STATEMENT OF CASE
Statement of Case
This is the most extraordinary case in all of
Due to perjured statements and due to this court’s failure to award me any
remedy and relief when it is available and then due to the actions of local
police I was then forced to file for an emergency change of venue in Duval
County FL on the very day I was denied by this court in April of 2008. Thus I
have an action open in Duval County FL that has sat and sat as Duval refuses to
allow me to appear pro se and as FL is attempting to avoid my case at all costs
as it began here in 1995 and 1996 with a federal and state violation of my
rights and the rights of both of my sons one of whom was unborn at the
time.
By appearing simultaneously in two local district
local district courts in two states and in US Supreme Court upon the same claim
I then appeared in all
In over ten years of acting to enforce the law on my behalf I have never
once been accorded any relief at all. Now I am not only denied any appearance
in person but the sitting judiciary has begun pulling filed documents and
ordering clerks to pull them after they have acted upon them thus I am now not
‘allowed’ to appear on paper. I have exhausted all other options and all other
courts. I have almost exhausted this court and may be forced to get myself
arrested upon federal criminal charges to then prove my case against this
Court, Obama and this nation.
Lawyers, politicians and judges have become a privileged class granted an
honor no other citizen has – exclusive access to certain offices of power and
argument in person before this court – and so blanket immunity from any and all
named consequence under our law as they refuse to uphold, obey and enforce it
and now go so far as to conspire to overthrow our law. Citizens have no means
to exercise their rights as they cannot secure them as these people now act as
if they are members of a criminal enterprise, the bar and bar associations, and
so as if they are gangsters. In my case? At last count
at least 11 of the RICO Act’s named activities have been perpetrated upon me
and my children including kidnapping and this is done to keep me from
testifying in federal court expressly and specifically SCOTUS. When Judges are
participating? It constitutes treason but this illegal paper government insists
as long as not one ‘authority’ is willing to act against them then they are not
guilty as they are making up the paper as they go along thus they can and will
do anything they wish in spite of what our Constitution is and says. In fact
what they did and are doing never happened as long as no paper naming it
exists. When I then went and secured that paper, the SCOTUS docket listing me
as a nonlawyer pro se plaintiff who directly entered and forced direct action
upon the
Both of my cases which were before this court and were denied any remedy and
relief in violation of the law and all prior federal precedent are inextricably
linked to the 2008 election of the President and Commander in Chief which then
resulted in Barack Obama becoming the President elect and eventually sitting
when he is a person who is guilty of harming me by failing to act for me or to
answer a notice of suit I served upon him, or to answer a summary of my suit or
to answer an emergency letter I sent him concerning a constitutional challenge
regarding this war and my person. He also referred to my person as “garbage” or
rather his representatives who he hired did. Barack Obama refused over and over
to acknowledge me, my children, our plight or my case in any way and I cannot
ignore this is due to the very nature of my suit and my legal claim: I am the
person Obama had to unseat or defeat to then act as President and Commander not
John McCain and not George Bush Jr. as I am the acting legal President while
Bush Jr. actually sat and now Obama does as our law names the difference
between legal and actual reality and only I fulfilled the oath of office thus
fulfilled both governing contracts.
Barack Obama now representing the US as President when his election is
itself a violation of our law and my rights let injury befall my person and my
children’s persons and allowed innocent citizens some of who are mothers and
enlisted service members to die. I alone am the only citizen able to bring this
suit as I lived to tell and I have the ability and capability to act pro se.
Unbelievably the Chief Justice of this court or his agent then committed what
is a crime personal in nature against me as he received an application for a
stay, acted upon the knowledge within it but then hid it from the public by
refusing to file it. In short he illegally circumvented the injured class
– me, all women, enlisted service members and the pro se – when he did not have
the legal power or moral authority to do so as his very appointment is not
legal – yet. It is personal as I’m unique; it cannot be anything other
than personal or I would not be unique in all of SCOTUS history! This is a
crime personal in nature due to the contents of that application as I not a
lawyer authored it. This court cannot now refuse to address a monstrous
legal situation it itself created by refusing to obey
For the same reason it is a criminal act as issue and jurisdiction are one
and the same and always were due to my very first contact with SCOTUS. It may
not be a crime but only mistake or may even be a genius legal maneuver due
to the contents of the application itself, lol. This court and its
Chief may not have known something that I did as it is not on the paper as I
truly believed it is obvious when it may not be. Plus the Founders never
promised me fair or easy and in fact informed me it would be
unfair and most difficult of all. Thus here I am still as I’m forever pro
se and as I am acting to claim my award unlike William Marbury who did not act
upon leaving SCOTUS as
I, Susan, the living person acting PROVE Marbury and SCOTUS is our
law as it is organic to We The People and not the illegal paper government now
sitting that has no relation to either our living or dead Constitution. To
become the law SCOTUS and its Chief must hear me in person as no nonlawyer or
nonpaper constitution has appeared before SCOTUS and until or unless one does?
SCOTUS is not law but only theory and so actual criminals can and do negate its
rulings; they can and do deny us liberty and justice as a living citizen who is
of the living, constitutionally set government only and so not of any paper
like a law diploma, college degree, law license or two required outside
signatures as references then has no legal recourse when injured as the
Constitution and the ability to enforce it via order of the court is not real
or actual for them. It accords their power and authority to the paper instead
of to the person and this is not our law as WE THE PEOPLE EMPOWER THE PAPER AND
SCOTUS NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND!
It’s not humanly possible for me to empower my paper documents and so lend
my conscious awareness to the Constitution and SCOTUS unless I appear in person
as I have no lawyer and never will as the lawyer who can make my case for me
does not exist. If my injury is partially the result of no nonlawyers ever
arguing before SCOTUS and no woman being allowed direct entry and/or entry to
then make her own case I must then act pro se for to hire a lawyer is then to
lose my federal standing. My case is a constitutional authority case thus
I not my lawyer must act to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution
before SCOTUS and on behalf of SCOTUS thus The People. So then SCOTUS and its
Chief (or a clerk acting as an agent of a Justice) had no choice but to injure
me and with full knowing and deliberation as if they did not? MAKING THIS LEGAL
ARGUMENT WOULD THEN BE IMPOSSIBLE. I COULD NEVER SECURE JUSTICE.
The denial of oral argument and now any appearance at all in any form along
with the failure of the Solicitor General to respond make my case and proves
all I claim for if even one office remained checked or even one other person
was obeying both the law and the spirit of the law then I would not be writing
this as my case would be resolved or it never would have gone on for ten years
across several states until it landed in United States Supreme Court as an
authority case of original jurisdiction as this would then be impossible.
Monell V DSS upheld a citizen’s right to sue to enforce the law; Bush
V Gore set precedent allowing me to sue for legal power and custody of the
US; Marbury, never applied to women, states I must defy illegal,
unethical and immoral orders of commanding officers and that I am equal to all
other citizens up to and including the President as my one vote, denied me
since before 2000, is equivalent to Executive Order; Brown proved
discrimination causes a physical and emotional injury to the class and proof
was life not science and not the exact words of our law as “black” appears no
where in our law and the science did not exist until the 1970’s. I am a woman
and a member of the only injured class still denied a federal ruling in their
favor a la Brown. As a woman the 19th amendment, the equal
protection clauses and the exact words of our law as written in 1776 & 1787
clearly state I am to be accorded equal legal power but this legal power has
not once been realized so my vote has been nothing more than an appearance as I
went through the motion of voting when it was meaningless. Since before 2000 I
was and am denied my vote; I have been lied to by those holding office, the law
has never protected me at all as it is renegotiated against my will via force
and as I was born into harm in both this national family and my own nuclear
family as women are subjected to unsafe conditions and so as safety is denied
us as is liberty, as liberty is an emotion and a protected right and liberty is
realized as justice, then I nor any woman is safe as justice is nonexistent for
us.
Today I have been subjected to even newer injury since I brought forth my
first petition: The citizens have acted to elect a person to the office of
President based only upon an appearance – “black” – as they have reasoned and
decided that appearance then equals justice when it does not and when their
decision flies in the face of actual reality and our law and the NY courts have
once again unconstitutionally acted to deny me my liberty rights and did so
after denying me any appearance as both my testimony on paper and in person was
wholly ignored and labeled not of any meaning or consequence in a custody action
when I am the birth mother and it is third parties opposing me. A man who
cannot possibly fulfill the oath of office and who has a conflict of interests
he can never overcome, who stated he would not because he could reason
constitutional law on behalf of women and their children as defining life was
beyond him, who refused to answer the notice of suit I sent him, who refuses to
let any citizen see his original birth certificate as if it contains some kind
of super-secret information and who has announced he will break the law and
even subject women to double jeopardy is now the President elect and violent
and unrelated men have been awarded control of my person and my children as if
they actually own us. See my Reasoning below. The citizens have then committed
treason as Bush V Gore which remains a tie as it is not 9 as 5-4 as 1 as
that is bad math and not our law and In Re Susan Herbert went
unajudicated as did the violation of Marbury at the time the citizens
voted for President and all had notification their vote for Obama or McCain
would then rise to an act of treason as it would become treason as we
are at actual war and as it would result in the death of our Constitutional
Republic both legally and physically if either man was then installed as President.
They had access to the docket and I myself made several attempts to inform
them. There exists a write in space for just such an emergency. The voters did
not “believe” our written law nor my case as the Supreme Court denied me oral
argument and the citizens have been led to mistakenly believe our law is our
law only if the Supreme Court says so, or that injury is only if the Supreme
Court says so, which is not truth, which defies reality and which is not our
law itself as the federal court does not make law. State and federal
judges acted as if the law does not apply to them or me, as if they could make
up what does not exist and use lies and rule to then support the injury they
are inflicting upon me, making it seem as if it is just when it is not or as if
I deserved to be harmed when no person does.
What’s good for the goose is good for the gander; equal protection and due
process then means if Bush and Gore were able to address the vote and if Bush
was then able to overturn it, then I, Susan, the injured party and a member of
the injured class known as woman or female may then press suit seeking to drive
what is now endemic corruption and discrimination out of our institutions by
informing the people and being awarded constitutional remedy and relief, this
Writ and an appearance in person to give oral argument rather than
unconstitutional remedy and relief as Bush, Obama and the Austin’s were awarded
thus injuring all Americans as it is now the effects of Clinton’s perjury and
failure to resolve a tied decision of this court and Bush V Gore with
all of its effects that harms us as does the denial of justice to my own
person, as there is no actual reason or cause other than woman, genius
and ethical.
All other authority cases and all other original jurisdiction cases were
brought by men on behalf of men and I alone, a woman exactly named Susan
Herbert, was denied oral argument when I specifically asked for hearing as
remedy and relief and hearing in a case of my standing is then automatically both
reading and oral argument. Anything less makes liberty and justice
impossible and is a violation of Marbury. This court denied me oral
argument without any reasoning or just cause; the NY
family court then cited my injury was “forever”. I entered this unconstitutional
finding to this court upon entering In Re Susan a second time. Thus In
Re Susan Herbert became a Bill of Attainder as I alone am unique and have
been treated like no other natural born citizen ever in US history; the refusal
of this court to address injuries it has partially caused is then a Bill of
Attainder in my case as it is in my name only, and it is treason, as it works a
corruption of blood and as it then causes incalculable injury to not only my
immediate biological descents but to my national family which is all citizens,
past, present and future. To be clear, Austin V Herbert and Bush v
Gore became In Re Susan Herbert and now Susan V Obama, Roberts
and the US thus I became subject to what constitutes a Bill of Attainder as
my name alone appears on my case as I have no legal representation and this was
deemed to be “forever”. As I am my own attorney then this means I will forever
be banned from appearing in court in person as a petitioner or plaintiff and so
forever be banned from adjudicating my injury. “Forever pro se” means I am the
last American citizen standing in defense of our law, as I am also forever
constitutional authority and original jurisdiction.
As loopy as it sounds if your issue is SCOTUS aka the Constitution and the
legal authority both paper and living thus you’re a pro se authority case a la Marbury
SCOTUS had to injure you thus your very injury opens up the avenue to
sue to then restore justice and so restore constitutional authority. I needed
and wanted a denial as I claimed I had no protection of the law; if SCOTUS then
granted me protection via granting a Writ I would have protection of
the law but no case. I MEANT TO MAKE IT VERY PERSONAL TO THEN FORCE SCOTUS’
HAND THUS SCOTUS, THE CLERKS AND ROBERTS ARE IMMUNE; THEY ACTED AS I NEEDED
THEM TO ACT. Who cares why as long as we got here: In a position to
PROVE our form of government along with Marbury V Madison is the most
perfect of all.
I blamed and faulted Roberts and the clerks as I could as it happened to me
and to then sneak my case past the sitting crooks, as I always knew I would
have to enter my case backwards thus file it whole, with a brief, upon
exhausting the process as that is the only way if you are a woman and if you
cannot tell SCOTUS what it does not know about the injury any other way as all
access to the legal system including an appearance in person or on
paper is denied you. Who can fault SCOTUS for being composed of lawyers citing
SCOTUS rule and tradition as inviolate law if it does not realize LAWYER and/or
PAPER is my legal problem and so caused the injury? Thus filing and so hearing
me on paper only is then an exact violation of my rights and the whole law
itself as we are a living not dead government?
Upon tangling with the Federal Appeals court and upon receiving a
ridiculous, outrageous order that instructs a clerk to PHYSICALLY UNFILE an
acted upon motion to then deny me any appearance at all in any form thus
denying The People the knowledge contained within that motion so that liberty
and justice is then made impossible to secure in any way whatsoever I am back
to try this again as now…my brief exists. I can and will lend it my
conscious awareness in person. I can and so did enter my SCOTUS case whole as
any true, actual authority case of original jurisdiction must be entered whole.
Thus no action on SCOTUS part is actually criminal if it occurred BEFORE I
created and entered my brief and BEFORE I objected in SCOTUS’ name as well as
my own to the illegal government’s criminal actions and before I revealed the
facts in my motion. SCOTUS can’t possibly be guilty of a criminal act if I
could not reveal specific facts due to safety concerns as I and my sons were
and are exposed to mortal danger and not one citizen is willing to defend us.
As long as SCOTUS told me its truth no matter what that truth is then it is not
in violation of the spirit of our law. The citizens do not know: If the living
constitution known as We The People is attacked? If that’s possible and happens? Then the employees of SCOTUS
are too under direct attack and unless The People defend them they have no
defense other than the
As long as Marbury and SCOTUS remain unproven theory lower courts can
and do exert overly broad power, claim unjust privileges and exploit power to
their advantage and to the advantage of their friends and associates, fellow
lawyers and/or politicians. These judges actually believe that power is
theirs to give or take! They actually believe that they can and may take from
you what is inalienable. They truly believe they can violate the law yet then
claim they are acting under the authority of the
These judges and all the involved people in my case can and did read the
SCOTUS docket but yet DENIED the Constitution as if…no court but SCOTUS
must obey the Constitution! As if no citizen has to
obey it unless a court says so. Thus to make it seem as if pull
my documents or deny all of what I enter including my spoken words. Lower
courts effectively make the illegal and criminal actions of the other branches
possible as they refuse to obey the Constitution and use the excuse SCOTUS HAS
NOT YET TOLD ME THAT THE JUDICIARY HAS TO OBEY THE LAW; AS SCOTUS IS NOT
CONSTITUTIONAL ITSELF IT THEN MAY NOT ORDER THE LOWER JUDICIARY TO OBEY THE
CONSTITUTION AS TO DO THAT A NONLAWYER HAS TO GAIN ENTRY IN PERSON, OR IN OTHER
WORDS, IT MAY NOT ORDER ME, A JUDGE, TO DO WHAT THEY THEMSELVES DO NOT DO, OBEY
THE CONSTITUTION aka OBEY YOU, A PRO SE PLAINTIFF WHO IS ALSO THE VICTIM THUS
NOT AN AUTHORITY AS NO PAPER SAYS YOU ARE AS IF YOU HAD THAT PAPER? YOU
WOULDN’T BE A VICTIM, WOULD YOU? Meaning: “If you cannot get a paper
from SCOTUS saying you are an authority and your vote has power than you aren’t
and it doesn’t; no power and authority for you no matter what the Constitution
says!”
Acting in a hostile and violent manner, a criminal manner, always
worked for them before as the litigant went away without securing the paper
from SCOTUS but I did not. I knew there was a way to get a ruling from SCOTUS
even if you never set foot inside the building: Engage SCOTUS, suffer the
injury to then prove to SCOTUS the law has been overthrown and so force direct
action as SCOTUS would be moved by your reasoning on your paper as you have
entered sworn testimony not hearsay and not your lawyers words. You have
entered this claim: I WILL SO I AM. You’re first. Thus as I refused to stop
acting they were left with no choice: Commit a crime or obey the law. You’d
think that would be simple, wouldn’t you? That judges and other officers of the
court would then obey the law. Not if they have a reason to violate the law:
power and control not the constitutionally named power and
authority. A violation of Art.
4 Sec. 4 as it is federal domestic violence thus it is treason as it constitutes
war upon The People, the named legal government, as it denies us a
Republican form of government aka a
I have now proven conclusively that justice no longer exists and that it is
not possible for me to receive redress in a lower court or in any other branch
as the illegal authorities do not want to be held liable as they know as fact
they are guilty which is why they operate so directly and openly, as no means
to exercise our right of dissolution exists if we may not sue them. I however
proved that the
I, Susan, said via my legal claim, I came here AFTER having accessed
SCOTUS, remember? Thus all you can do is obey the law or commit a crime and in
my case? You will be made to answer for it. I can and will prove SCOTUS is our
law thus is constitutional as only SCOTUS the institution as it exists today is
a product of the constitutional government as am I, as I possess that one piece
of paper no other nonlawyer ever came to possess as if a pro se nonlawyer was
conferenced? It was not done upon the issuance of an Executive Order as mine
was! and so I entered the legal history and my reasoning plus Congress’,
the military’s and the 10th Circuit’s acknowledgment of the fact and law
regarding authority being of The People or the lone citizen via a vote thus
the truth of my power and authority was then UNFILED, lol, as NOTHING would
then make any action except ruling for me thus for SCOTUS and for The People
legal. All you can do is avoid it completely by pretending you never read
it and then pulling it for good measure. They violated the law and all
federal precedent with deliberation and full knowing thus spitting on our
Constitution and on me personally thus it is a criminal act. Even devoid of a
ruling that they are not acting under the authority of the
“Sorry fellas! I do possess that paper as it is the SCOTUS case conferencing
list based upon an Executive Order I issued thus you had to unfile this motion
to then get around SCOTUS thus The People and so the Constitution, as that is
the only way – remove it from the files – or so you thought didn’t you? Wrong,
as you have now denied me an appearance on paper and have ordered a clerk to
commit what is a crime: evidence tampering, witness intimidation, threatening the
life of the legal or constitutionally set President and obstruction of justice
otherwise known as treason if a federal judge does it with full knowing and
deliberation. I gave you, this entire bench, all of the facts I was forced
to keep secret previously thus you of all people KNEW but did it regardless. As
I’m the only one ever it is personal. You can’t unfile what your very
action has already filed and you cannot unfile what SCOTUS has already
physically filed twice and heard twice and like you filed and heard via action
a third time thus already ruled FOR me thus FOR The People. It’s not possible
to undo what is done. You do not possess that power, as it does not exist in
this universe let alone this nation. That power is not to be found within our Constitution,
as it isn’t and it never will be. Like I’m forever pro se your action
is forever a part of the historical record of Earth and then the universe. It
is now a part of the unified field. Of time and space.
Evidence rising to proof? The dates or numbers on the
SCOTUS docket are the ruling for me not the words as the dates prove
the US, you, are in default. The word DENIED is my means to then sue for
liability as that is my exact legal claim: I am DENIED any and all protection
of the law thus SCOTUS has concurred with me. Pull all the documents you want,
as that never changes what SCOTUS has already done; what already is. If you,
the 11th Circuit Federal Appeals Court, truly believe you can deny The People
including SCOTUS what is inalienable then I will dissolve and abolish you and
your criminal belief as you have just ordered SCOTUS thus The People out of
existence in favor of paper. In favor of the crooks and
the illegal or dead government. You have acted against Congress and
the military even. That’s desperate; guilty people act desperate. You just gave
SCOTUS the only reason it needs to hear me in person as you, the 11th Circuit,
made SCOTUS’ actual existence thus We The People’s actual existence the prize.
I truly believe SCOTUS is going to want to hear the case that legalizes them as
it proves they are Constitutional. They are law not theory. The only thing
SCOTUS has to do is act to then prove it to their own selves by granting me my
award and so hearing me in person. All SCOTUS has to do is TRUST
THE PEOPLE!!! Inform them and then TRUST THEM TO GOVERN
THEMSELVES VIA OBEYING THE SCOTUS RULING AND THE CONSTITUTION!!!”
Read the rest of this paper and then see my attached Federal Appellate
motion and brief as an actual original jurisdiction case enters whole.