REASONS TO GRANT WRIT
Reasoning To
Grant Writ
Some of but not all of the constitutional reasoning which invalidates the
results of this election and all prior court orders against me from day one, as
appearances are deceiving and ‘black’ is not the issue the voters should be
citing nor should the lower courts be resorting to actions that meet or exceed
the legal definition of a crime in my case. Instead judges and voters should be
citing my injury, the discrimination of women, lies made to seem like the truth
and illegal actions that are made to seem as if they are legal; they
should be citing the Constitution and US case law as well as US history
and their math should add up correctly as no court order then changes
what is actual fact and law:
1. A majority, the whole court even, is likely to
rule for me thus securing their constitutional authority once again by
upholding Marbury on behalf of myself then all
women and their children both male and female thus all Americans and applicant
is likely to prevail on the merits as it is math and exact words of our law
plus the exact words of prior federal precedent as well as actual biology. My
case is supported by proven scientific fact, my own experience of this American
life and eyewitness testimony. I am the only person ever to be granted the
standing of pro se, authority and original jurisdiction and I have done it
twice over as Marbury never owned the knowledge of
what his legal standing is. I have chosen to say too much rather than
not enough thus proving I can make this case if this stay is granted
and win on the merits of my case; you will mostly find the merits of my
case within the attached brief and motion to reconsider. I know one usually
would not outline the case to be filed in a petition for a Writ of Cert but this
is an original case SCOTUS should have heard firstly and I am not a lawyer. Thus
I recapped the acted upon emergency application below for the citizens benefit
and then attached what the lower court refused to acknowledge – my brief and
motion – as it is the citizens who are not lawyers who need informing.
2.
This election was never legal as Bush V Gore was not legal and remains a
tied decision. No Presidential election and indeed, no election at all, is legal and so valid unless Bush V Gore is
addressed. By addressing Bush V Gore and In Re Susan and now Susan
V Obama, you then address all others. Bush V
Gore is an extreme test of chain of command theory which is how and why it
became an illegally waged war; Bush V Gore is the citizens unchecking all offices up to Chief Justice by refusing to
obey the law, reason their vote and/or obey the spirit of our law; it is the
citizens reasoning and deciding they are powerless victims and so actually
becoming powerless victims.
3.
Bush V Gore is a Chief Justice unchecking
himself, the Justices voting twice for President, 9 as 5-4 as 2 not 1, or, 5 as
1 V 4 as 1, a tie, and an illegal third party custody award of my person to
lawyers – men – not on the ballot. It is also two persons proving they cannot
fulfill the oath of office, as they did not act pro se. The only form of the
power of one the Supreme Court may invoke is 9 as 1 or 1 alone but never per curiam especially in the case of a Presidential election as
any dissent means the math will never match the exact
words of our law or federal precedent. See Exhibits L & M. [A sitting
President does decide ties in US Supreme Court; a case of original
jurisdiction has no lower or other court ruling plus authority cases by their
very nature are challenging the people and the Congress as the inherency or
implication is the people and Congress have failed to act or failed to fulfill
duty already thus the case enters Supreme Court, so if tied it then goes to the
President as a tie then is a case thrown to the people who are embodied by the
sitting President as he or she is their one vote realized as executive order. A
President and Chief Justice are equivalent legal authorities; a President
enforces the law and/or the correct application of it not a lower
court. Remember both litigants have entered an honor bond and so it is accepted
as fact they voted and so accessed chain of command and secured federal
standing thus they are to trust the decision of a sitting President aka their own self and their fellow citizens. A President
calls the tie by issuing his or her own reasoned decision, as we do not vote on
our law as it is. If a President issues an
unconstitutional decision? Then Congress can and may act, then a citizen
may press another suit or then a citizen may even refuse to obey, as may all citizens. This is WHY you are to reason your vote. I
have no idea where, why or how men came to posses the mistaken belief a tie is
decided by a lower court. If that has happened? It is
incorrect. It was done in error as it then strips a citizen of authority over
their own person and robs their vote of legal power.]
4. Bush V Gore then became a never
legal President then unchecking the office of
President, Chief and the whole court as the only legal appointment of a new
Chief Justice must be one that is arbitrary like old age in this unique case as
the only way to recheck the offices is by arbitrary appointment. Thus, all
offices of government were then unchecked; no person is in charge and/or all
separation of power is grossly violated; not one authority is fulfilling his or
her oath of office or discharging their duties and no person knew the actual
reasoning to then overturn Bush V Gore when ignorance is not an excuse.
Whole schools of law failed. Not one authority I contacted obeyed the law and
some even broke it. The citizens violated Marbury
first as they obeyed the unconstitutional, unethical and immoral orders of
their commanding officers thus they are then liable as proven by their
willingness to continue to pay taxes levied unjustly (w/o representation) and
their willingness to suffer the Bush administration; they began volunteering to
die in defense of the invention of the institution, office of Chief Justice and
President who is also Commander, as all male. As a government and law they
became dead institutions. The election of 2004 was no good as Bush should not
have been on the ballot. I had no choice so had no liberty and my right to vote
was denied me yet again. It is still denied me.
5.
Congress enacted Resolution 511, which is nothing short of Congress acting to
overthrow the law by overthrowing the office of the Executive; 511 states that
persons who do not meet the qualifications to then fulfill the requirement of
natural birth may run and be elected. This then changes the form of our
government to one that is an oligarchy not a Republic. Congress not only
committed what is an overt act of treason as I informed all 100 senators and
many Reps – dozens even and same twice over – but this Resolution was sponsored
by persons who knew they did not meet this qualification or were in conflict of
the interest thus members of Congress acted to change our law and our form of
government only to then benefit members of Congress as only members of Congress
were on the ballot in all 50 states and in the district of Columbia. Appendix T.
6.
The declaration of war is no good as it is based upon bad evidence. Congress
declares war therefore Congress is to address this declaration by issuing a new
one based upon good evidence, invalidating the bad one and not re-issuing it
and/or presenting new evidence to then support the bad one thus making it good.
Congress did no such thing thus our Constitution was violated in an absolute
fashion. May a Congress declare a war upon bad evidence and then act as the
Commander? Congress has acted to usurp the duties of the commander via
commanding by committee – a vote of Congress and abuse of the War Powers Act –
and this is not legal or practical. You do not command via committee; Barack Obama has already said he
cannot and will not make decisions alone as he said he would make ‘no
decisions re “Don’t Ask” by himself’. He then named zero constitutional
reasoning for its recent revocation.
7.
Congress then used money to prevent the person the voters believed to be the
legal Commander when he is not from discharging his duties and from waging
‘effective’ war. Thus enlisted service member’s lives were traded upon the
dollar. Enlisted service members are the innocent children of women who are
mothers; they are all volunteer and the military is controlled by the civilians
– us. We even have a civilian Commander. Congress is supposed to represent or
be WE, the people. It does not and is not; one of the most grievous offenses
any office holder can commit is trading the lives of the innocent upon money,
especially enlisted service members and mothers then all women and children and
so all Americans. Not one member fulfilled his oath of office thus NO MEMBER OF
CONGRESS CAN THEN OVERCOME THE CONFLICT OF INTERESTS TO THEN ACT AS COMMANDER. Obama and McCain equally then were automatically excluded
from the ballot as YOU do not get to amend our law in a manner not legal or to
elect persons not able to fulfill the Presidential oath of office. The voters
are creating a situation that is not only absolutely and wholly
unconstitutional but that then denies enlisted service members, mothers and all
other women and children their liberty rights and so zero opportunity. No
liberty then no justice. Our common interest is to be the law; obviously
Congress has reasoned and decided then forced it upon the voters as the voters
allowed it and even condoned it: Congress no longer obeys the law at al; it
does not have to so it will not. It only seems as if and even that façade
is quickly deteriorating. Recently Congress has been printing up or creating
energy – money – that does not exist and doing so to protect private interests
at my expense. Congress’ interest is money and the privilege they are accorded
via a title. It is perceived power. The voters have given them power that is
not theirs by voting them into office over and over even when they admit they
have behaved criminally and/or do not know the law. The voters violated the
separation of powers first.
8.
Neither major party candidate has clean hands and
neither can actually do anything they have promised to do, as it is humanly
impossible for them. For instance, to institute any kind of economic recovery
plan? First you must name the exact problem – the cause – and all of its
effects and then you must know what our dollar actually is and what standard
supports it. Neither candidate does. Obama has no
clue; he can hope all he wants but nothing he claims will actually happen as
ideas are the cause of things and he has none but the same old, tired and used
ideas that have not worked and will never work when it comes to money. He truly
believes we do not control things like inflation and deflation and that we can
legally and actually conduct business with nations who can never return the
honor bond and not suffer for it. This extends to every area and every problem
our nation faces. If a “plan” of his does seem to make things better? He
violated the laws that rule this universe, he violated our written law and/or
it only seems as if; it is not an actual solution but may be a temporary ‘fix’.
9.
Unity is not possible unless you can reason and apply the equal protection
clauses to women and their children. The promise of Brown will never be
realized unless this occurs, as all actual rights are human rights as there is
no such thing as women’s rights. Money does not resolve this issue. You must
define when life and so personhood or the right comes into being. A man cannot
do this ever, ever, ever as he will not give birth thus he can never own as
fact the knowledge. The only way he can do this is by asking a woman for help
as in voting for her for President or appointing her Chief Justice. Obama missed the boat when it came to securing the office
of chief Justice by rechecking it. This woman? I have
no desire to be Chief Justice or even a Justice as I have been sitting and
thinking about the universe for 40 years. Justices do a lot of that – sitting
and thinking –but they do not make law unless they stand down a sitting
President. Obama has already said it is “above [his] paygrade” to reason this thus he cannot and so will not
reason and apply the equal protection clauses to women and their children and
he failed when it came to standing down this illegal federal government.
It is not legal to subject me to the moral authority of a man who has none as
he will not name it; no man is safe if he refuses to define his beliefs on when
life begins and this issue affects women and children only. It is my life
and/or the quality of my life that is at stake not his. This
effects women and children but not adult men.
10.
Only mothers and veterans have a protected right to hold this office; all
others have the privilege as only mothers and veterans have proven they can and
will shed their blood and risk their life in defense of the Constitution or WE,
the people. Obama then claimed for himself a right that
he does not possess at the expense of able and capable persons who do have a
protected right. McCain? As a veteran he then may be
held to a higher standard, as he then should possess this knowledge re chain of
command theory and illegal war. I am an equal opportunity petitioner as I held
both major party candidates equally at fault as no third party could or would
win as they lacked the funds to buy the office and so hold them equally unable
and incapable.
11.
Obama claimed he is a constitutional law professor
when he is not. An argument began over the fine differences in words and
technicalities. If I call you “professor” are you then it? If your paycheck
reads “professor” are you then it? He also snuck into and out of
12.
Obama did not keep an honor bound contract and in
fact absolutely and wholly violated at least three by going against his word to
run for this office using public funds only becoming the first person since
1976 to use private money thus this election was bought. There is no polite way
to say this: If you cannot keep an honor bound contract, if you default before
you enter the office of President, you may not then be legally elected, as
taking the oath is then a lie as Obama had the human
ability to keep that contract but did not as he was greedy for the office. I
have no way to trace all of that money and this privatization of the election
gives large businesses and their interests an unfair advantage.
13.
Obama ignored several notices of suit as he is named
in my federal lawsuit now before US Supreme Court. He refused to respond over
and over. He also kept inundating my mailbox with requests for money thus
enticing me to break the law and harassing me, which is a crime. I cannot
overlook this due to the very nature of my suit: Justice is, as fact w/o
question, now bought and sold as that is what buying an election and violating Marbury and so unchecking
all offices is. I repeatedly sent him cease and desist
orders all of which went ignored.
14.
Corinne Brown who was so vociferous in her opposition to Bush V Gore and
stated repeatedly that she felt as if her vote had been stolen ignored me, as
did the NAACP. I was told to my face by a citizen who appears to be black that
this most likely happened as no black person or black organization was going to
help me, no matter how tragic my personal situation was, to unseat a
Presidential candidate who was black. I was stunned, as this thought had not
once entered my mind. Now I must consider it. Not only must I consider my
appearance as white and Obama’s as black may have
caused a part of my legal situation to become worse but I know as fact ‘woman’
did as the person answering the phones for the Jacksonville ACLU told me this.
They said that word: ‘woman’, as a reason I might not be called back. The
NYACLU, when informed of NY’s unconstitutional unwritten policy re emotional
abuse and the details of my federal claim deliberately, knowingly and willingly
waited to answer me until November 20th, but served me notice on
November 23rd. Their answer? It is an exact
lie as the very case now before the Supreme court was
said to be unsupported by evidence or proof when I gave them exactly what I
gave the US Supreme court with one exception: I gave the NYACLU even more
evidence as I also included written, personal testimony. The NYACLU is guilty
of malpractice, several crimes according to NY code and
15.
In my unique case the Supreme Court of the United States and its Chief Justice
then reasoned and ordered itself out of existence as a court of law thus an
authority by actually violating Marbury only
as I am a woman and specifically this exact woman thus my life was sold to the
highest bidder as were my children’s lives. Thus no vote has actual legal power
or any authority but only appears to have it as Marbury
was the decision that then created the Court’s constitutional authority by
vesting the vote with actual legal power and moral authority by making the
President equal to the citizen and so liable thus answerable to the lone
citizen. It matters not how or why Marbury came to be
violated as I know why: The citizens violated the law first and violated over
and over. By violating Marbury, and doing so
to then harm the person who is the actual legal President and Commander, myself,
as this was at first acknowledged by the Court by granting me status no other
citizen has ever been granted and then by obeying Executive Orders I issued and
signed “The acting legal President and Commander” yet denying me oral argument
so that the people were not then informed and denying me and my male children
any and all remedy and relief, but then according terrorists and terror
suspects rights and privileges I was denied as were other women, the Court
overthrew our law. Again we all know why and how it came to pass: The citizens
are at fault. It was, in effect, a coup as a coup in American is silent but
then becomes violent. It remains a coup. The coup had to be pre-existing or
before I entered SCOTUS directly or direct entry would not have been possible.
You can but you may not hold a Presidential election if it is a coup. There is
nothing orderly about a $5.3 billion dollar transfer of power whereby people
are still starving and going w/o basic healthcare so that a child dies of an
infected tooth. A coup is coup no matter what it looks like – bloody or papery.
16.
The only possible way to then recheck all offices and so balance all power and
establish actual equal rights is to then accord me oral argument. You recheck
the offices via telling the exact truth and winning a unanimous decision in
favor of women and their children and all ethical Americans who made an attempt
to obey the law and the spirit of the law. In this case ANY citizen could have
volunteered to recheck the offices if they could then act pro se and make the
case; a citizen could have, if it was then possible, claimed third party
standing on behalf of the US against Bush & Gore as no person was ever
likely to possess the human ability to sue in their own defense thus it then
goes to the first volunteer. I’m that person, as I acted upon my knowledge as
soon as humanly possible for me to do so. The Judiciary’s actions as all are
members of the bar and bar associations now fall under RICO as the bar and bar
associations are acting as a criminal enterprise and their members as
individual agents of crime. To date 11 of the named RICO activities have been
committed and hundreds of incidences have accrued and this was done to stop me
from testifying as a federal witness in a federal case, an application of RICO
that SCOTUS has always upheld. It is a violation of the treason, sedition and
subversive activities clauses and US code first and/or is RICO secondly. It
began and is due to a violation of the equal protection clauses with no
consequences for lawyers or judges who are lawyers or for any titled persons
thus they do what they want when they want without fear; they became criminals.
If lawyers acting as the Judiciary, the Legislative and/or the Executive as
Obama is a lawyer are now RICO then it rises to
treason as treason is the only named crime in our Constitution and so overthrow
aka has for a fact occurred. SCOTUS may not be able
to criminally charge the offenders but it can adjudicate if it falls under
treason and/or RICO so the people then can prosecute them if a charge of
treason, sedition and/or subversive activities is not levied against them or is
not successfully prosecuted as fellow lawyers who sit in violation of our law
would then be in charge of doing what they have refused to do so far: Apply the
law and its named consequences to their associates and friends. Of course
if I win my case as I should then I can and will enforce the law and strictly.
This is another reason why these people are so desperate to keep me out of a
court of law, as I would then enforce the law and they know they are guilty. Proof
is these people are acting guilty as they keep committing more and more crimes.
It is incessant in my case and has never stopped from the first second I entered
a court of law over ten years ago.
17.
I uncovered proof that a 13th amendment to our Constitution exists and was
ratified by VA; as this amendment would then affect lawyers and judges who are
lawyers and who are now a privileged class if it is recognized? Exactly
as my argument regarding equal rights and natural birth and what is already
recognized as being within our law would affect these same persons? You know as
fact I was injured only to keep me from appearing in federal court thus acting
as a witness in federal court as no other explanation exists unless those
involved are set to plead insane as I alone made this unique argument and no
man can bring the case for women as it is humanly impossible for him to do so
unless he gives birth to a baby. These people then possess motivation and
intent. These people, judges, had to read my case, read the
Constitution and read the SCOTUS docket plus all named US case law and then
willingly choose to commit what meets and exceeds the legal definition of
several criminal acts in both the state and federal criminal code. This is
outrageous. See Appendix Q in regards to the missing 13th.
18.
The military has several serious problems and neither McCain nor Obama can clearly articulate what they are and so then fix
them. Obama is for the continuation of the “Don’t Ask
Don’t Tell Policy” which encourages recruits to lie thus violate the honor bond
before they serve a single second, strips recruiters of the ability to reason
and decide if a recruit is fit whether he or she is gay or not as each citizen
must as we are self-governing and self-adjudicating and ignorance is no excuse
and as it yet denies women, even women who are gay, some combat positions
namely the Office of Commander in Chief. It is based upon a lie and appearances
only. Obama does not believe this policy has caused
harm when it does and it harmed me in 1995 and 1996 and Obama
stated that he was for drafting women if a draft was initiated. Drafting women
is unconstitutional as it constitutes double jeopardy as sex and childbirth
always carries the risk of injury and death for women and not men. The draft is
a written proof of death contract and childbirth is a proof of death contract
not in writing until after the fact of actual birth. The draft and pregnancy
are equivalent; birth and war are equivalent. Our law names life, death,
natural birth, war, double jeopardy and a Creator exactly thus defining this. Obama cannot fix what he does not know is wrong or what he
mistakenly believes is legal when it is not; he will only worsen our current
situation and cause a further erosion of our military. Enlisted service
members will die w/o reason or cause. Obama
cannot command in the field as I can or others can and does not know military
tactics and strategy, basic chain of command theory and has never to my
knowledge risked shedding his blood or risked his life in defense of me, my
children or the Constitution or else his name would be on this lawsuit as
co-petitioner or as an adversarial party acting pro se and my life
would not be what it is today: absolutely and wholly unsafe. [Although Obama has since rescinded this policy he never gave any
constitutional reasoning for doing so; no personal policy is ever
constitutional; failing to reason application of the law and calling what is
actually your arbitrary belief “policy” is a means to lie and subvert the
constitution].
19.
Obama believes “gay” is a protected class and is for
giving the rights of women to men who are gay by giving them unfair advantage
and overly broad power compared to women yet denied basic human rights and our
law protects no act of sex not even heterosexual acts as an act of sex is a
choice unless it is forced. The word “sex” was jokingly and mistakenly used in
the Civil Rights Act, as the protected class is women as “female” is a quality
of being human and acts of sex are not. Quality of sex or gender is not a
choice. Rights if you are gay consist of the same rights all citizens have if
they are human and then law abiding. As men and women have one distinction so
do persons who are gay.
20.
It is intrinsic to doing the job of according women and their children thus all
humans true equality and justice that you are an
actual woman, as Obama will not ever know what that
is as absolute fact – at least not in the next 8 years. He cannot reason
equality. The Civil Rights Act allows me and my children or all Americans to
discriminate based only upon man as woman is necessary or intrinsic to do this
job and so not vote or install Obama as President and
Commander only upon male even if no other reasoning existed. Women may also
refuse to obey anything he orders, or, they may legally stop paying taxes and
even legally use violence if necessary. Therefore, as Obama
is a man I openly cite that as my part of my reasoning as hell will freeze over
before yet another man usurps and violates my rights and injures me without
consequence when I am most able and most capable and innocent so I have always
obeyed the law and the spirit of the law and I as a mother possess the
protected right not he and he, by his very nature, cannot perform the job of
President and Commander while I can and did. I still do.
21.
The Equal Time rules were not obeyed or enforced and were exploited for their
four exemptions. Proof would be Oprah Winfrey as she gave Obama
airtime she did not give other candidates as her show qualifies for such an
exemption. Due to Winfrey’s unique situation one cannot ignore her money or
influence in this unique case and one cannot ignore her refusal to answer my
suit or address it in any way. Winfrey also never before did such a thing; she
herself cited black over and over and she campaigned against Bush citing his
record of not according women what she believed to be their rights but did not
hold Obama accountable for the same and even ignored
his “above my paygrade” comment as if he never said
it. Other proof would be Fox broadcasting not allowing
22.
If Marbury is violated then your vote does not
have any legal power or the legal power it has is not equal, as it has now been
made an arbitrary decision of the federal court. A woman’s vote has never had
actual legal power but only the appearance of it. As the vote is your check
then it is not possible to balance power w/o equal legal power and/or any legal
power so the Office of the President has been purchased.
23.
We are supposed to be subject to the terms of a contract not the conditions. We
call it a “term of office” and “term life insurance” for reasoning. Women are
yet the victims of men changing the conditions on them thus while they say they
believe in equality and often act as if they do, their true unspoken belief is
realized as gross injustice and even murder as their true belief is the
citizens are powerless and women are less than so even more powerless; that no
woman can reason and so make this case nor ever act as Commander.
24.
I proved my ability beyond any and all doubt by actually fulfilling the oath
and so acting as President and Commander and by making this case in spite of
every single citizen acting against me and all denying reality and my case. I
defeated the entire federal government acting alone, as I am a power of one. I
know how to use my vote as a weapon. I am the lone citizen standing as I acted
as an actual a Commander is to act by willing government into being and creating
life where there are only dead institutions: In our federal government. President? I have already made law via executive order and
my suit; I have already preserved, protected and defended the Constitution
beyond what was believed to be humanly possible for a woman as my lone vote now
floats this government and law as does one other vote that is the one vote cast
for my person. This vote was cast where all of this began, in FL and the person
who cast it knew of my case. This is FL ballot # 3481 upon which my name for
President and the name of
25.
The
26.
This election and the subsequent court orders are yet more illegal
third party awards of my custody to men, to the unjust and to a major party
that has violated our law and women over and over. Some of these persons are
guilty. Nothing in our law says Susan Herbert alone may not address her
injuries or that Susan Herbert alone is exempt from our law. Nothing says that
I alone am to receive no protection of the law especially when innocent and
especially when the states refused to name anything I was guilty of yet kept
‘punishing’ me over and over by issuing false and unconstitutional decisions
and orders based upon no case law and which even violated the code of the
issuing state as well as US law. These decisions and orders then found me when
the law does not protect me thus I alone am subjected to the law when I alone
am not allowed to use the law as a weapon in my defense. If the law accords me
zero protection it then may not find me. Courts may not then begin
citing rule instead of law as an authority that finds me! That proves our
Constitution is no more!
27.
This court nor any court is to consider the consequences of adjudicating
a case or of awarding remedy and relief to a litigant, to a class of one or
millions, as it is impossible to predict the future exactly and as this then
makes the preservation, protection and defense of Declaration and Constitution
impossible. No woman can preserve, protect and defend her own life or the lives
of her children. Violence may erupt; riots may ensue. This is the case of the
aftermath of Brown V Topeka. Federal precedent is: At times blood must
be shed in order to water the tree known as liberty. While the ideal is we have
orderly transfers of power some citizens refuse to own knowledge and so choose
ignorance when ignorance is not a reason or an excuse. To cite possible – possible – consequences in the cases of women only or in the
case of invalidating the election of a person who is black to the Office of
President is then to break the law, discriminate, harm the injured class or
lone person worse and to participate in what is now a criminal act as it is
treason as it is the overthrow of our law. Black or color is inconsequential;
woman or gender is not.
28.
I overcome all prior decisions against a private citizen suing to remove a
candidate from the ballot or to be placed on the ballot; I will win on merit
and airtight reasoning. First, I am the acting, legal president. Am I even
private then as I volunteered? Second, I stood down all of Congress, as it is
unchecked thus no statutory method exists in actuality but only upon paper.
Congress is mostly male and mostly Democratic; this court cannot overlook this
nor the gross violation of separation of power nor the cause as
unconstitutional term limits have become repugnant and so they are string
theory as they change numbers that should never have been changed and skew
power in favor of Congress. We then have no way to check Congress or any branch
as that is our vote and it is negated by decisions of this court and by
Congress itself. I wrote to all 100 senators and to dozens and dozens of Reps,
some more than once. All failed me and all denied reality. As I named the Chief
Justice John Roberts exactly a suit in International Human Rights Court not
only removes the seat of power from the US but also then would name these
people exactly for engaging in what is human trafficking under the guise of
family court orders and federal court orders none of which are supported by the
evidence or by our two governing documents. It would find John Roberts and this
entire nation guilty of becoming human traffickers and pimps; of becoming child
abusers and wife beaters for profit.
29.
New injury has occurred as a direct result of all of this most especially the
Supreme Court’s failure to hear me in person: I have now had a visit from the
US Secret Service who announced that they had no rational basis for visiting me
and were not at my home to detain or arrest me or even question me. They asked
if they could come in and I said YES fully knowing the law and the plain sight
rule. Incredibly, this occurred upon December 5th, the very day the
Supreme Court was conferencing my case. An interesting conversation then
ensued, I refused to consent to a search legally reasoning that this was not
constitutional, necessary or rational as the only “concern” the Secret Service
had was a Notice of Suit against Obama and as they
refused to call my reference – John Roberts – or to look up the Court’s docket.
I reasoned if I did consent to a search then I lost my federal standing as I
would then be making the legal claim that the Secret Service is the authority
and not my person and/or that it has authority over me when it does not. To
even so much as question me re Obama as the President
first the Secret Service has to establish he has some basis in the Constitution
or his election is legal. They did not and could not.
30.
I was in legal limbo due to the failure of the Solicitor General thus the US at
the time of this election and as lower courts began to cite or blame the
Supreme Court within their rulings for their dismissal and denial of good cases
and all fact and law as if they too need not name any actual reason. The
election results are then invalidated. Interestingly, created or manmade
legal limbo was one of my very first claims in federal court that was then
denied and cited as being frivolous and having no basis in fact or law. I do
not possess ESP; legal limbo existed for women, children, enlisted service
members, persons who are gay and I alone from a time before I entered the courts.
It did exist then and does exist now or else I already would have given oral
argument before this court. The US Supreme Court by denying me oral argument
and refusing to answer a single question then answered: The exactly named
Creator does not exist, Susan Herbert alone is the exception to the law, women
are not equal and so less than men and not of the Creator and Marbury does not apply to anyone not even this very
court so the Presidential election thus the office of the executive may be
purchased or stolen by snakes. It was. A woman’s only other recourse? Marry
into the possibility of becoming elected. This nation may not force me to marry
a man or have relations with snakes to then become the
elected President. This nati on may not reason if a
man cannot prove God exists than a woman cannot; that is like saying a man can
prove life – give childbirth – but a woman cannot. Proving the Creator is
actual reality or when life begins in the womb is easy for this woman due to
all the knowledge she spent her life collecting as science missed something
tiny and obvious. In fact it was easier than suing the Chief Justice of the
31.
An emergency application for a stay of enforcement of judgment was not treated
in a timely manner when it is a true emergency and enlisted service members,
women and children have died as a result. It was acted upon then held but not
filed and not returned thus I then sent a supporting petition to the court only
discovering today, December 2nd, that it was never filed and would
be returned as would my petition. This is yet one more example of how men are
granted what I am not. Bush Jr. received timely treatment in 2000 when he
applied for a stay but had no true emergency. He was not sent back to a lower
court to adjudicate the never heard issue. I did the exact same thing, EXACTLY
THE SAME, that he and his lawyers did but received
different treatment. Also Berg, a man, had an application for a stay filed. The
only difference is “woman” and “Susan”. I know a true emergency is a life or
death issue; does this Court and does the Chief Justice? as
Congress and the never legal Executive do not know what an actual emergency is
and abuse that word constantly in an attempt to instill unwarranted fear in the
citizens.
32.
No other litigant can meet the burden of proof you must meet to then make this
case yet at least one other litigant has been conferenced:
Philip Berg. A man pressing this case is then asking a political question but
seeking to adjudicate it as equal protection and due process issue or as an
authority case is something done one time only: Bush V Gore. All men
have unclean hands. None of these men acted as I did – from a time before this
election and before Bush V Gore. No man may ask this federal question
then as he cannot know woman or birth as fact and to ask it and not be
political you must be a member of the only class denied justice and denied
legal power since a time before our founding: Women or Susan alone. Further, to
prove material harm and injury one must first prove they have felt actual
liberty but then were denied it thus they actually suffered a denial of
liberty. To my knowledge I am the only living American who can and did
experience liberty as sacred i.e. as an actual emotion and physical sensation
and later did then feel liberty denied. I have read descriptions of liberty
denied by former slaves and by Patrick Henry and some civil rights marchers who
are black. Other litigants have not felt this nor adequately or at all described
this. The last two burdens a person must meet to then make this case? The
person must possess the case for equal rights as I do as evidenced by the
federal questions US Supreme Court has refused to consider at least two of
which were then certified when litigants after me then asked them thus
it is discrimination of me and: the litigant must meet proof of death
both ways, physically and metaphysically, but then have survived to be able to
give living testimony as SCOTUS began requiring proof of death in the cases of
We The People, most especially if the person is female. I managed to meet that
standard. Not one other American in all of history has done what I have done by
surviving both then acting pro se thus all others bringing suit fall short. I
am the lone litigant with absolute and pure standing.
33.
I possess no evidence that Barack Obama
is a natural born American, as the only certificate I have seen is not a birth
certificate but a registration of birth certificate, which any person can and
may get. All this certificate does is certify that you
were born and your live birth was registered in that place in that state but
does not certify that you were actually born in the
34.
Marbury clearly states that: There are three ways a
case can be heard in the Supreme Court: (1) filing directly in the Supreme
Court; (2) filing in a lower federal court, such as a district court, and
appealing all the way up to the Supreme Court; (3) filing in a state court,
appealing all the way up through the state’s highest courts, and then appealing
to the Supreme Court on an issue of federal law. The first is an exercise of
the Court’s original jurisdiction; the second and third are exercises of the
Supreme Court’s appellate jurisdiction. The clerks have now referred to what is
a case of original jurisdiction as a case of a Writ of Cert when it is no such
thing as a case may be wholly original or enter here firstly as I did; that is,
I never had to ask for any lower court opinion but SCOTUS forced me to do so
when I had already proven the law had been overthrown or direct entry would not
have been possible and when we all know Bush V Gore happened as did the
election of Obama! I as the authority do not
need to ask for any Writ as what we are now adjudicating is: Is this a case
only SCOTUS could ever adjudicate thus no matter how many lower courts
plaintiff has been in is she an original case that enters here thus a decision
is rendered at last upon the named claims in light of actual fact and law for
the very first time and not upon what lower judges made up or are denying?
Literally, SCOTUS is hearing and deciding this case as no lower court ever once
allowed me entry on paper or in person as they wholly denied what I wrote or
said thus all prior rulings going back for more than ten years are no good and
do not even stand as legal or actual as they adjudicate what was never claimed,
what is perjured thus is a lie and what was not even said in a court of law!
They finally resorted to pulling documents thus negating my appearance. I do
not know how to state this for you so you will understand: All any lower court
judge did was resort to what are named crimes to then avoid this case thus they
then opened up LIABILITY as all involved in my case acted with full knowing so
with deliberation. If SCOTUS will not allow me entry unless I ask for a Writ of
Cert I will but it is senseless and devoid of logic or reasoning in this case; did
Marbury have to ask for a Writ of Certiorari? NO AS
THAT IS HOW WE ESTABLISHED O.J.!!! Marshall said MEN could not ask for Mandamus
against those acting under the authority of the US – YES as men voted then thus
lent the sitting officers their conscious awareness of their knowledge of the
law or authority under the US; my claim has always been I’m a woman
and those I named are not acting under the authority if the US aka the Constitution as authored by our Founders and the
Solicitor General then proved it for me by defaulting thus I, Susan, always
could ask for mandamus unlike other litigants. Another reason is LAWYERS may
not ask for mandamus as the fact they are lawyers means the legal assumption is
that lawyer, even though he or she is representing a client, is asking as the
lawyer truly believes the judge or court has the authority of the US or else he
would not be in this court asking, would he? As lawyers the assumption is they
are all acting under or according to the law, the
35.
As for litigants that came before this court after Bush
v Gore and after Roberts appointment? They had an opportunity, didn’t they?
Our law is what you knew, when you knew it and when you acted upon it. If you
truly believed these people had power and authority over you than they did as
you created that belief ‑ a mistaken belief‑ and then made it real
by acting upon it. Those litigants do not get to return and argue the same
points of law; they do not get to turn back the clock, as they did not argue
what I am arguing when they could and should have done so. If
they actually disagreed and felt as if they were denied justice? They
had the opportunity to disobey and/or act against the decision they received as
I myself went to these very people. They declined that opportunity. John
Roberts is not their problem or their point of law – they themselves are their
own legal issue, as those very litigants are the federal question and are the
constitutional authority case now known as Susan V Obama
and the US. A person only controls you if you allow it as you have to first
give your power and authority away. WHO told you that you could not reason and
apply law your own self or that a Justice could count but you could not? Our
law exactly states you need to be 18 and human to enter a contract aka reason and apply the law to yourself. WHO told you that
you could not? As if you lacked the human ability or that I lacked it? That it
was impossible to disobey? All you have to do is serve those acting
with notice thus all you have to do is get within US Supreme Court ‑ on
the docket ‑ as it is then informed consent; you petitioned for redress
and so now anything goes if you are failed. WHO told you that you cannot mail
in a petition thus issue an executive order like anybody else as your one vote
is the power of executive order? Our law exactly states that you must be 35,
human and natural born. “Law school” is nowhere in sight as law school did not
even exist as we know it when this was written and as the entire point of this
nation is self-actualization aka rising in spite of
the odds set against you. The citizens had access to a free public education
and the free public library just as I did. If public school fails you the
library has volunteers that will teach you how to read so you can then defend
yourself aka act pro se. I went to school for over
thirty years to reason it is a denial of liberty rights all protected and fully
vested but unclaimed as any person can and may go to school from the cradle to
the grave in America – for little or no actual monetary cost – and as every
American citizen is then a lawyer as that is the very nature of American
citizenship. You are born into the contract or later volunteer to then
enter the contract thus you are a lawyer. Law school commences
the day you hit the bricks; it is entirely up to you if you graduate and then
enter the bar. WHO told you that you need a dead piece of paper known
as a diploma or license or else you do not know what you know??? What you
lived??? What you see, feel and hear??? Claim the vote for yourselves and there
is no going back but only forward. Once I knew as fact all American missed the
event horizon, the vote, as they are it so could not know it I then knew I had
to overturn Bush v Gore as it is not possible to survive a black hole
unless you are equal and due first and that was the cause of my legal
nightmare. You are reconstituted upon exiting on the other side. In this case? We will be the first and only great government
to survive our own success as success unchecked can become a black hole as you
begin to forget who and what you are. We will be reconstituted as equal and due
on the inside by correcting a mistaken belief about women and ourselves as
Americans. As for Congress? They can and should send
away to the
36.
The only thing that ever makes anyone whole is the truth. I need to be able to
tell my truth and I need to know what Obama’s truth
is. This nation needs to know the truth of my life, the recent election and Bush
V Gore so they can then reason what they did – the how and why – so as to
avoid it ever happening again. Justice is about the truth and learning to live
truthfully no matter what that is for you alone and then we as a nation. When
you avoid the truth? You never know if you are then denying yourself good
consequences. You are. You deny yourself the Constitution thus you deny
yourself you.
37.
It is unconstitutional and not effective or practical to let the inmates run
the asylum, as at some point asylum will no longer exist. Actual reality is no
liberty, no justice and so no
38.
As it is too long to include here see the legal history and bad math
is included as Appendix This details how
we came to be here and why our
39.
The order from the Federal
40.
This order is an example of a judge making law as there is no basis in the
Constitution or in any SCOTUS ruling which supports this judges
action. As I said he violates the law and at least one SCOTUS ruling. So he
makes what is being levied against me as if it is law –
he makes law as even the rule he cites is not applicable to my person – and
then enforces it by instructing the clerk to do so, to enforce his ruling
by pulling the motion from the files. Thus he is making law, interpreting
it himself as he answered to no one not even the paper Constitution and then he
enforced it. I have been claiming from day one: Crimes are now legally enforced
or made legal when they are not! Exactly as the kidnapping of my children was
legally enforced or made legal. This judge acted to keep the knowledge within
my motion from the living Constitution, The People. Thus he truly believes HE
empowers The People and he truly believes he then has the right to deny The
People authority and power or else he would not have to resort to enforcing his
own ruling, would he? Why not let The People govern themselves upon being
informed? Why usurp SCOTUS’ constitutional authority? I know why: As
the judges on this bench would be some of the first officers I win a liability
claim against and that The People roust from office! Proof of a gross violation
of separation of power, of consolidation of power by lawyers and/or those
already entrenched, endemic corruption and/or treason aka
overthrow. They are all equivalent as it is actually endemic. The People
cannot enforce the Constitution if living ethical or law abiding persons are
denied access to the system and now all lawyers are dead institutions as they
are arguing a paper constitution our original Founders did not author. The
People must be granted this Writ so that access then exists and The People, one
of which I am, are then able to address the violation of separation of power
that caused this: The vote.
41.
As other judges have begun blaming SCOTUS exactly for their actions? So have
members of Congress only Congress has gone one further: Granting constitutional
authority to make believe, fantasy officers. They are also stating as fact that
they know what is said when SCOTUS meets to discuss cases as in how they voted.
Also if you merely lived here for 14 years you are natural born. YES, if
you lived here in 1763 or 1777 as you left off at the time the Constitution was
adopted. That would make you natural born as you were actually
present when the actual Constitution both paper and People was
actually naturally born, when it sprang from the minds of our Founders one of
which you then are: Thus you are natural born. From a letter authored
by Anders Crenshaw, my Rep, in response to why he is not addressing Obama and why he did not address the candidates on
the ballot: “According to Article II of the Constitution, the eligibility
requirements for the Office of the President include: 1) natural born
citizenship; 2) 35 years of age, and 3) 14 years of residency in the United
States. Concerned citizens have questioned
whether President-elect Obama meets these minimum
qualifications,
and some have brought legal challenges attempting to prevent him from assuming
the office based on his place of birth. However, these legal challenges to
the President’s citizenship have been dismissed in several states, and
the Supreme Court overwhelmingly decided that it would not
issue a writ of certiorari to hear an appeal of each dismissal. In
addition,
42.
I practice or live what I teach, US law: As further proof we
are no longer a Constitutional Republic and are paying what is tribute Obama is now acting to investigate the CIA as he said his
administration would be the most transparent but then he promptly acted to hide
his facts by hiding his paper thus everyone but Obama
is being made transparent or is subject to Obama’s
arbitrary enforcement of the law. He is violating the
equal protection clauses as if SCOTUS, the CIA and Susan must obey the letter
and the spirit of the law so must he but he does not. He is arbitrarily picking
and choosing what he will live out and what he will enforce. Proof is he first
said he would not investigate the activities of the CIA but then acted to do
it. That then is arbitrary, it is conditional, and as
no other condition changed Obama then is the
condition that changes and there is nothing lawful or equal and due about it. Obama changed his mind and upon what only he knows as our
Constitution did not change nor did new case law arise nor do we have a new CIA
director since he installed himself as the Executive and appointed one. The
chief law enforcement officer enforces the law, period. He applies it
to everyone including himself. Ideally he never violates it. But Obama has not once lived up to the letter or the spirit of
our Constitution or so I truly believe and he falsely claims that he is an
innocent victim of crime. Thus: I never need to see a single paper to then
prove Obama is not the acting, legal constitutionally
named or set President and Commander as I have what our Founders gave me: life.
Plus the paper trail exists and I already entered it as Obama
and CORP
43.
SCOTUS need not serve the
44.
I truly believe the People acted as they did and so cast what is not a legal
vote as they have zero conscious awareness of what our law is and says and what the clauses “natural birth” and “equal
protection” actually mean. The People do not know how powerful their lone vote
actually is as they have never had an opportunity to wield it in such a way
they exert actual energy, thus convert matter –
The Constitution – into energy – liberty and justice. They not once experienced
an institution being converted into a constitution or witnessed a living
constitution become a living institution. They have no idea our law provides
for everlasting life if only you claim it as
45.
There is only two ways justice can be restored. This is science – physics and government – and not a matter of my
personal belief: What must occur is a violent uprising of The People or a
citizen – me – must be heard in person before SCOTUS. No other means exist. I
myself am all for a violent uprising save one thing: Our law is we are not to
be needing violent uprisings as we have orderly
transfers of power. YES, via the orderly transfer of knowledge! Via informed
consent! If the process exists. It does. No
more people need to be injured; we must also end something else that is now
afoot: Americans are now referring to other Americans as the “enemy” using that
word exactly and are actively turning each other in to the entrenched
‘authorities’ and to quasi-authorities, political groups. Instead of targeting
the actual cause, LAWYERS and PRIVATEERS, they are senselessly targeting each
other. We’re all supposed to be on the same side. That gives you a whole lot of
room to then express yourself. We can all join forces behind this case, in
defense of the Constitution. It’s not possible to ‘lose’ then no matter the ruling.
Grant this Writ to avoid a violent faction as Federalist 10 instructs.
46.
You are never to take the law into your own hands but the Founders said you
most definitely are to take the government into your own hands, as you are
the government. Grant this Writ so I can then teach The People that taking the
law into your hands makes you a victimizer or worse a criminal exactly like
those who injured you; taking the government into your own hands makes you a
victim who has triumphed over your oppressors the lesson being: In America
there is no such thing as an actual victim only a legal one. “Victim” is a
legal designation; it is not reality until or unless you begin to truly believe
you are one. If SCOTUS fails you and The People? Take
government into your own hands: Declare yourself Chief Justice, post
public notice of your appointment and confirmation and name a place where The
People can access you and so the court. Trust me as you can: If a plaintiff
sues me but goes to your court, you, and not the other SCOTUS headed by
Roberts? As long as you establish you were denied justice by the other SCOTUS
I’ll argue my defense in front of you. That’s how you take government into your
own hands: you empower yourself first by making the reasoned decision basing it
upon the constitution and US case law and then act upon it by doing something,
you take action, and so you then lend that power via conscious awareness to
another. If you act to post notice of you having become the
Chief Justice? When I read it I am consciously aware we may have a new
Chief Justice thus I then have the human ability to go to you and find out for
myself. I can and may enter a petition to you as I have one criteria
at this point: I know you’re constitutional if you have a gun as you have
proven you have the means to enforce your own rulings. You thus we can and may
execute chain of command theory. Ideally you won’t need a gun for long. Even
more ideally once everyone is aware that they own all actual power upon reading
this very petition the crooks will start volunteering to leave as SCOTUS
recently ruled for us albeit roundaboutly: Guns, guns
and more guns. US case law now is we can and may not only shoot in theory post
the fact of the Revolution but we may first own the necessary constitutional
element: A gun, and even if you live right next door to Congress. SCOTUS ruled
against the Executive, Judiciary and Congress and for The People. Buying a gun
is taking government into your own hands; shooting it before I am heard
in person in SCOTUS? Before I issue the order? Before you own the
knowledge it is now necessary to shoot? That is taking law into your own hands.
This is why McVeigh, Nichols and all like them are criminals not patriots: none
of them accessed SCOTUS. The People need to learn the difference as
“government” and “law” are not the same things and if The People confuse them
then they have confused perceived power for actual power.
47.
Grant this Writ so NY and the other states may no longer use federal ‘authorities’
who aren’t as they are no longer acting under the authority of the US as of
default on 11/20/08 to then harass the citizens. I served four judges in NY
with notice of suit and once again the
48.
Grant this Writ as I can and will then teach other citizens how to use the
Declaration as an idealized compass and the Constitution as an idealized
straight edge so they too can then square the circle as I did. There’s a sacred
experience to be had other than liberty. As I discovered it I named it “
49.
What’s more important that restoring the Constitution thus the original government
named and set by the Constitution, We The People?
What’s more important than preserving our law and our vote thus preserving
liberty? Sometimes you want and need to reform old guards for your present
safety and it is not possible to be a living government without living People
who come to feel actual liberty as that is the fabric of our Constitutional
Republic as humans unlike any other animal possess emotional reasoning capacity
and the Americans are the people who then legislated this. Upon my entry to
SCOTUS to argue in person we have at long last severed any remaining ties we
have to Britain or any other European nation both legally and financially as
they go hand and hand and as I, Susan, prove Marbury
is law and is uniquely our own thus the body of case law we have established
over the last 200 years then becomes American common law as our form of
government is directly based upon the Iroquois Confederacy and the idea of
participatory democracy via Franklin’s Albany Plan of Union and our contact with
American Indians and only indirectly based upon the Magna Carta
and British common law. The Americans become the first people to make it back
to the original bar upon restoration of our named original jurisdiction
government, We The People, as that is how we came into
being, as one. Every American begins at the same starting line, as America is
the place the races united after their long journey across Earth first
physically with the completion of the transcontinental railroad in Utah and
then spiritually via our law, Marbury and
SCOTUS. Americans become the people who perfected themselves in the image of
their Creator, as just, and who are actually endowed in all ways possible with
inalienable rights born of that Creator. We become sovereign and so beholden to
no other nation or law but only our very own unique law. We finally realize
what the Founders committed to paper so long ago. We become the proof they said
would someday exist, the people who prove that man can govern his own person.
It is the rebirth of liberty and an expansion of our conscious awareness as I
acted only upon my ownership of knowledge and my own will and liberty; I needed
no outside thing. It will serve to be the beginning of a chain of causation
that will eventually liberate the planet as hundreds and thousands of years
from now other nations will cite America, the Confederacy, the Constitution and
Susan V Obama, Roberts and the US as the seeds that
planted their own just government and law. We, The People via our own hard work
and perseverance in the face of astronomical odds and in spite of a doubting
world have finally slayed the dragon known as
feudalism, slavery, royalty and religious intolerance. We have finally lived up
to the good idea we have had of our own selves since
50.
Federal income taxes: Grant this Writ so they are then
made just as even if we turn tribute back into just taxes how taxes
are currently levied is not constitutional, as our founders never intended
People or a right to be taxed and as today the burden is placed almost
exclusively on the middle income classes. The poorest and wealthiest people
do not pay taxes. Upper income classes do not pay anything close to their
fair share. Harlan was correct in Pollack but he missed something. We are
supposed to develop the means or the reasoning. For instance
if SCOTUS rules the current income tax is not constitutional? The
government or The People are then to develop a plan that is legal. We still
have to run this thing…Grant this Writ so I can toss this idea into the ring:
Income from property and/or stock is not a burden, at least not all of
it. Stick with me: I own a rental property. Any income derived from rent
was not earned DIRECTLY by the sweat of my brow. The renters DIRECTLY earned it
and then I INDIRECTLY ‘earned’ it as profit. I subtract my salary as property
manager, my employees salaries and expenses for
maintenance then the rest is taxed. Salaries and expenses are not taxable;
anything else is. Stock? The GE employees directly
earn or cause profit; I indirectly earn it via stock ownership. I might only
own a few shares thus it is all taxed but it should be as I’m not expending any
sweat to then take in the profit. A guy who owns millions of shares? He’s using
stock brokers and secretaries and money managers. He should be able to subtract
their salaries as they do burden it.. And if I know
whatever I pay my employees is not going to the fed? I’m going to pay them more only to keep it from the fed. I’ll be overly
generous, lol, as I want The People to have the power
not the federal institutions. In 1913 or 1916 we may not have had any means to
keep track of who owns what and who is claiming what but today technology makes
tax levied this way feasible as we can account for it. The
problem before was tracking the money and then apportioning it as indirect
taxes are apportioned geographically. We had no way to apportion it.
Today we do. We now have the Social Security index too and that did not exist
then. Besides, it is up to The People to make their fellow citizens account for
their actions. The People are not to be depending upon the IRS to baby-sit the
wealthy. If I say I am worth ten billion it might be true, maybe I can prove
it, but if Oprah Winfrey says she is worth ten billion we know it is not the
truth as she only takes in so much as does not generate anything close to ten
billion dollars. The IRS should want to get an up close and personal look at a
person claiming they are worth ten billion dollars or worth more than they
are taking in. I truly believe we can revisit the federal income tax.
Also: This then frees up a whole lot of money. Money is a symbol; money
represents the energy The People expend. There’s only so much energy in the