheney's five years as CEO of Halliburton, the huge Texas ­based energy services company's employees more than doubled their dona­tions to the Republican Party (about $1.4 million, compared with just $64,000 donated to Democrats), and the amount of money they were awarded in U.S. government contracts took a corresponding leap, from $1.2 billion to $2.3 billion. And it's taken another leap since Cheney be­came vice president. When he sat down with industry insiders to rewrite the country's energy and environmental policies, it's a sure bet that Hal­liburton officials were at the table. And they weren't the only ones. The oil and gas industries contributed about $17 million to Bush and the Re­publican National Committee and were rewarded with, among other things, the right to drill in national parks. In dozens of cases, lobbyist who raised money for Bush were appointed to regulate the very indus­tries they had once lobbied for. Meantime, the Republicans' control of the House, Senate, and White House meant that corporations no longer worried about spreading the money around. Pharmaceutical companies, whose top five political donors gave more than $11 million to the Re­publicans and less than $2 million to the Democrats, were rewarded with a bill providing Medicare drug coverage for seniors, a bill that even its proponents acknowledge is far more beneficial for drug companies than for seniors.

      This was the rough political landscape we faced (and that John Kerry now faces) as we looked at squaring off against Bush. Clearly, our only hope was to raise enough money to compete, and that meant opting out of public financing. We would be turning down $19 million in matching funds, but it also meant we could go over the $45 million spending cap. There was serious debate about this. I argued that we had tapped into the political equivalent of a new Mother Lode with our Internet fund raising and that our only chance was continuing to reach out to people who bad been disengaged from politics, that getting people to donate money was, in effect, personally investing them in a candidate and in the system again. Surveys had shown that if all eligible voters had cast ballots in 2000, De­mocrats would have won not only the White House, but both houses of Congress, too. Yet low‑income people are 47 percent less likely to vote than high‑income people.' The key was getting those low‑income people to believe that their vote mattered again, so even if the checks were for ten or twenty bucks, in effect, raising money was our best hope of ener­gizing the electorate.” - Joe Trippi

Yes, TRICK those citizens by getting them to act upon a false perception, that BLACK is an intrinsic difference and BLACK translates into liberty and justice when it doesn’t as BLACK is an appearance only and is nothing more than an outside condition that does not by itself have any meaning if your father was never a slave – he was born and raised in Kenya - and neither was your mother – she’s white so she and her ancestors weren’t victims either unless you count patriarchy which you didn’t as you are a patriarch - so that every time you claim you are a victim of slavery thus you know slavery you are lying but people believe it as all they see is black and they never stop to consider that they are being manipulated by “one of their own”. Obama is no victim and never has been. He himself was raised in Indonesia and Hawaii where the majority of the population is not white so while I would be doubly affected based upon appearances and judgment Obama would not; his outside appearance is the majority not the minority in Hawaii and Indonesia.  

Exactly like Republicans the Democrats tricked actual victims into victimizing their own selves first and then others as if that’s justice. “If you can’t beat ‘em then join ‘em – become a criminal.” The Democrats even fired a warning shot: WE ARE GIVING UP PUBLIC FUNDING but most citizens never batted an eye.

This is partly why I set out to prove you need zero dollars to ascend to any of these offices as you, your own self, vest yourself via action. Vetting? As in by an outside authority? There’s no such thing; it’s unconstitutional as nobody is the judge of you and nobody is your boss. Only you know all of your facts as nobody lived your life but you. You act upon your knowledge of the Declaration, Constitution and US case law (including the actions of the Founders, people alive in or around 1776 and 1787 as they then are the US’ founding ‘prophets’) and so you ‘vet’ yourself – you vest your interest and right. You act to claim your commission as an officer – a voter who is equal to the Chief Justice and President.

Obama acted upon his expert knowledge of the Constitution – he knows exactly how to violate it in such a way it is nigh impossible for the average citizen to ever overcome. None of this was an accident; it was and is intentional. The only thing he or any of the people associated with both major parties vetted and vested is their duty and right to occupy a jail cell. They now have a vested interest in legislation concerning prisons so we might grant them that privilege. Then again we may not as we limit prisoner lawsuits and in MD the supermax prisoners lost a major lawsuit and so the state, The People, can and may feed supermax prisoners  “the brick” – a loaf of RECONSTITUTED protein. Thus the RECONSTITUTED brick is CONSTITUTIONAL not cruel and unusual.  What’s cruel and unusual is according actual terrorists protection of the Constitution while you have none. So I set out to prove this only happens if you allow it to happen, if you begin to believe the lies they are telling you so you actually begin to act as if you are powerless. The biggest lie I heard? Money equals power. That money is the cause and money was injuring you.

Money is a false perception. It’s meaningless. Legally? I, Susan, can print up currency and if you accept it then it is legal tender. As long as you know and you choose to accept it then you may, as it is a legal contract. I printed up a worthless piece of paper, a money order, then I turned it into one of the most valuable pieces of paper on Earth by writing TRIBUTE across it and then even warning the court clerk. The federal court accepted it thus confessing: It knows this is criminal but it is doing it regardless. The case law is once the receiver cashes it then that is proof of an agreement; the receiver is agreeing and so voluntarily entering the contract; he or it is accepting tribute. In an actual Republic would a court clerk or federal judge ever cash a check or money order that read “tribute”? No, they would return it and by doing so tell the issuer: “This IS your point of law; ask this federal question”. People act for reasoning; there’s always a reason, an actual reason or the truth, behind all human actions. If you act w/o a reason?  If you truly have no reason? You are actually insane. That's what insanity is. What’s the visible pattern that tells us the truth as to motive and intent aka reason?

The law does not apply to the Judiciary, the Judiciary is engaged in a struggle for power and control not constitutional authority. Why? How? The People have never held the Supreme Court accountable or responsible for its actions. The lie the citizens are told? “We can’t – it’s too expensive.” The truth? All it takes is a five or six page form and ten copies of it; at 10 cents a page that’s six bucks. Plus postage so another 5 bucks as Priority Mail envelopes are free. Our taxes pay for them as the ‘tax’ is the postage; it’s why when the fed shuts down due to the budget the post office remains open, as you buying stamps funds it, you directly fund it, so its independent of legislation concerning the budget. The other lie? “We can’t sue the Supreme Court.” The truth? Yes you can if you prove it as nobody is above the law so prove they are injuring you with full knowing. All you have to do is prove they are not acting under the authority of the US, The Constitution, and then you can and may name them as individuals. To do that directly engage them as CLERK is the link in the chain you target as a clerk will always stand between you and a Justice and DUE PROCESS does not mean a clerk reasons and decides the case, does it? Thus it will be very easy to suffer injury at the hands of a clerk – phone them. The People could do this for free IF they can find a way to make the federal government fund the Petition, the postage and copies. So to PROVE you can become President on zero dollars all you do is...

Sue to overturn BVG as then you take out all clerks and all Justices save one: Roberts. It will be you, whoever is sitting as President and Roberts in a court of law. It will be a constitutional showdown, a shootout. When its over Roberts might be standing but whoever is actually sitting as President will not be. No matter who it is as that person, whoever is sitting, can’t be a member of any “organized” party as that’s what racketeering is: Organized crime and so far no other actual independent exists as they all have legal representation.

The UNIVERSAL truth aka the law at work? The will of The People as manmade law arises from the will of the People and if you happen to live in America then the manmade law matches the law of nature so the will of The People is also the will of the universe, the will of God. If you’re willing and you’re constitutional then you are the will of God being realized in the physical world. Your victory is nature; it supposed to happen as it’s the law both US government and physics. No man on Earth can defeat The Creator so no man on Earth can defeat The Constitution. And if they make an attempt? They are unfit to serve. They are crooks not innocent dupes.

SCOTUS clerks announced to me NO NONLAWYERS and NO WOMEN. In other words NOT THE PEOPLE or: SCOTUS clerks announced they did not believe in The Constitution; they did not believe The Constitution protected The People or that The People had any power over them, SCOTUS. How can you work for SCOTUS if you are announcing loudly and plainly “I do not believe in The Constitution”??? A monopoly of the unethical that’s how. Racketeering, that’s how. I expected to hear lots of things when I phoned SCOTUS but not: “We, SCOTUS, do not believe in The Declaration or The Constitution.” SCOTUS made our job easy; it confessed the very first time we engaged it directly! If SCOTUS is truthful, if it tells you exactly what’s up, then you CAN defend yourself as you can act upon and agaisnt the truth: SCOTUS truly believes it is above the law thus is the boss of me; that all power and authority belong to it.

All of this was my line of reasoning albeit very simplified. It actually is very simple but as the truth is so amazing and painful people aren’t willing to accept how very easy and simple it is. They ask me about money, religion and taxes as if that stuff is the legal issue not their one person. Others demand complicated, convoluted reasoning by way of things like Blackstone’s or US Code. Code is not law; if it were law we’d call it law. And Blackstone’s is British, not American. So is the bar; it stands for British Accreditation Registry. The British institution you have to defeat is SCOTUS as then you defeat British law, British banking and British presidents. You defeat British ideas. The People themselves triumph over royal and/or or socialist thinking at long last. YOU have to change your very thinking about The Constitution and so actual power. I can achange all that outside garbage; what good is that if you don’t change your thinking so that you never again make the same mistakes? A person told me and I agree: Socialism is the default government of man; it’s what man resorts to as a last ditch effort, as the righteous thing to do is difficult. So man takes the easy way out never realizing he builds his own prison and he’s his own jailer. You’re in jail and the door is locked behind you before you ever realize you’re headed down that road. If I have to I’ll invite you to dinner at my house and fed you the brick to hammer my point home, lol:

The Constitutional President of Oz says: THE POWER HAS BEEN IN YOU SINCE MAN FIRST ACTED PRO SE, IN EDEN. YOU JUST DON’T KNOW IT AS YOU NEVER ACTUALLY EXERTED IT: OTHER PEOPLE DID IT FOR YOU! That’s not actual power; THAT’S NOT YOU EXERTING IT. IF YOU NEVER EXERT IT YOURSELF YOU NEVER EXPERIENCE ACTUAL LIBERATION.  WHAT’S THE WRITE IN SPACE FOR IF NOT TO LIBERATE YOURSELVES – TO DEFEAT PHONY PIONEERS AND SO REPLACE THEM WITH ACTUAL PIONEERS – YOU? YOU NEED TO RECONSTITUTE YOURSELF BY OWNING NEW KNOWLEDGE, OR, BY BECOMING AWARE OF THE TRUTH AS NO FEDERAL JUDGE AWARDS THE TRUTH TO YOU. NO PERSON HAS THE POWER TO GIVE YOU LIBERTY. IT’S INALIENABLE; IT’S NOT OF MAN BUT OF THE CREATOR SO YOU HAVE IT BUT HAVE NEVER HAD AN ACTUAL OPPORTUNITY TO EXERT IT. IT IS ALREADY SO ALL YOU GOTTA DO IS ACKNOWLEDGE IT!

It’s like the Sinner’s Prayer: The reason to acknowledge the SCOTUS docket, that the US defaulted on 11/05/08 and is still in default and then SCOTUS defaulted on 11/09/09 thus we won, isn’t about me but about you, as once you acknowledge you won you can no longer deny you have all of the power and they have nothing. The law, all of it, is on your side not theirs. You say the Sinner’s Prayer not because it automatically absolves you of all sin but because once you acknowledge the truth you can never use sorry excuses again. You then have to act upon the truth not the lies they tell you and/or that you tell yourself. Once you acknowledge "I'm equal in the eyes of God" and “love they brother as thyself” is the truth then you can’t violate it for if you do it is a sin as you know the truth but are acting against it regardless. Why do humans sin? For the same reason they violate The Constitution – selfish reasons. It’s everything except brotherly love. Once you acknowledge all power and authority is yours a sitting officer can’t harm you or anyone else for you’d have to harm yourself first for that to even be possible so you can no longer blame everything and everyone but yourself. You prevent the injury before it begins – when people first suggest it’s okay to violate the law this one time. You say NO and back it up with force – you enforce no - as you understand they mean to violate you this one time.  

I’m acting upon the truth of the Constitution while federal judges and most of you are not. I experienced liberty and then the ‘hidden’ national treasure, the previously unknown sacred experience within US law – before any of you. There’s something to be had beyond or in addition to liberation. Anybody can do what I did. Thus I, Susan, will always be the extraordinary and intervening circumstance. Guess what? Once you guys begin to realize this and discern what is or is not true, correct and fact thus actual law then you too become the extraordinary and intervening circumstance: you’re the opposing force the sitting criminals have to defeat. Are they ever gonna kill all of you?

As I despise guys like Joe Trippi, the guy who authored this self aggrandizing account of the Dean campaign as he knows but still engenders and condones it regardless, I asked the involved authorities to decide one question alone, to side with my ruling, thus act to award the commission to me so that YOU have to decide the 20 pages of federal questions I entered to SCOTUS. Power and authority never actually removed from the People is then VISIBLY ‘transferred’ back to The People via a VISIBLE symbol of the Founders intentions – paper that reads “In Congress on July 4^th, 1776” as your clue is:

ONLY PEOPLE CONGRESS!