Return to Main Menu
from bdobry
date Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:25 PM
subject Meetup re SCOTUS/OBAMA

Hey, guys: I'm going to be at the library tomorrow. No topic is off limits but I posted this one below. When I say no topic is off limits I mean it. My expertise is in several different fields but I am now licensed to practice law in all 50 states plus the district as I entered the SCOTUS bar directly and forced direct action. "Certification" or "licensure" is what direct entry and direct action constitutes as you have defeated every lawyer, law school and all the employees of SCOTUS combined. It makes you the constitutional authority. Only William Marbury ever gained direct entry and action but he lost his award as you aren't the authority if you enter asking may I? or Can I? Marshall answered a lot of questions never asked as he had to justify his actions thus you need to read Marbury asking yourself, How or Where Marshall is getting his reasoning from; you need to ask What question is he asking and answering? What instructions is he giving us?LOL! SCOTUS clerks kept me out in person to avoid granting constitutional authority to the lone citizen - sovereignty - and to avoid the consequences of their criminal actions but I got my way in the end. It's not possible to lose an authority case as long as you never quit as there are only two possible endings: We die and stay dead or we win. Don't worry: My way gives all power to The People and not to the titles, papers and institutions. If you receive a denial and no person answered the petition and no reason is given? It's a default not a denial! In this type of case all Respondents must do so - respond - and if denied then an actual reason must be given (there isn't one, lol, so anything they do state is a lie and a crime which is why it must be heard in person, duh) and as the only ruling ever on this is Marbury thus you must be treated like Marbury the man or else it is a violation of a fundamental right. It is not anything else and nothing else is ever legal - ever as in never. If you want to overturn Marbury legally? Hear the case in person! This kind of tricky worldplay is a nasty lawyer trick they actually teach in law schools.

Some of you might be tempted to argue corruption has entered SCOTUS. My argument is that it was there from day one in 1790 and never left; that the only time we ever had actual due process and actual equal protection was when Marshall sat and that when he died it died with him. and that was only for white men. Nobody ever sued SCOTUS for a ruling that is wrong NOT in error as it defies inviolate law of this universe -math - and as it is an original case thus SCOTUS is the cause of Obama as in my unique case the US legally defaulted on 11/05/08 thus by not filing the paper they denied you the facts thus the protection of the law; you can't make an informed decision if the fact and law is kept from you criminally.

Anybody is welcome.

Announcing a new Meetup for JEFFERSON LIVES!

What: What Becomes An Institution Least? Repugnancy.

When: November 19, 2009 7:00 PM

Where:
Beaches Branch Library
600 3rd St
Neptune Beach, FL 32266
(904) 241-1141

When is a DENIAL not a DENIAL? When it can't be as it violates the law of nature and so the law of the US as both are one and the same when it is reasoned and applied correctly to men, women and children thus all humans.

As SCOTUS acted on 11/20/08 to stand down then you can never, ever reason it's 11/09/09 DENIAL to be anything but repugnant and void so it must be a default or a crime. Case law is action is the proof; you may not act and then take it back by [i]denying[/i] you ever did it especially if it is all over the SCOTUS docket! I heard the clerks with my own ears and I was threatened and what they exactly named then came to be...for a Justice to have actually issued this denial? A Justice would be claiming he or she is a king or worse God. I can and did then enter it to another court as with any default you enter it to an office of judgment. SCOTUS does not have such an office - another reason why it cannot be a DENIAL, as no SCOTUS rule covers such a ruling as: The very nature of a constitutional Republic and of SCOTUS makes this decision impossible; due to my legal standing it is a decision that finds me, the People and the military in abstentia for an act of SCOTUS, Bush V Gore and all of its effects including Obama, and overturns every single word of Marbury itself and when we are denied any and all protection of the law!

To be an actual and legal 'denial' means a citizen cannot address the violation of a fully vested fundamental right; it means no remedy and relief exists at all and if that's true? No justice exists for anyone. Marshall already ruled: you have to hear this type of case in person or else The Constitution is nothing but a worthless piece of paper. Would a Justice reason their own court out of existence? Not likely but a clerk would especially if he had motive and intent - he made a threat that is a crime, promising the entire office of clerks would help him sink the case and you your own self heard the clerks conspiring when documents were 'acted ' upon but never filed therefore there was no due process and the citizens had their right of informed consent denied them - so as only the clerks are a common denominator, as the only evidence you have is against them, as they do have motive and as the latest DENIAL goes against all US law, all US case law, all prior actions and all evidence and proof, you can[u] reasonably[/u] assume the clerks never showed the case to any Justice. Logically it can't be anything else as to have 9 Justices who are criminals now sitting is precluded by the odds and by other proof: Their own past rulings.

No SCOTUS clerk can ever claim innocence.

The only piece of paper proof that endemic corruption is and a coup is was the missing SCOTUS docket - you can't deny the docket - which I created for you as a citizen, nonlaywer victim had to appear pro se, as the authority. The Judiciary is always the last branch in any formerly just nation to fall and if your Judiciary goes then you have no actual opportunity. Physical death follows exactly like Rome. It might seem as if you have opportunity but you do not. Your rights are now violated wholly. It's only a matter of time. Learn from the Jews: do not wait to act. This would be WHY the Founders said you may not so much as violate one single citizens rights w/o redress and to harm one in such a way is to then harm all.

I will discuss how you still secure your rights if every single office holder and agent fails - even your fellow voters. I will tell you what you can expect in the future as this action has far reaching ramifications for all of us as at long last a citizen finally exhausted the process thus conclusively proved there is a special class of citizens: those who are allowed to abuse and exploit the law for ill gain and those who are being made to suffer with no available recourse via invocation of what is NOT US law. I will tell you to whom and what court I submitted this default judgment in order to secure your rights as well as my own.

Can you sue the sitting Chief Justice, Justices and clerks for the violation of fully vested interests and rights? Or for injury personal in nature or a crime? YES.

"No act of the legislature confers so extraordinary a privilege, nor can it derive countenance from the doctrines of the common law. After stating that personal injury from the king to a subject is presumed to be impossible, Blackstone, Vol. III. p. 255, says, 'but injuries to the rights of property can scarcely be committed by the crown without the intervention of its officers: for whom, the law, in matters of right, entertains no respect or delicacy; but furnishes various methods of detecting the errors and misconduct of those agents by whom the king has been deceived and induced to do a temporary injustice.'" - Marbury.

"Dear SCOTUS: MY PROPERTY INTEREST IS THE PEOPLE, THE MILITARY AND MY TWO BIOLOGICAL CHILDREN AS WELL AS MY OWN PERSON. I SUFFERED PHYSICAL INJURY, RECALL? THIS ESCALATED UNTIL YOU ASSAULTED AND BATTERED THE WRITTEN DOCUMENTS. THE PROPERTY INTEREST IS THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS AMENDED W/O DUE PROCESS AT LEAST THREE TIMES. SO FORGET THE PEOPLE; ARE YOU ABOUT TO TELL US THAT THE PHYSICAL PAPER DOCUMENTS THE TAXPAYERS OWN ARE NOT PROPERTY??? I’d think land, vegetation, minerals, water, air and animals are a given and:

“It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases must, of necessity, expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each. So if a law be in opposition to the Constitution; if both the law and the constitution apply to a particular case, so that the court must either decide that case conformably to the law, disregarding the Constitution; or conformably to the Constitution, disregarding the law; the court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case. This is of the very essence of judicial duty.” -Marbury

The Constitution conflicts with the law some of not all of the citizens made via a direct vote that violates every one of my fundamental rights such as due process, liberty, equal protection, freedom of speech, religion and press, natural birth and custody of my children. It made me the defendant in NY and I have already exhausted the NY Appellate twice over thus I remain the defendant and the commission is apart of my defense and the defense of this nation - The People - so the law the citizens made is now on the table as SCOTUS must adjudicate the issue or cease to exist as an institution. The Constitution provides no means to make law via the direct vote of The People be they innocent or guilty. SCOTUS may not personally like it but it is on me to bring the case into SCOTUS not on NY thus although SCOTUS unconstitutionally invokes its rule as law the word “plaintiff” is merely a word; in this case I am the petitioner/defendant mounting my defense inside SCOTUS as that is the nature of an authority suit of this type, different from Marbury as I did what Marshall instructed while William Marbury did not thus my defense will always be mounted in SCOTUS or in front of The People, either a common law court or via military action and any common law action must then be enforced by the military thus I, Susan, go straight to the military as I re-entered this court as the Commander. I am in no way the plaintiff as now even SCOTUS is acting criminally and so injuring me with full knowing thus like NY I am being found. I’m DEFENDING myself against every unjust institution and person including the clerks of this court and now I have been told you must use violence or you will never, ever secure the protection of the Declaration and Constitution – liberty and justice - as we, SCOTUS, will not accord it to you any other way except for violence aka a military action. NOTHING in US law provides for this as we are to have orderly transfers of power.

I'll simplify it for you: NONE of this is random; people too are not random. You’re a science so I can and do know how you will respond. I can design a plan and execute it accounting for you. If SCOTUS sets up what is impossible or criminal? There’s always a way around it as Blackstone’s tells you if you pay attention to what you, your own self, cite and invoke as law when it is not and it’s British not American to boot: If it is an actual right then it is inalienable so that SCOTUS may not deny it or take it from you thus if they try just find the thing in this universe that you can use as a force against the now criminal SCOTUS action; you’ll win as you’re using what is actual reality while they are using what suits them – what is fantasy - so they have no law and no natural force on their side but you do. From BLACKSTONES.

I reduced Blackstone's into a single concept, JUSTICES UNLIKE KINGS NOT ONLY ARE DUPED INTO DOING INJUSTICE BUT ISSUE CRIMINAL ORDERS THEIR AGENTS THEN ACT UPON MAKING THEM ALL CRIMINALS, or, after stating that personal injury from the king to a subject is presumed to be impossible the law, in matters of right...furnishes various methods of detecting the errors and misconduct of those agents by whom the king has been deceived and induced to do a temporary injustice, the ideas or parts of which appear in a linear, consecutive sequence in this new petition and in all of my documents so that you might understand. This court itself unjustly and insanely added "not possible if you sport the label Supreme Court" as if a king and all other people could do it but SCOTUS could not, as if only SCOTUS is ABSOLUTELY PERFECT and so beyond any and all human error. There's no such thing as if a SCOTUS employee does it then it is not a crime; even Nixon did not get away with that 'defense'. So SCOTUS do not be surprised if the next knock on your door is not the mailman with yet another petition falling on yoru deaf ears and your hardened, criminal heart but the proper authority, handing you your walking papers and placing handcuffs upon yoru wrists. As always I can't say exactly when only that WE WILL.

Susan, the acting, legal, constitutionally set President & Commander as the Founders, Marbury, my will, Obama and your action on 11/20/08 makes it so"

Return to Main Menu