Petition For Rehearing, As The Supreme Court Violated Marbury In My Unique Case Thus It Unreasoned Itself
Don’t actual religions unreason themselves with unconstitutional policies, rules and practices and via convoluted word games that make it seem as if and not logic or any actual reasoning? What else did you expect in 2007 and then 2008 w/o equal protection and due process for women and their children? Deny women liberty thus justice and you deny all the same -eventually. We are Rome and Greece but we can and may still avoid that fate as it is a matter of making a different decision. That’s it. Here we go as the clerks and/or the Justices do not ‘get’ that THEY ARE THE LEGAL ISSUE!!! :
This order of denial for an Extraordinary Writ of Prohibition and/or Mandamus now violates several federal precedents set by this very court. It strips me of any ability to prevent future injury from occurring, it forces me to suffer cruel and unusual punishment while I am innocent of any crime or am not guilty, it subjects me to injury as either law does not exist or it is not enforced and upheld in the name of women and in my name alone and if this is the case the law then is to be addressed, it makes legal or condones the discrimination of my absolute person alone, it grants constitutional authority of my person to men, it strips me of any and all legal power or my vote, it subjects me to greater future harm and it removes all checks and balances upon this court in the cases of women alone as all other branches of government have failed women and then my absolute person and as this court has begun denying hearing to cases of women who cite equal protection and due process violations and which have valid points of law.
The citizens have told me loudly and clearly: We will not uphold or enforce the law in the name of you nor any woman unless we get a decision from the Supreme Court stating that women are equal to men and so we then have to obey the law.
Intervening circumstances of a substantial and/or controlling effect are indeed present.
My life is at stake and even if it was not I cannot live it. The date of the latest injury? April 21st, 2008 the very day this petition was denied and the denial itself was cited as reason which serves to prove as fact a re-hearing in this court and the granting of a Writ of Prohibition is the only available remedy and relief. As soon as the third parties and involved authorities discovered that I was denied hearing they took action against me, which resulted in more injury and harm. A false police report was filed against me and incredulously, the state of FL finally pushed this case into the extreme: FL DCF acted upon a false complaint that I was abusing my children, with me for a court ordered visit. This false claim?
This claim was that as a person who believed in God, and as a person who has faith in the law of the US and so filed in the Supreme Court, I might then be mentally unstable and so harm to my children might occur in the future. Nothing in this claim was reason to investigate me. First, FL law does not recognize emotional abuse and so you may not connect anything emotional to possible future physical injury and secondly, as our law names a “creator” exactly, this speaks to my very first federal question: Is God actual reality and is Susan a person of God and created equivalent to any man, and if so, does Marbury V Madison then apply to her and to all other women?
FL, on the very day I was denied, acted to apply the law of this nation and of FL to my person in a manner not done to any other citizen, man or woman. FL exactly named as reason or cause the “Supreme Court”. This is where we are as a nation due to the current discrimination of women and of my person alone: A female citizen is now cited as being defective for expressing true belief or faith in a Creator or true belief or faith in our law, our Declaration and Constitution. FL’s actions serve to prove that I will yet be injured and victimized by the state, and that it will only get worse and worse as they have now cited God, officially cited God with that exact word “God” as reasoning to injure me, for being none other than: Susan Herbert.
Then on the 28th of April, the third parties, the Austin’s, entered a petition to Rensselaer County Family Court which is supported by: The exact petition that I entered and which was denied, the Supreme Court’s own notice of suit and the Supreme Court’s own docket. New York State and Rensselaer County then sent me a notice to appear. This claim falsely states that my case was “dismissed” when it was not and exactly states that as I made an attempt to secure justice for my persons and my children’s persons by exercising my rights and entering this court that the Petitioners now have reason to fear for the safety of my children thus, a de facto termination of parental rights should ensue via an order for modification that forces me to travel to NY in order to be with or near my children and that is an impossible standard for me.
The NY Petitioners supported this “fear” using the Justices themselves and the institution known as the Supreme Court via attachment of my federal petition; the exactly named the Supreme Court within their petition and that is it: These people and this state are now trying to punish me and make me suffer for doing exactly what the original American founders taught me to do: Help myself. Use the law. They are acting upon a mistaken belief that any woman who acts to help herself and thus defy male authority must then be punished, and they are inferring that for a woman to enter the Supreme Court all on her own and expect to be heard is somehow defective as in “mentally ill” or even “crazy”, all words they have tried to apply to my person before and were not able to do; in fact, it was one of the third parties, Charles Herbert, named in the NY petition who was cited as “unreasonable” by a forensic psychiatrist and so removed by the state of PA but NY placed him right back in it. He is the cause of all of this and he is at it again and NY State is allowing this like they allowed so many of my and my son’s rights to be violated.
This latest action? This is proof beyond any doubt that I must be granted a re-hearing. If the Petitioners and their counsel have now exactly cited this Court and the denial of a Writ of Prohibition as reasoning to violate the law and my rights, and if I am now suffering because of it, and this now has crossed state lines as it happened first in FL and then NY so it is interstate, then the only possible remedy and relief is a re-hearing.
Attached as Appendix A is the Renneselaer County, NY Family District Court petition, entered April 28th, 2008 and which based upon the historical events of April 21st, 2008 and that exactly names the “Supreme Court of the United States”. Attached as Appendix B is the actual police report regarding those same historical events and which proves as fact that the other cause named, myself, and the claim that I am not safe and so my children must be protected from me is a lie on their part as the police wrote this report in favor of myself, as these police officers respected my moral authority and the fact that I invoked the law of both FL and the US. This NY petition is set to be heard on June 4th, 2008.
This is an intervening circumstance of a substantive and/or controlling effect as these people and this state now seek to use this denial to sever my parental rights without ever legally doing so, and in a case which proves that I am treated like no other citizen in this nation and that it is only because I am a woman named Susan Herbert and that all women are yet denied their rights as citizens refuse to acknowledge the reality of the existence of the 19th amendment, these people and this state are now effectively telling me and all other women: If you act upon our governing documents or if you expose what we have done to you to an authority, we can and will injure and harm you; we can and will punish you and so stop you from ever entering a court of law again. They are saying they have permission from the Supreme Court of the United States.
If this court does not reverse its decision as I tried but cannot gain entry to an other federal court or any court due to my unique facts and due to things which I have zero control over, then I will be the first and only citizen born into liberty or the vote, who acted upon her will and her knowledge of the law and who invoked the living spirit of our founders, and in so doing made it all the way into the Supreme Court on her own volition and was then denied any and all remedy and relief so that she has been accorded zero protection of the law. Zero; she is no longer American or human but an animal, without liberty, and the law does not apply to her or any woman nor is she obligated under it.
This case goes directly to the heart of our Declaration and Constitution and is about the very construction of our law as it was originally written. It is about life and death. I can prove a creator, prove life and prove death as absolutes. See my reasoning attached as Appendix C as it is my true belief that my intelligence is an intervening circumstance of substantial and/or controlling effect as I come to own new knowledge each time I revisit this. This case will definitively overturn Roe V Wade as a constitutionally protected right and also overturn a part of Carhart as they exist in conflict with each other and with our originally worded documents. There is indeed a right of privacy in our law, as it is written, but there is in no way any right to make or force a woman only to suffer death against her will when she is innocent. Together, as these decisions harm mothers, they then serve to harm all Americans from the cradle to the grave. They change who we are as a nation and injure the world.
I am of the true belief that it was the award of the Office of President that this court did not personally like. It has nothing to do with that or George Bush Jr. as a person or if he committed a crime or if he is at fault; it has to do with: The Law of the US. That is it. Law is law. This court has now changed the conditions and the rules so many times in the case of women there is nothing left. All you can do is: Deny them.
This is in no way about undoing Bush V Gore or actually removing George Bush Jr. from office. It is about American legal theory, how we came into being and who we are as a nation as we have never had a solid or tangible national identity due to the discrimination of women. It is about proving our law is the only elegant law written by men, overturning three unjust decisions - Roe V Wade, Carhart and Austin V Herbert - as they force women and children only to die in defense of an institution, upholding the military or Office of Commander and giving the Iraqi’s reason to adopt our law as theirs.
I can do all of this merely by standing upon the case that was the cause of my injury: Austin V Herbert. This case prevented me from coming forward in 2000. It has served to almost physically end my life more than once. I have suffered injuries so severe that I needed surgeries. It forced me to lose all of my worldly possessions even my actual home. This case is the reason I could not act; the ability was unjustly stripped from me. I need to address this or I cannot live my life; injury will never, ever cease and my death as an American and as a person named Susan Herbert is imminent.
If this court does not now take action on my behalf and grant a re-hearing it is setting the most dangerous precedent of all: Women are not covered under our law and women may be punished if they attempt to secure their rights; that no authority has to act to obey the law on a woman’s behalf not even the Supreme Court and this can be done without any reasoning. It is saying that my death is not an emergency and that even that - physical death - is not enough proof for this court. My dead body will not serve as cause or reason for this court to act, as my mangled body was not enough nor was a violation of every single one of my rights. Nothing will ever, ever, ever be enough, which is an impossible standard.
I cannot rely on any other body of government for June 4th, 2008 is almost here already and then it may be too late for my children and me. They have refused to act over and over and over. They have refused for 88 years and their excuse is that they are waiting upon a ruling from this court. We may not survive this grievous injury and harm. This court must restore my ability to protect myself and to prevent future injury and harm from occurring. It must.
The document exactly reads “liberty” and the 19th amendment was passed, but in actual reality women do not have their right of liberty; it is not yet realized. Equal protection and due process is denied them, as this court has not ruled for them. If you deny any group equal protection and due process it is then impossible to have liberty; it is not your protected right. Equal protection and due process must come first and then liberty is made real.
The discrimination of all women and of me alone will only worsen after the November elections unless I am heard. Iraq cannot possibly form a just constitutional government unless we ourselves are first willing to accord our own female citizens this same thing. We must set the example.
It is discrimination of my person to think another citizen can make this case but that I cannot.
Americans do not need protection from the issues and to do that is not safe. To deny me is to say that you must protect me from me and all of us from the Declaration and Constitution when the fact is no person on Earth needs protection from American law. Our law is one in which participation is absolutely necessary and indeed, it was a lack of participation - the failure of others to act and to fulfill their duties under our law - which made my case come to be what it is.
It is not actual treason; at some point it will rise to actual treason, as our government and law will be overthrown as evidenced by the state of my own life. As a citizen, my personhood, born with the creation of this universe and then the signing of our Declaration, and set in motion and on fire with a gunshot, will be overthrown; I will be legally designated an animal and not a human as will all women by this denial.
I will be wholly and absolutely for the Declaration and Constitution but it will not be for me.
Conclusion:
This is demonstrably a first impression case dealing with the very construction of our governing documents themselves and of the construction of creation itself, and of the inviolate fact that women must be accorded full rights and that my own must be restored as we give actual birth to the federal property which counts for everything: Living people. If this does not happen we will cease to exist as a nation at some future point.
FL acted to investigate me for child abuse citing this very petition, this very denial and the facts that I had faith in God, faith in US law, faith in the Supreme Court and that I had filed in the Supreme Court. This occurred on the day I was denied hearing and was because of that denial. Rensselaer County, NY is currently undertaking action and has named me as the defendant in a petition, a petition seeking to terminate my parental rights in a de facto manner by not allowing for any visitation except in NY, an impossible standard for me to meet. This is emotional abuse but yet this state denies its existence and ignores its own written code naming emotional abuse. It is ignoring that my children were kidnapped in 1998 and that all court action in the last ten years, an entire decade, was and is in violation of our law. It is denying an actual, true emergency as life and death is at stake. It seeks to injure and harm me by continuing the injury my children and I suffer into their adult lives and beyond. It will serve to work a corruption of blood if this court does not intervene.
This NY petition is based solely upon me attempting to exercise my rights by filing in the Supreme Court of the US. This NY petition is supported by nothing more than my exact filing, the notice of suit, this court’s own docket and it states that a falsehood, a lie: That this court dismissed my case. It manipulates the English language as if to make it seem that a woman named Susan Herbert who attempts to secure her rights the only way in which she can at this point - by entering this court - is a criminal who broke the law and is unsafe or otherwise defective. Incredulously, it uses the Supreme Court itself to “prove” that I am these things and in so doing the NY petition itself violates US law: Art. 4 Sec. 4, the 14th and 19th amendments and the 1st amendment, the amendment that may be the reasoning we have survived and flourished so well in such a short time on Earth.
It insinuates that possessing a true belief in a Creator, a true belief in The Supreme Court of the United States and/or a true belief in the law of the US is not normal, is unsafe and is proof that I might abuse my children or that I might be mentally unstable and so, my sons need NY to protect them from me, from this Supreme Court and from the law of the US. It defames, libels and slanders the only persons who have ever taken accountability and responsibility for any injury their actions caused to me and my sons: The clerks of the Supreme Court of the United States.
The Supreme Court must not let NY do this to me or to any other woman or child. Now, the Supreme Court must not only act for my person but for its own self.
This case involves the fundamental right of female citizens to empower their persons via the law and access to our courts, a first amendment right, so that they can and may triumph over any adversity or injury, and any manner of injustice they might be subjected to no matter how large, improbable or seemingly insurmountable it may be, as it is my one vote, a vote I was born into as right, that empowers me and as a woman comes into this world with everything she is ever going to need in life already: Her person - her heart and her mind. This right exists in the Declaration first and then is exactly stated in our Constitution and Bill of Rights. The 19th amendment was never needed and neither was the 14th but they exist. They exist and like Brown the citizens and now the authorities once again want and need a ruling from this court before they live them out as real. This court must empower my self and all women to will an equitable government and equitable law into being.
While my approach in reasoning our law may be unique it is not unknown as our founders themselves reasoned that nature or that Creator endowed them with the right of liberty. It is not for man to legislate this right as being, as it exists independently of man; it came into existence with this universe. Liberty is what I seek to exercise as a woman and liberty is realized as law; denying me would be setting an impossible standard for me or for any other person to overcome as NY has now officially named God and the Supreme Court as reasoning to injure a mother and children so the death of my person and our law is imminent as it then makes creation of law or the enforcement of law impossible as I was harmed because I was born in America and because I filed in this court; it makes filing in the Supreme Court of the United States a de facto crime for which one - a woman only or my person only - can then be punished by the state. Remedy and relief is now only available in this court. And, it is imperative as this court cannot possibly know the exact details of God and so, cannot know how long I have to live; how long it will be before my actual, physical death occurs.
The Executive and the Congress cannot possibly create law or apply the law justly if they never come to hear my unique intellectual property: All of my reasoning; my whole case. I have no other effective means of doing this as all have failed me, some more than three times. This is not an exaggeration; it is fact and one can find this same thing all over the historical record of Earth.
We are exactly mimicking the fall of Rome and as our founders taught us, we do not need to make this mistake. All we need to do is what Americans do best: The thing no other nation has the courage or the willingness to do as America always and forever volunteers to do that - what has never been done before and which seems as if it is impossible. America and Americans make miracles happen with deliberation; they will miracles into being with full knowing. The odds against America do not frighten her as she is a God loving nation and so fear is unconstitutional.
If this court considers no federal question other than “Is God actual reality and if so, is Susan a human being created equivalent to any man and does Marbury V Madison then apply to her and to all other women?” a re-hearing and Writ of Prohibition must be granted due to FL and Rensselaer County, NY’s newest actions. There exists no other remedy and relief; no other legal resolution is possible or is available as our Creator and this very court itself are exactly named.
Our law is that we are all volunteers. I, my own self, volunteered to place myself before this court in spite of the ridicule I suffered and no matter how hard it forced me to work and no matter what I had to sacrifice. I am well aware of how my petition reads and what it is at first deemed to be: A joke, as men do not personally believe that a woman, acting on her own, could make a case that they and all other Americans have failed to yet make. They cannot get past a personal mistaken belief - personal unwritten unjust policy - which says that a woman cannot possibly be an actual genius as even my intelligence has been cited more than once and cannot possibly empower her own self to a place beyond the invisible limits they have set for her as my willingness and my successful attempt to file have now been cited. They have changed the question and the condition until the only thing left is to effectively state via the NY petition She is still alive; we want and need to kill her and kill the idea of her in her children.
The third parties, the authorities and the citizens deny the reality that will is the distinct power of a woman and that no man can or will ever come to give birth to actual living government and law, people, but only to the institutions of government and law while women give birth to it all. The core legal principle of my petition must be considered:
Our founders named a “Creator” and stated, with exact words, that “men” are “endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights” and that “among these rights are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”. I, as a lone, absolute woman, who also represents the whole class, am here to claim liberty as the inalienable right of a female citizen.
I, Susan, am an act of God.
I stake this claim first in my own name as the exact, absolute person SUSAN HERBERT, then in the names of my sons, ETHAN and CHRISTOPHER, and then in the name of all women and their children:
FUTURE AMERICANS.
I pray the court grants this petition.
Susan Herbert
Don’t actual religions unreason themselves with unconstitutional policies, rules and practices and via convoluted word games that make it seem as if and not logic or any actual reasoning? What else did you expect in 2007 and then 2008 w/o equal protection and due process for women and their children? Deny women liberty thus justice and you deny all the same -eventually. We are Rome and Greece but we can and may still avoid that fate as it is a matter of making a different decision. That’s it. Here we go as the clerks and/or the Justices do not ‘get’ that THEY ARE THE LEGAL ISSUE!!! :
This order of denial for an Extraordinary Writ of Prohibition and/or Mandamus now violates several federal precedents set by this very court. It strips me of any ability to prevent future injury from occurring, it forces me to suffer cruel and unusual punishment while I am innocent of any crime or am not guilty, it subjects me to injury as either law does not exist or it is not enforced and upheld in the name of women and in my name alone and if this is the case the law then is to be addressed, it makes legal or condones the discrimination of my absolute person alone, it grants constitutional authority of my person to men, it strips me of any and all legal power or my vote, it subjects me to greater future harm and it removes all checks and balances upon this court in the cases of women alone as all other branches of government have failed women and then my absolute person and as this court has begun denying hearing to cases of women who cite equal protection and due process violations and which have valid points of law.
The citizens have told me loudly and clearly: We will not uphold or enforce the law in the name of you nor any woman unless we get a decision from the Supreme Court stating that women are equal to men and so we then have to obey the law.
Intervening circumstances of a substantial and/or controlling effect are indeed present.
My life is at stake and even if it was not I cannot live it. The date of the latest injury? April 21st, 2008 the very day this petition was denied and the denial itself was cited as reason which serves to prove as fact a re-hearing in this court and the granting of a Writ of Prohibition is the only available remedy and relief. As soon as the third parties and involved authorities discovered that I was denied hearing they took action against me, which resulted in more injury and harm. A false police report was filed against me and incredulously, the state of FL finally pushed this case into the extreme: FL DCF acted upon a false complaint that I was abusing my children, with me for a court ordered visit. This false claim?
This claim was that as a person who believed in God, and as a person who has faith in the law of the US and so filed in the Supreme Court, I might then be mentally unstable and so harm to my children might occur in the future. Nothing in this claim was reason to investigate me. First, FL law does not recognize emotional abuse and so you may not connect anything emotional to possible future physical injury and secondly, as our law names a “creator” exactly, this speaks to my very first federal question: Is God actual reality and is Susan a person of God and created equivalent to any man, and if so, does Marbury V Madison then apply to her and to all other women?
FL, on the very day I was denied, acted to apply the law of this nation and of FL to my person in a manner not done to any other citizen, man or woman. FL exactly named as reason or cause the “Supreme Court”. This is where we are as a nation due to the current discrimination of women and of my person alone: A female citizen is now cited as being defective for expressing true belief or faith in a Creator or true belief or faith in our law, our Declaration and Constitution. FL’s actions serve to prove that I will yet be injured and victimized by the state, and that it will only get worse and worse as they have now cited God, officially cited God with that exact word “God” as reasoning to injure me, for being none other than: Susan Herbert.
Then on the 28th of April, the third parties, the Austin’s, entered a petition to Rensselaer County Family Court which is supported by: The exact petition that I entered and which was denied, the Supreme Court’s own notice of suit and the Supreme Court’s own docket. New York State and Rensselaer County then sent me a notice to appear. This claim falsely states that my case was “dismissed” when it was not and exactly states that as I made an attempt to secure justice for my persons and my children’s persons by exercising my rights and entering this court that the Petitioners now have reason to fear for the safety of my children thus, a de facto termination of parental rights should ensue via an order for modification that forces me to travel to NY in order to be with or near my children and that is an impossible standard for me.
The NY Petitioners supported this “fear” using the Justices themselves and the institution known as the Supreme Court via attachment of my federal petition; the exactly named the Supreme Court within their petition and that is it: These people and this state are now trying to punish me and make me suffer for doing exactly what the original American founders taught me to do: Help myself. Use the law. They are acting upon a mistaken belief that any woman who acts to help herself and thus defy male authority must then be punished, and they are inferring that for a woman to enter the Supreme Court all on her own and expect to be heard is somehow defective as in “mentally ill” or even “crazy”, all words they have tried to apply to my person before and were not able to do; in fact, it was one of the third parties, Charles Herbert, named in the NY petition who was cited as “unreasonable” by a forensic psychiatrist and so removed by the state of PA but NY placed him right back in it. He is the cause of all of this and he is at it again and NY State is allowing this like they allowed so many of my and my son’s rights to be violated.
This latest action? This is proof beyond any doubt that I must be granted a re-hearing. If the Petitioners and their counsel have now exactly cited this Court and the denial of a Writ of Prohibition as reasoning to violate the law and my rights, and if I am now suffering because of it, and this now has crossed state lines as it happened first in FL and then NY so it is interstate, then the only possible remedy and relief is a re-hearing.
Attached as Appendix A is the Renneselaer County, NY Family District Court petition, entered April 28th, 2008 and which based upon the historical events of April 21st, 2008 and that exactly names the “Supreme Court of the United States”. Attached as Appendix B is the actual police report regarding those same historical events and which proves as fact that the other cause named, myself, and the claim that I am not safe and so my children must be protected from me is a lie on their part as the police wrote this report in favor of myself, as these police officers respected my moral authority and the fact that I invoked the law of both FL and the US. This NY petition is set to be heard on June 4th, 2008.
This is an intervening circumstance of a substantive and/or controlling effect as these people and this state now seek to use this denial to sever my parental rights without ever legally doing so, and in a case which proves that I am treated like no other citizen in this nation and that it is only because I am a woman named Susan Herbert and that all women are yet denied their rights as citizens refuse to acknowledge the reality of the existence of the 19th amendment, these people and this state are now effectively telling me and all other women: If you act upon our governing documents or if you expose what we have done to you to an authority, we can and will injure and harm you; we can and will punish you and so stop you from ever entering a court of law again. They are saying they have permission from the Supreme Court of the United States.
If this court does not reverse its decision as I tried but cannot gain entry to an other federal court or any court due to my unique facts and due to things which I have zero control over, then I will be the first and only citizen born into liberty or the vote, who acted upon her will and her knowledge of the law and who invoked the living spirit of our founders, and in so doing made it all the way into the Supreme Court on her own volition and was then denied any and all remedy and relief so that she has been accorded zero protection of the law. Zero; she is no longer American or human but an animal, without liberty, and the law does not apply to her or any woman nor is she obligated under it.
This case goes directly to the heart of our Declaration and Constitution and is about the very construction of our law as it was originally written. It is about life and death. I can prove a creator, prove life and prove death as absolutes. See my reasoning attached as Appendix C as it is my true belief that my intelligence is an intervening circumstance of substantial and/or controlling effect as I come to own new knowledge each time I revisit this. This case will definitively overturn Roe V Wade as a constitutionally protected right and also overturn a part of Carhart as they exist in conflict with each other and with our originally worded documents. There is indeed a right of privacy in our law, as it is written, but there is in no way any right to make or force a woman only to suffer death against her will when she is innocent. Together, as these decisions harm mothers, they then serve to harm all Americans from the cradle to the grave. They change who we are as a nation and injure the world.
I am of the true belief that it was the award of the Office of President that this court did not personally like. It has nothing to do with that or George Bush Jr. as a person or if he committed a crime or if he is at fault; it has to do with: The Law of the US. That is it. Law is law. This court has now changed the conditions and the rules so many times in the case of women there is nothing left. All you can do is: Deny them.
This is in no way about undoing Bush V Gore or actually removing George Bush Jr. from office. It is about American legal theory, how we came into being and who we are as a nation as we have never had a solid or tangible national identity due to the discrimination of women. It is about proving our law is the only elegant law written by men, overturning three unjust decisions - Roe V Wade, Carhart and Austin V Herbert - as they force women and children only to die in defense of an institution, upholding the military or Office of Commander and giving the Iraqi’s reason to adopt our law as theirs.
I can do all of this merely by standing upon the case that was the cause of my injury: Austin V Herbert. This case prevented me from coming forward in 2000. It has served to almost physically end my life more than once. I have suffered injuries so severe that I needed surgeries. It forced me to lose all of my worldly possessions even my actual home. This case is the reason I could not act; the ability was unjustly stripped from me. I need to address this or I cannot live my life; injury will never, ever cease and my death as an American and as a person named Susan Herbert is imminent.
If this court does not now take action on my behalf and grant a re-hearing it is setting the most dangerous precedent of all: Women are not covered under our law and women may be punished if they attempt to secure their rights; that no authority has to act to obey the law on a woman’s behalf not even the Supreme Court and this can be done without any reasoning. It is saying that my death is not an emergency and that even that - physical death - is not enough proof for this court. My dead body will not serve as cause or reason for this court to act, as my mangled body was not enough nor was a violation of every single one of my rights. Nothing will ever, ever, ever be enough, which is an impossible standard.
I cannot rely on any other body of government for June 4th, 2008 is almost here already and then it may be too late for my children and me. They have refused to act over and over and over. They have refused for 88 years and their excuse is that they are waiting upon a ruling from this court. We may not survive this grievous injury and harm. This court must restore my ability to protect myself and to prevent future injury and harm from occurring. It must.
The document exactly reads “liberty” and the 19th amendment was passed, but in actual reality women do not have their right of liberty; it is not yet realized. Equal protection and due process is denied them, as this court has not ruled for them. If you deny any group equal protection and due process it is then impossible to have liberty; it is not your protected right. Equal protection and due process must come first and then liberty is made real.
The discrimination of all women and of me alone will only worsen after the November elections unless I am heard. Iraq cannot possibly form a just constitutional government unless we ourselves are first willing to accord our own female citizens this same thing. We must set the example.
It is discrimination of my person to think another citizen can make this case but that I cannot.
Americans do not need protection from the issues and to do that is not safe. To deny me is to say that you must protect me from me and all of us from the Declaration and Constitution when the fact is no person on Earth needs protection from American law. Our law is one in which participation is absolutely necessary and indeed, it was a lack of participation - the failure of others to act and to fulfill their duties under our law - which made my case come to be what it is.
It is not actual treason; at some point it will rise to actual treason, as our government and law will be overthrown as evidenced by the state of my own life. As a citizen, my personhood, born with the creation of this universe and then the signing of our Declaration, and set in motion and on fire with a gunshot, will be overthrown; I will be legally designated an animal and not a human as will all women by this denial.
I will be wholly and absolutely for the Declaration and Constitution but it will not be for me.
Conclusion:
This is demonstrably a first impression case dealing with the very construction of our governing documents themselves and of the construction of creation itself, and of the inviolate fact that women must be accorded full rights and that my own must be restored as we give actual birth to the federal property which counts for everything: Living people. If this does not happen we will cease to exist as a nation at some future point.
FL acted to investigate me for child abuse citing this very petition, this very denial and the facts that I had faith in God, faith in US law, faith in the Supreme Court and that I had filed in the Supreme Court. This occurred on the day I was denied hearing and was because of that denial. Rensselaer County, NY is currently undertaking action and has named me as the defendant in a petition, a petition seeking to terminate my parental rights in a de facto manner by not allowing for any visitation except in NY, an impossible standard for me to meet. This is emotional abuse but yet this state denies its existence and ignores its own written code naming emotional abuse. It is ignoring that my children were kidnapped in 1998 and that all court action in the last ten years, an entire decade, was and is in violation of our law. It is denying an actual, true emergency as life and death is at stake. It seeks to injure and harm me by continuing the injury my children and I suffer into their adult lives and beyond. It will serve to work a corruption of blood if this court does not intervene.
This NY petition is based solely upon me attempting to exercise my rights by filing in the Supreme Court of the US. This NY petition is supported by nothing more than my exact filing, the notice of suit, this court’s own docket and it states that a falsehood, a lie: That this court dismissed my case. It manipulates the English language as if to make it seem that a woman named Susan Herbert who attempts to secure her rights the only way in which she can at this point - by entering this court - is a criminal who broke the law and is unsafe or otherwise defective. Incredulously, it uses the Supreme Court itself to “prove” that I am these things and in so doing the NY petition itself violates US law: Art. 4 Sec. 4, the 14th and 19th amendments and the 1st amendment, the amendment that may be the reasoning we have survived and flourished so well in such a short time on Earth.
It insinuates that possessing a true belief in a Creator, a true belief in The Supreme Court of the United States and/or a true belief in the law of the US is not normal, is unsafe and is proof that I might abuse my children or that I might be mentally unstable and so, my sons need NY to protect them from me, from this Supreme Court and from the law of the US. It defames, libels and slanders the only persons who have ever taken accountability and responsibility for any injury their actions caused to me and my sons: The clerks of the Supreme Court of the United States.
The Supreme Court must not let NY do this to me or to any other woman or child. Now, the Supreme Court must not only act for my person but for its own self.
This case involves the fundamental right of female citizens to empower their persons via the law and access to our courts, a first amendment right, so that they can and may triumph over any adversity or injury, and any manner of injustice they might be subjected to no matter how large, improbable or seemingly insurmountable it may be, as it is my one vote, a vote I was born into as right, that empowers me and as a woman comes into this world with everything she is ever going to need in life already: Her person - her heart and her mind. This right exists in the Declaration first and then is exactly stated in our Constitution and Bill of Rights. The 19th amendment was never needed and neither was the 14th but they exist. They exist and like Brown the citizens and now the authorities once again want and need a ruling from this court before they live them out as real. This court must empower my self and all women to will an equitable government and equitable law into being.
While my approach in reasoning our law may be unique it is not unknown as our founders themselves reasoned that nature or that Creator endowed them with the right of liberty. It is not for man to legislate this right as being, as it exists independently of man; it came into existence with this universe. Liberty is what I seek to exercise as a woman and liberty is realized as law; denying me would be setting an impossible standard for me or for any other person to overcome as NY has now officially named God and the Supreme Court as reasoning to injure a mother and children so the death of my person and our law is imminent as it then makes creation of law or the enforcement of law impossible as I was harmed because I was born in America and because I filed in this court; it makes filing in the Supreme Court of the United States a de facto crime for which one - a woman only or my person only - can then be punished by the state. Remedy and relief is now only available in this court. And, it is imperative as this court cannot possibly know the exact details of God and so, cannot know how long I have to live; how long it will be before my actual, physical death occurs.
The Executive and the Congress cannot possibly create law or apply the law justly if they never come to hear my unique intellectual property: All of my reasoning; my whole case. I have no other effective means of doing this as all have failed me, some more than three times. This is not an exaggeration; it is fact and one can find this same thing all over the historical record of Earth.
We are exactly mimicking the fall of Rome and as our founders taught us, we do not need to make this mistake. All we need to do is what Americans do best: The thing no other nation has the courage or the willingness to do as America always and forever volunteers to do that - what has never been done before and which seems as if it is impossible. America and Americans make miracles happen with deliberation; they will miracles into being with full knowing. The odds against America do not frighten her as she is a God loving nation and so fear is unconstitutional.
If this court considers no federal question other than “Is God actual reality and if so, is Susan a human being created equivalent to any man and does Marbury V Madison then apply to her and to all other women?” a re-hearing and Writ of Prohibition must be granted due to FL and Rensselaer County, NY’s newest actions. There exists no other remedy and relief; no other legal resolution is possible or is available as our Creator and this very court itself are exactly named.
Our law is that we are all volunteers. I, my own self, volunteered to place myself before this court in spite of the ridicule I suffered and no matter how hard it forced me to work and no matter what I had to sacrifice. I am well aware of how my petition reads and what it is at first deemed to be: A joke, as men do not personally believe that a woman, acting on her own, could make a case that they and all other Americans have failed to yet make. They cannot get past a personal mistaken belief - personal unwritten unjust policy - which says that a woman cannot possibly be an actual genius as even my intelligence has been cited more than once and cannot possibly empower her own self to a place beyond the invisible limits they have set for her as my willingness and my successful attempt to file have now been cited. They have changed the question and the condition until the only thing left is to effectively state via the NY petition She is still alive; we want and need to kill her and kill the idea of her in her children.
The third parties, the authorities and the citizens deny the reality that will is the distinct power of a woman and that no man can or will ever come to give birth to actual living government and law, people, but only to the institutions of government and law while women give birth to it all. The core legal principle of my petition must be considered:
Our founders named a “Creator” and stated, with exact words, that “men” are “endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights” and that “among these rights are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”. I, as a lone, absolute woman, who also represents the whole class, am here to claim liberty as the inalienable right of a female citizen.
I, Susan, am an act of God.
I stake this claim first in my own name as the exact, absolute person SUSAN HERBERT, then in the names of my sons, ETHAN and CHRISTOPHER, and then in the name of all women and their children:
FUTURE AMERICANS.
I pray the court grants this petition.
Susan Herbert