Return to Main Menu
from bdobry
to Tim Thomas
date Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:56 AM
subject Silence is not always golden, lol

It does not matter who reads them at this point. I mean, once you serve the Joint Chiefs? It's inside the Department of Defense thus anybody who is so inclined will look up your whole life as well as sic criminally acting agents upon you. You let the cat out of the bag at that point. Their first clue ought to be I'm the lone American actually and legally still standing. What's broken inside of you if you set out to harm the only person who can and will defend The Constitution? What in the world ever made you wake up and then reason and decide other American citizens who do obey the law are your enemies? If that's you then you're the person who is the crook and so is the lethal threat. At some point one of us has to say, "If you're so inclined then here I am and you know it so take your best shot as I am not afraid of the likes of you even if the rest of the planet is". I'm not reckless; I'm cautious but not overly so. Fear is not knowing but I know - Ive been dead - and I did have the US Marshall and Secret Service here three times already so what's the big deal? All the things people name and all the things others use to scare you do not apply to me so while I should be cautious I'm not going to be afraid to tell anybody I made a phone call.

All fear is based upon what you do not know; what might happen but once you do know it? No fear. The reason you're not to be afraid of the government is ignorance is not a valid, legal excuse and informed consent is your right. You're supposed to know so not have to be afraid of the government. You're suposed to be in charge of them: "When people fear their government there is tyranny; when the government fears the people WHO KNOW there is liberty". [No matter how often I do this it still makes me laugh when it works out so perfectly. How can someone not love how perfectly all the pieces of this puzzle fit?]

Let's pretend a person discovers I am still acting and so they reason they need to stop me or else they will be going down. NEWSFLASH: The one and only opportunity they have to escape the death penalty is me as death is now so you can't escape it w/o me but you have a chance, it can and may happen, if I'm heard so why harm me? As long as I'm acting the worst criminals in this nation still have an opportunity to receive a just hearing. The truth is already down on paper and on the internet; as none of these people can actually control nature itself? Whatever I don't address nature will.

Flip it: what if an internet rumor begins? What if it goes viral? What if like a nucelar chain reaction other people begin to think, "Hey! I never thought of suing SCOTUS or picking up a phoene and calling the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs." People don't know you CAN do this stuff and they have no example so I'm it. Once I had the SCOTUS docket, one that can never ever be reconciled with my petition, The Constitution, Marbury, any US case law or the prior court action? It matches nothing but the federal criminal code? I can and will be a lot less cautious.

Tim, those who do know are yet insiting they can file court cases. No, not if a citizen did what has never been done before - exhausted the process proving there is zero justice. You CAN file a court case; it is now delusional and frivolous to truly believe you will secure justice when it does not exist unless I, Susan, create it. If you have all those resources why not act with me instead of for yourself? I am all for people making an attempt and previously I was all for people filing new cases but now? It is more of the same, repeating what will not work as what you have to first change or get around is the process and in this case? The Founders never created the process so it does not yet exist and if you can't first reason that? YOU CAN'T POSSIBLY FILE A COURT CASE IN WHICH YOU WILL CREATE WHAT YOU DO NOT KNOW DOES NOT EXIST! So you do something else no matter what it is as long as it's different. So now we can't be so silent anymore as we've been silent and the crooks count upon it.

As for gold and silver: I know as absolute fact a metallic standard is now unconstitutional as we know more science; we discovered more of how nature works. The concept humans have re what currency is and does is wrong; it's just wrong. What you know of as "money" is about to go the way of the dinosaur. This is an example of a new amendment that will work, as it retains the exact words gold & silver and is the Founders intent but it is not metallic. It's something every indidivdual controls himself thus no one person or group can then manipulate supply and demand thus artificially drive the ecomony and so control you against your will and w/o your knowledge for their own advantage. Besides, you can only mine so much metal before you are throwing the balance of Earth and man off; metal is an exhaustable resource; it's not "free" energy. Actual free energy all around is what we will soon realize. As gold & silver is now constitutionally set I can and may accept it...I can reason it. Ideally I'd give someone a master and say "Make ten copies and mail it to these addresses" but that's not very practical and others have to work a full time job in addition to all this other stuff. This is my full time job, lol.

I know it smight seem as if I am being a hardliner merely to posture as some sort of saint; it's not that at all. Trust me, if I had to steal to get somethign done? If I could reason it as legal I would as stealing may be self defense not stealing depending upon your facts. My biggest reasons for never accepting money are: 1, I set out to prove no American needs billions of dollars to secure any office at all and that money is controlling you, that you're not in control of your own life because you falsely believe money possesses an intrinsic value when it does not as it's wholly arbitary and 2, Something unexpected happened along the way: I never thought I'd ever have any help; it not once entered my head. I'm used to acting all alone as I have since birth. About age 5 not birth, lol. It was an absolute fact of me: I don't have it in me to sell out or quit so I will always be poor and laways be struggling. To do that is to give up on myself thus confess that I'm not human and not equal so I can't. People in my world were willing to kill me as I would not violate the term 'human'. It's about what I know to be true re me not other people. I believe it's true for others but they don't believe it themselves or that's true for anybody else which is why we are in this mess. I can't ever stop defending my self. But then in the last few months several people have come to me who do not believe a word I say but who did notice there's no "donate here" button or even any blurb about it while every other person pressing suit is asking for money. As millionaire lawyers like Taitz ask for it and as they do seem to have a personal agenda and as most people do not believe anything I say, they end up looking for my reason, my motive and intent, and can't find it. [I wrote it down in giant sized letters for them, lol]. I've had people contact me and say they will never believe anything I write BUT they can't reconcile my actions compared to everyone else's actions when they realize I'm not asking for money so they then think,"I don't believe Susan, she sounds crazy, but she doesn't want money so maybe she's right about something". Instead of issuing a blanket denial in their heads they stop and wonder, "Why her? Why isn't she asking for money?" And eventually they get to this point: W/o money I made it further than anybody else and when I have clerks acting against me. Money forces people to reconsider the status quo, the lie they told themsleves: I can't do this as it costs thousands of dollars to sue. So if I can w/o money and with people set against me why can't Taitz with money but w/o anyone set agaisnt her? The difference is money so then I can say: "You might want to go find out what money is and start connecting it to every facet of your life; if it has no value you then might want to ask yourself why it has driven every single decision you ever made...something that's not actual or real - the paper it's printed on is real but money itself is not - controls you as you have no idea NONE of this is actual or real; it's all made up garbage dressed up with legal and scientific sounding words so you truly believe it's real and act upno it but it isn't and so if I'm powerful w/o money, more powerful than SCOTUS even as I moved it, WHAT THE HELL AM I USING???"

When all else fails I've been able to use the idea of money to hook people as I myself had no idea that people actively look to see if you ask for money; they go there first, looking all over your site and your paper, lol! They are guilty and so they assume we are too so they immediately go there, lol. Money legal or not was never an option for me - profit wasn't an option - but I had no clue as to the perceived power of a "donate here" button. Or lack thereof.

So I may accept gold & silver as long it's not profit and until I address currency but if you believe the lie known as the "return to the bi-metallic standard" get rid of it. In the Founders day and age it did work; it was constitutional and practical. It was perfectly reasonable. But everything including people has changed as we know so much more...if the Founders could mine gold like we can, how long would the gold standard have lasted before it became exploited and unjust? And if nothing else, how do you ever justify wealthier citizens hording gold currently while poorer people can't so that if we ever did return to that standard we'd enter it as already unjust? If you start trying to equalize gold so it's just that's communism. You need to create a standard that we all enter into as just and equal but that is established in the Constitution so that it is up to the individual's will and liberty; it's on you. What about people who are incapacitated? Easy, as your standard must be one that then causes people to be motivated to volunteer to care for those who are vulnerable or defenseless w/o actually paying them to do it. Conditions are exactly perfect in the US for this kind of revolutionary currency to take root eventually leading to a day whereby we abandon all currency, those forms we know today will be gone. We'll still have the idea of currency, that you have something valuable that you can exchange with another person for something you need, but paper money, coins or clam shells in 100 or 150 years from now? I believe it will be completely gone. Our generation and our children will use some form of it but our grandkids and great grandkids won't. I'd bet you but we'll be dead by then and even if we discover a way to live to 250 what would we bet if by then currency is no more? Knowing me I'd bet you a trip to San Diego or something only to have CA fall off.

Susan.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
from Tim Thomas
to bdobry
date Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:32 PM
subject Re: Silence is not always golden, lol

Susan,
I love reading your email and wish I could see more the way you do. I know it's a blessing and a curse.lol As time goes on I am understanding more and more, maybe I could break down whatever barrier their is and call you and talk some time.
At far as the silver, how much would not be a profit? Maybe I could help myself by helping you if you'll let me.
I spent the weekend with a man I was able to understand a little more of what I believe you are talking about. His property was given to the church and he tends the land, living to help others and serve as God's workman.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
from bdobry
to Tim Thomas
date Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 1:47 PM
subject Re: Silence is not always golden, lol

Tim:

I know this response is late..I've been serving the people I have to serve with notice of default. I'll phone you. Set up a time. You know, I might be passing by you and Linda. It's why I told you guys to look at the four compass points and as the arrow flies you should see a fact of Susan, a place. I named it once but then took the name out so I have no idea if anybody knows this or not.

I'm going through neglected email now. Because I predicted all of this almost three years ago I knew to keep this one 'authority' in my pocket. I know others must crack up; I write WERE GOING TO DC PEOPLE! and then I get a denial and they think I'm nuts. LOL! If I know I needed a third case conference and then a denial to then PROVE to the DOJ clerks obstructed justice in such a way its criminal I know WERE GOING TO DC PEOPLE! once I'm filed that third time as then a case conference has to occur or the jig is up and hose clerks know it.

If Clayton Higgins kept my letters? You will fall out when you read them. Do you know the real, actual reason the 11th district clerks did not obey the order to unfile my documents?

The first time I contacted them to file anything I warned the clerk, Andrea: "I know as absolute fact at some pint a judge is going to ask you or order you to do something that involves going into the files in a criminal manner; i know the court rules and i know what this is about - power and control - so when that judge asks you to do it you are going to have to take a stand. you cannot be afraid to say NO to that judge. And knowing federal judges? They will never directly confront you but order you to do it as if that makes it legal. no, as the court rule is NO JUDGE MAY EVER TAMPER WITH THE FILES I.E. NO JUDGE MAY ASK A CLERK TO DO HIS DIRTY WORK FOR HIM. You know why Andréa? If you do it and the DOJ gets involved that judge is going to hang you out to dry as in you should have known better. So, you might have to risk everything, and it might hurt, but guess what? Like me it may turn out to be the best dam nothing that ever happened to you as it will be your means to stop any judge from ever trying to pull rank on you again, to abuse his power only to abuse you."

What happens months later? ANDREA: I ORDER YOU TO UNFILE THIS MOTION AND RETURN IT PLUS NEVER FILE ANYTHING THIS PERSON ENTERS FROM HERE ON OUT.

Hey Tim, I'll give that judge points for creativity as she not only ordered Andréa to tamper with evidence but to then start adjudicating cases, to decide motions and other filings her own self. That judge said: Do my job for me so I don't go to jail. LOL! The clerks knew to look out for this and they knew US case law as I fed them their legal argument, lol. I cited all the US case law and reasoning for them months before it ever happened.

I can't wait to sit down with you guys and show you and tell you all of the seemingly amazing things that happened, all of the events that transpired. The thing that kills me now? I could teach all of you guys how to do this as its so much easier than anyone ever knew. You know what? I've always known its about how we process language thus the truth but I happened to see an article in NEWSWEEK. Years ago I told the federal court that this has to do with English as English does something no other language does; while it's the best language to use to own this knowledge its a double edged sword because of what it does if you're not careful. you know, how I said if you 'lose' your language, if you do not know formal, standard English, you then lose awareness of the law? Well, English is a Germanic language and a living language unlike other dead languages. And most of it has Latin roots and we use Latin in the law as it is dead; everybody can know it and it never changes.

But guess what? What I thought science knew as a fact and law? SCIENCE SAID THIS IS NOT TRUE! SCIENCE SAID WE HAVE NO EVIDENCE! So I'm flipping through NEWSWEEK, July of 09 and there's an article: Apparently science is only now discovering what I have always known, lol. It's one page article titled "Word" something. The last paragraph? It's about how English places blame even for "accidents"; that English attributes causality to a person. LOL! Duh!!! In English a bowl doesn't fall off a counter; Sally or Jim had to knock it off a counter, even accidentally, as bowls do not have will! And blame is about guilt, shame and anger. And that's related to US government and law as we are a living government of people so the ideas people have as people act upno ideas cause everything and so it's related to victimization, to what domestic violence perpetrated by the Legislature and the Executive actually is. It's related to self-awareness. It's a cool little article; science missed 90% of the boat - even now inthis article - but look it up if you can. I found it today, in my doctors office. It's the issue with Sotomayor in it; I think Holder is on the cover but I'm not sure.

Anyway, let me finish going through my mail.

Susan.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
from Tim Thomas
to bdobry
date Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 6:06 PM
subject Re: Silence is not always golden, lol

Is the place your talking about have an Indian name?

Return to Main Menu