Remedy And Relief

Remedy And Relief

Remedy and Relief
The remedy and relief I seek is: Injunctive and Declarative. An injunction against Obama preventing him from acting as if he is the legal President as I can and will perform those duties immediately as even if he is natural born he then bought this office and preventing all states from acting upon policies which deny women and children full protection and process of the law or which violate state code and exactly naming NY, PA and FL and; an injunction against the states preventing abortions upon demand after 28 days post the act of sex as I have proven with hardcore science and proof of life that the right comes into being at this time or that a fetus is a person at this time who can feel emotion, feel pain and hear and preventing the state from awarding custody of children to fathers as a protected right as for a father that interest and that right never fully vests unless he is or was a member of the military and saw action thus it is a privilege and; an injunction against the third parties, the Austin’s, and the state of NY which stops any and all action against me in the state of NY and recognizes that as of 11/20/08 all orders against me are invalidated as they are wholly unconstitutional and are based upon zero evidence as the Austin’s entered none and cited no case law but only upon hearsay and perjured testimony thus they must return my children to my person immediately no matter the monetary cost and; a declaration that I became the legal President and Commander upon June 5th, 2007 and that this was at last recognized by a federal court on 11/20/08 as SCOTUS acted to directly enter my case upon this claim and that; women are persons and equal to men as human beings with fully protected rights under our law or that actual civil rights are human rights not men’s rights and women’s rights as you would not know men believe women or children to be human  based upon the state of our nation. I became the legal President and Commander as unlike William Marbury I acted ex post facto to then claim my commission:

 I followed through and I acted after the fact of leaving SCOTUS to then claim my award; I told Linda Griffin to her face in open court that I was not now and would never would be sorry for defending myself or the Declaration and Constitution and that her actions were and are criminal; I clearly stated for the record that she was acting against the legal President and Commander, the constitutional authority, and this is a fact of history whether she ever comes to personally believe the SCOTUS docket or not as our history and our law is not a matter of her personal belief. I also clearly stated the smallest and largest change of circumstances which she then ignored: My children suffered little material harm until she awarded them to the Austin’s and did so only by denying every single solitary piece of proof I entered including what she her own self saw in her own courtroom: my physical scars. By retiring early upon notice that I entered SCOTUS directly less than one month later as this federal action was already in progress at the time of the Austin’s filing in NY and when before her and she knew this she then proved my claim for me as her actions are the proof beyond any reasonable doubt. Her words in her newest decision and order seal her fate, as she is no victim aka passive participant anymore than Barack Obama is passive or is a victim.

 The election is invalidated. It is no good. You can and may deny the proof aka deny actual reality but your denial in no way makes it not reality or makes this invalidated election that was purchased, my right of custody and all my rights now violated, the discrimination of women and now the discrimination of the ethical, the hostility and even hatred of the federal bench towards pro se litigants or abortion after 28 days post the act of sex then being murder if you know then go away as if by magic. I have proven: Legal power is nonexistent for women, the federal courts are now closed to living people with pure cases (a case re justice not money) and SCOTUS is not now real or actual for any woman nor any person at all unless they are wealthy or are a licensed lawyer. Men and licensed lawyers, some of whom are unjust, can and may and do purchase legal power thus usurping our moral authority and until or unless a woman defends herself and/or a unanimous decision is issued for women in which it is proved via hardcore science that women are indeed the equals of men then men will yet defy our law and this government will yet murder innocent women and children. It is not my problem or any women’s problem if men are humiliated and mortified that they did not know Bush V Gore for what it is or that if upon my person informing them they were then too afraid to act upon the knowledge. Federal judges are only stunned by my claim as I am reasoning that I am the acting, legal President rather than reasoning some other person should be as men do. If I reasoned Obama is not legal and then propped up another person not myself in his stead you’d accept that; you just can’t have a confident and capable woman acting as she does not need the counsel of men or of criminals be they male or female.  That is what you fight so hard against: A woman who is able and capable thus confident. I and all women and then all ethical persons are not to be faulted if Barack Obama, his lawyers and other unjust persons do not want anyone to know that they openly and directly violated our law and did so by engaging in ideological warfare and by manipulating the public’s emotions thus manipulating or violating our law until it is unrecognizable and even nonexistent; that they targeted able and capable women. 

 I’d injunct Congress and declare it void but we’d be here three or four months or more. I’d injunct the federal court but that seems pointless. I can and will check both of these branches and this very suit is then me checking the federal court.  Then;

 An apology from John Roberts and the clerks and an acknowledgement that I did enter US Supreme Court directly (some clerks know but some do not; I have no idea if the Justices know); an appearance in person in US Supreme Court; this court or the Supreme Court finally defining itself and its power as a legal institution of government responsible for refereeing the Constitution as all courts are to be courts of constitutional authority as is the lone citizen and the people are the court of actual last resort and as the people, by casting a legal, valid and binding vote in accordance with our law and its spirit then agree to this as the Chief Justice and President are equivalent legal authorities; the Supreme Court must remove from its website the statement that no person may enter the Supreme Court as a matter of right as I tested this policy or rule and found it to be not only unconstitutional but false and as it then removes the Court from the our right to access the courts plus grants blanket immunity to the acting President, Justices and clerks even for crimes personal in nature; the Supreme Court must fine tune its unjust policy that no person can enter directly at all to then become no person may enter directly unless that person is suing one of the Justices or the clerks personally and because of an act related to official court business which violates US law and can support it with evidence rising to proof, or unless that person meets the highest, strictest standard of all, pro se constitutional authority, and this has happened only once in US history after the creation of the court as this litigant discovered the policy was and is unconstitutional but that it then was not actually unjust for her person but unfair as she overcame it and used it to her advantage, that is, a policy like this one may exist and may seem to be unjust but may be extra-constitutional and/or partly constitutional and so it is in the eye of the beholder as the victim/plaintiff is then forced to become the appellant/attorney and then the petitioner/human via addressing the policy or not so the Supreme Court can and may have policy like this one as long as it is openly advertised thus is then overcomeable as secrecy made this policy unconstitutional; the Supreme Court must make a greater effort to hire more women especially as clerks; custody of my children returned to me via the overturning of all lower state court rulings in my case as all are unconstitutional and false; the acknowledgement that almost every piece of paper in existence concerning my person including the above judgments, some legal arguments, medical records and police reports is false due to patriarchy and discrimination as my word or sworn testimony was never accepted as fact but changed to conform to societal standards and the mores of the reporter some of which are not actual reality but are only personal unsupported beliefs; the recent election overturned in my favor and a runoff election held once I inform the citizens and Congress of the law and of the effects of Bush V Gore plus what Bush V Gore is and says so that just, safe candidates are upon the ballot (I will sit and act as the authority until this election is held perhaps this upcoming November as we can then return to the regular Presidential election cycle); my name upon the ballot and in the top slot in all 50 states from among those safe choices when this election is held and monetary damages which all involved should volunteer to pay, including those not named in my caption as that was made impossible for me to do.  When I did name them all in 2007 federal judges refused to believe my sworn statement.

 A new election while I sit and act as the authority is a price that men most of whom are guilty and all of whom have unclean hands can afford to pay in order to accord women and children justice. No actual price is too high a price to pay for what is actual liberty and is actual justice. A new election also re-checks all offices up to the office of Chief Justice and then the office of the President – if that elected person does not violate the terms to then become elected, as it is not possible to be constitutional if you are in violation of the law upon entrance to this office! This relief can be granted and should be granted or else we are as we have become something other than constitutional. To prevent a nasty lawyer trick: Each asked for award is to be addressed separately so do not write that ALL of my remedy and relief is being denied based upon one thing only as I know men will be furious when they read NEW ELECTION as they threw bad money after bad money and are desperate to hold onto perceived power at any cost. This nasty lawyer trick was already used against me as a federal judge reasoned, decided and then ordered that he could tell me what would or would not make me whole. That’s my decision not the court’s. I may not ask for remedy and relief that is impossible to grant or that is injurious as in the equities do not favor it. “Equities” are not  “possible consequences” that may never come to pass which is why the court is never to consider the possible consequences of justice, as fear and/or self-doubt may prevent actual liberty and justice from ever being realized. I not once asked but made demands; politeness when out the window once federal judges acted to injure me with deliberation and knowing. I’m seeking to remedy the actual injury not make it worse by pretending it cannot be done or by ignoring it or by lying and saying anyone, even a woman, can become President but then when they do reveal my actual truth by changing the terms or by denying that it, that person and/or the law, exists. We recall other politicians like a CA governor to then favor a foreigner who is a man so why not recall a President or null and void his election in favor of humanity as that is equal and due and is US law?

 It would not be justice to install me as the President for an entire term without a new vote as each citizen must recheck and rebalance their own persons thus reclaim constitutional authority. A new election in which people write the name of the candidate in the blank space reserved for such an emergency from among some just named choices is the only way as a citizen must connect their vote with reality as in their vote causes or cures injustice; that not only must they vote but that they must reason that action. I submitted a plan to the federal court; merely cross out Bush’s name and add just choices after I am heard. Article II allows Congress to address the candidates upon the ballot and there exists the means to do so. It will not cost too much money. Does our money even have value today? No. Can you ever reason justice has an actual price? No. This nation went down that road and it got us nowhere. It’s why our money lost all value. To me $5.3 billion is dirt cheap. That’s all you value yourself at? I truly believed $27 million was a fire sale when I asked for it in protest and $5.3 billion would be as well. How much do you value the truth? What could I charge for the Resolution to Uniformity and Proof of God? How much is the mystery of living things – life itself bestowed in the womb – worth? How much is your single life worth? I had to answer that question once and I reasoned one life was worth all of humanity combined so I would trade my own life not for that one exact life but for all of humanity.  You told me that you value all of creation including Earth, the moon and the other stars at $5.3 billion dollars as the US actually carries creation on her back as the entire world resides here as does almost all of its knowledge and our law is universal.  WHO  put this universe up for sale?

 I have been acting as President since June 5th, 2007 as I delivered my commission to a federal judge via 1st class US mail when it became an emergency thus I could no longer wait. Then I posted it upon the Supreme Court of the US’ docket and case conference list and later on the web so all had access to it. If it is claimed that they (voters) did not read it that is only because it is titled In Re Susan Herbert and does not have a man’s name, a famous name or a “versus Obama”  – yet, as I could not sue him before he won and before he acted but only as I did: as a member of Congress, a citizen and a candidate as it is treason. The citizens had no objection up to this point. I can continue to act for 30 or 60 days or even until this November while we hold a new election.

 Other remedy and relief some of which this court can award and some it cannot and/or may not award but other branches and/or the citizens can: I need and want a check for back pay with interest dated to June 5th of 2007. It needs to be made out to “The President and Commander in Chief of the US Susan Herbert”. I need to wise up and ask for back pay as a Justice dated to December of 2000 and/or early 2001 as that is when I began my tenure as a Justice by reasoning and deciding to take this on and entering it to a court of law, a Philadelphia court of law and then a NY court of law, so it is matter of the court record.  I could charge for my services dating back to age 5 or age 13 as those are the dates of the two most crucial decisions I ever made in my life unless you count my stealing chocolate pudding when I was 4 thus learning what ability versus capacity is and that I had both so that if I am going to do something then stand up and say I DID IT as either I do have reasoning that is legal or I do not and if I do not? Then do not do it but the earliest I owned this whole case is 1996. I was not 35 until 2002, December of 2002 after the election cycle of 2002 and after the Presidential election cycle of 2000 but I did place it upon the record in 2000. How could I know at 4 that my reasoning for stealing was so good that I created the court by creating the issue and the jurisdiction? That I outfoxed John Marshall, my mother, by not telling her, by claiming my award based upon my own reasoning against her NO vote and then eating my award before she could decide to take it back or decide not to award it a second time over? How could my mother know that the issue was not chocolate pudding, as all kids would steal that if given an opportunity but that it was FEAR OF THE UNKNOWN? In 1996 I knew this; I owned the knowledge: “At 4 I learned what others did not: Ability versus capacity. Will, as you should not fear what you do not yet know as life experience gives you the knowledge, or you should not be made to fear what you do know, the US Navy, thus I must know actual LIBERTY & JUSTICE while all of America does not. Aren’t the Congress and the US Navy supposed to be on my side??? Aren’t we rooting for the same exact thing, the Constitution??? Doesn’t FL, Congress or the Navy know this???” My mother answered my question; she said it’s the Navy but that she did not recognize the modern military so blame Congress and the Executive as that is all that changed. I thought YES as Vietnam is their fault; not the war but the loss.  If it were the war itself or the military then Vietnam would not be green today and we would have won as ten years is will in spades thus it is the other branches abusing the process and breaking the law; it is a Commander making decisions via a committee not as a Commander and is a President who is afraid of law makers.  The domino effect is real only it is about injustice masquerading as various forms of just government as money is a smokescreen as Congress truly believes it controls us with money and China truly believes material goods make or break a “constitutional nation” when they do not. Now Americans believe this! You can and may call it a Chinese constitution, a European union or a federal budget; is it actually constitutional? Just? Elegant? No. Money is the opiate of the people. Fear is the people’s motivation. I have to resolve that.  I need other parents to teach their children this same thing regarding ability, capacity, fear and will as now I am banging into and being harmed by all those kids now adults who never learned this. I need the military to know that I resolved their problem: What would you say if the state or existence of the military was not dependent upon money or fear? If you knew I could pull the rug out from under China’s feet with the truth about their entire power base which is fear based thus it is not reality as in not possible according to the laws that rule this universe? That I can use math and science to prove it is not possible and support it with empirical data that you can measure? That Hiroshima and Nagasaki make it seem as if it is possible when it is not? That nobody else considered one thing that I knew to consider and so factor in? I’d say: no power for China. Then I’d say: no fear based war in Iraq because of China’s massive consumption of oil but instead a resolution as I took care of an alternative source of power as well. I need Americans to know: Some citizens have excellent ideas as I’ve been listening and thinking thus reasoning them. You’d be stunned at the treasures within patent offices across the planet. If you know the science you can then chase an idea most of which have been realized as patents. Our intellectual property law is not the same thus that property often remains in foreign offices even if it is not on file here anymore for whatever reason. If you tell me we are fighting a war over religious based terrorism but I know as fact it is over China and oil then I’m going to conduct the experiment: I’m going to sell my car as at the least that will keep me chained to a desk or a computer thus forcing me to work on my case and at the most I’ll discover the truth; I’ll know if making yourself valuable to the enemy, your own nation, is a rule or a law.  Thus: I need to tell Americans that the rule is you make yourself valuable to the enemy if it is another nation but if it is your own nation you must make yourself extremely valuable thus the law is it, the value you must meet or exceed, is directly proportional to the existing and perceived but not actual fear based threat. So then: I need a new bicycle, preferably a beach cruiser that is bright orange as I learned more than I ever thought I would like cars make you less self aware and isolate you masking actual reality and this car thing is mostly about the crooked credit card industry which is just as deadly as banks as compared to standing unjust and unethical armies as it is one and the same industry.

I need to travel to the top of the Statue of Liberty  – to the torch – as it was closed when I was in NYC; I need a ride in a Navy jet – the type that travels straight up and down like it is gunning for the water; to take off and land upon an aircraft carrier and; to visit Monticello  – alone, when it is closed to the public. I need to return something I borrowed from the Sioux and; to travel to CA, Alaska and Hawaii. I need a passport and new driver’s license. I need to travel through the Panama Canal. I need to tell two Secret Service agents who met me in person that they protected the wrong President, a guy who is not, and after I quoted the law to them too and after they saw my red hair and my exact scars. I need Professor Gates to research my immediate family tree as almost all of that is lost to me save a few names that mean little or nothing. I need to go to those places to then know the truth. I need to return the sacred experience of Islam to Islam as they misplaced it. I need to visit St. John the Divine Cathedral in NYC as I left something there. I need to tell former Cardinal Ratzinger what John Paul II told me before he died, as I do not believe he told anyone else as it is about what I alone discovered re the church and this universe (the federal court would not know as fact what Popes I have or have not met and which ones sent me messages via a third party; when I state “extraordinary circumstances exist” I mean it as if there’s one thing Catholics can do it is reason law as the Catholic Church produces some of the most extraordinary legal arguments I’ve ever read only they call it doctrine). I need to visit Galapagos as we are Darwin’s finches thus I need to re-examine the evidence as it is one thing but it is not monkeys; humans as we exist today were never monkeys; once will and liberty enters the picture you are a new animal and so not that same creature you once were; monkey like but actual monkeys? NO, or so I believe there’s no monkey common ancestor. Monkey is relative not intrinsic; you can be related to monkeys but without ever actually having been one.  I need to pay two attorneys, as I owe them about $25k. I need to reveal what the seemingly embedded code of the universe is as it’s there and it’s embedded but it is not exactly a code, it’s anything but secret and only I have the ‘key’. I need to give Bruce Cathie the piece of the puzzle he does not have plus I need him to calculate something for me. I need to talk to Max Tegmark as he is closer than he thinks and he is driving me crazy as he is so close. Crazy we have in common as he too is called a “crackpot” as many scientists are. “Crackpot” unlike “frivolous” is a compliment in some circles. He and Neil Degrasse Tyson owe me an apology as well as it is not up to a physicist to reason the reality known as US law anymore than it is up to our federal courts to reason physics  – unless your case is faith and reason and unless you are a constitutional physicist and so far I’m it, the only one ever. I told them where to look, on the Supreme Court’s own docket as I had done the seemingly impossible; I smashed particles all by myself and before France! Guys, I stand out like a sore thumb so how could you miss that?! I thought it is self-evident but obviously it is not. There is only one force on the docket – me, as to be an actual power, actual energy, a newly defined force, you would have to act pro se and gain direct entry. You would have to know how to defy gravity. You would have to know how to travel in time and to pass through solid walls of stone. You would have to read minds. How did I get in and how was I acted upon if I never left FL? If I do not have a key? My name is there all by itself. It took more skill than buying postage and postage is a story in itself as stamp machines ‘magically’ give up stamps at no cost for me and they even read Liberty Forever…I did not know it is unique or newly defined. I assumed you already knew it but you didn’t. I’d name a famous string theorist but I do not know any. They all look alike to me.  This court forgets: Einstein, Edison, the Wright Brothers and Franklin did not have billion-dollar equipment so why does it believe that I need it to do what I did? That I needed school or a license? That only a whole university could do what I did? If your professors could not teach you then what could they teach me? The answer is not within a book or within a school. All schools of law failed as painful as that is to admit. No person had this answer which is why we call it unique intellectual property and why entering US Supreme Court is then a copyright or patent as only we produce federal court rulings in which the lone citizen triumphs over the powers that aren’t. It is also why lawyers resent me as I dispel the myth of necessity they have created. Like federal judges they are not used to being told their legal opinion is not wanted or needed. If the kidnappers would obey the law and my orders plus a Philadelphia court order I would not even be in court, as my children would have been returned ten years ago or never snatched to begin with. The opposing third parties need and want the federal court. My true belief is: I need this government to prosecute these persons to the fullest extent of the law as they volunteered to become the example.

Most discoveries happen outside of the lab – or outside of the courtroom – exactly like most sex happens outside of the bedroom and many happen as accidents by design, like the telephone or vulcanized rubber. Why is it that of all people ever ONLY “Susan Herbert” cannot make a discovery according to the federal court? The universe named me exactly as the three ships that sailed to Jamestown are: The Godspeed, The Discovery, and The Susan Constant. I traveled as fast as the speed of light squared. I squared the circle – Earth. I have a witness or two. Americans need to know: The speed of light and time is not constant. It can become constant but it is not always the same as the speed of light varies and the speed of time is relative. I even have an equation. Infinity? All time is actually no time as what’s one day compared to a billion as it is infinite? They don’t compare, as they are the same. All time now is the ‘absence’ of time. Time is not linear but geometric or dimensional. A clock on a wall, flat planes ‘moving’ from point to point, does not measure the actual reality of time. Clocks were invented by men to turn human beings, their work or energy, into dollars. We needed a means to measure it. So first we annihilated ancient concepts of time and then beat you over the head with the round, flat clock.  All of this is born into time; time is shaped like a spiraling strand of DNA; think of a slinky joined end to end. You travel within time but through space. Sort of sideways so that events seem to repeat themselves and complete themselves but it is infinite and you can do what I did rather quickly once you realize what is actually going on in the universe thus your world as YOU are nature and are light. Walking around the courthouse? Or your house? You are walking around space not through it, as ‘space’ is the stuff between the particles of light. The unified field, the human psyche and the God consciousness are three different things. There goes the space continuum. Don’t ‘believe’ me? Let me guess: If I ran out and got it published so then an ‘authority’ ordained it to be true and fact then you’d believe it. Who ordained Einstein? Madison? Nobody. Go read who publishes most of those so-called scientific journals or what ‘requirements’ you must meet. Truth isn’t one of them. Neither is fact. Hey! Just like court. For that matter: Maybe I do not know I need what I never had, a billion dollar lab. I’ll find out, as I’ll take the Jefferson Lab, as this nation has no idea what to do with it and a girl can always use an extra particle accelerator, as you never know what you might have to dissolve. I mean smash. [An aside: Jesus and Einstein? Lawyers.] I need Americans to know: Sea turtles and salmon make an amazing journey as they find their way back to the place they were born but humans make the most incredible journey of all as we are creatures of will and liberty thus we have to find our way back to a metaphysical place – without any assistance, without an actual map and without any tools other than our own selves. Nobody even so much as points you in the ‘right’ direction. It’s more difficult than anything a sea turtle does as not only is our brain most complex but due to that will and liberty? We operate on something other than instinct and making our own decisions means we come into conflict with the most dangerous predator or all: Other men. I know as I encountered that predator. Being one of the few humans who made it all the way home I can tell you: While it is worth every second of the struggle it does not have to be as deadly and as complicated as you are making it as the most lethal decision of all is made when you reason and decide I can’t and so then you can’t thus the attempt is never made or you act to foil another’s attempt as what you ‘can’t’ have is another person proving You can but will not. Humans are the highest form of evolution there is. It is closest to the God state. Human beings are the single most fascinating, interesting and talented creature of all; do you have any idea, any concept, of exactly how many skills you possess that you do not use based upon the lie that “It is impossible”? What is truly impossible? Knowing what is impossible, as we cannot define the impossible based upon it has not yet happened as it can, will and might. You can never know what is impossible but only possible, as someone does it thus proving: It can be done and so it is possible. You should see all of the seemingly impossible things I can do. While people are telling me it is impossible I am in the middle of actually doing it; they “can’t believe” their ears or eyes. Maybe they need an ear doctor or eye doctor or maybe…they’re wrong and you’re wrong. One of my problems in life was I had no idea other people heard the words “can” and “will” differently as nothing has ever been beyond my human ability so if you can? You will, it’s a given, or so I believed. Another person had to tell me that he heard those words differently as in ability he did not have versus permission. Do you know how much confusion this caused other people as they gave me grief for insisting they could? For truly believing or knowing as fact they could as ability or permission is a given as it is up to them alone?  How do you know you can’t author a petition heard in US Supreme Court if you never sat down and made the attempt? Lawyers kicked me out of their offices for saying this, for saying I believe you can! I believe in you! What, you want a client who doesn’t believe you know what you’re doing? Yes, as most of you are faking. It’s not as much pressure if your client does not know the law or bother to obey it. Those people need lawyers. It is like my friend Bruce says it is. His 90 year old parents died and he was not in a good place. I happened to ask him where he was going one day soon afterward. As he passed me he said, “To St. Luke’s.” Then he looked back and added, “To the church not the hospital.”  Yes, sometimes you need the church and other times you need the hospital. You never need lawyers. Check yourselves in America. Both are open 24 hours a day. As for any American who wishes to criticize me? You need to examine your own self and your sorry attempt, or your failure to act at all, as until you can say you too went all of the way?  Until you too exhaust your human resources? You will always compare yourself to me in your own head and feel resentful and less than. It’s you not me. You had better believe this is a trust issue, a public and personal trust issue. I do not trust you.

 Another thing I need to tell the citizens as they are supposed to be reading federal complaints but do not? Submitting yourself to the review of the people which is peer review is not evaluating any ruling in my case as in if you personally like it or if it is legal or not. You’re not an authority, are you? As I’m appearing and I’m arguing we know it is constitutional. Reviewing a Chief Justice and/or President is reviewing their qualifications and/or the performance of their duties. If you never had a problem with John Roberts, Samuel Alito or even George Bush Jr. that was so extraordinarily injurious that you sued before then you do not have standing to sue or rather to complain now. If they were fit and their qualifications never bothered you before what has changed? Nothing except you, as you have now discovered how badly you have behaved and how harmful your laziness and deliberate ignorance is as people have died and as you can never make up ten years in the case of my children, can you? How do you give back a person’s entire childhood? Or restore a life? You can’t. This is not about a ruling for or against my person; it is about justice. As justice is all that you can restore? You might want to consider reviewing your own selves at that church or at that hospital. Or an AA meeting as you’re all dry drunks addicted to the idea of money you have which is false and to junk, disposable junk. I’ll be perfectly fine regardless of any ruling for or against my person as long as I appear in person; the citizens refused to come to my aid when I needed it and when there was still time. I would not accept your ‘help’ now if you paid me to take it as YOU are the reason my children are dead and are no longer recognizable as the people I once knew and only the Creator knows how that is going to turn out. As it is now? I’m over that injury, as when the Creator adjudicated my case he found me not guilty and not even accountable or responsible. But he told me that I did everything a human being has to do save one thing and so I needed to do it. He said, “Susan, you need to experience the grief a human being feels over the death of a child. You need to feel the death of your children as you have not felt actual human grief over the loss of a child or a parent [and both your father and your sons died]. I know that you truly believe you felt actual grief but you have not. You need to feel grief. Are you willing?”  And that is how the Creator finally stopped the third parties from being able to scare me by threatening my children with deadly harm and so I entered the kingdom of God within as I answered YES, I AM. No fantastic visions, no booming voices, no flashes of lightning and no parting waters but only a sacred experience. If my kids got shot and killed or struck by a car and killed it would not matter. They were murdered a long time ago and I already dealt with it because even if every single living person on Earth abandoned me the Creator did not. If the Creator had not gotten me over this? I would not have survived as my son came to me and said he felt as if he was dying and asked why him. I had to talk to my son about death and will beyond the grave in a Kmart parking lot. I knew if I ever saw him again it would not be him; he would be dead. And I could do nothing because of a NY family court judge and satan-like third parties calling themselves saints when I knew: This kid is actually dying.  And he did. That kind of pain is not only emotional it is physical; it is so big and deep that you actually think the physical pain of it will kill you. No human being was ever going to get me through or over that but you never offered did you? For 8 years day after day after I had to live with people harming me and threatening to kill my children and watching it happen; it was actual torture, so much so I know what happens to a prisoner of war. I know exactly what you have to do to break someone as it was done to me and my children until finally the Creator directly intervened as even the Creator was offended at last. What thing do you have to give me that I would need to own? That is your entire problem, your actual legal issue: Justice is not a want it is a need. If you’re human. Oh yeah I forgot – you’re not, are you? And so you, the citizen, make no mistake: Turn the other cheek implies deliberation, as you actually have to reason it and then act. You have to overcome an emotional hurdle. Jesus never said stand still and let someone slug you; he got angry; he threw a punch or two. Jesus would be the first one to tell you that you are out of your gourd if you truly believe you can do whatever you want and make it all okay by saying, “I’m sorry.” The guy on the cross next to Jesus?  He was actually ignorant; until that very second he did not know. You? You knew. You know. Sorry does not cut it. And: You would not be qualified to know if I did or did not have an actual sacred experience; you would not be qualified to know if rights are inalienable as they are of the exactly named Creator as you never practiced it. If I discover a personal belief is not supported by the proof? I amend or lose that belief not the proof. I stop lying to myself. How could I ever know what would happen exactly when or if I died? I had no choice as murderers were not being stopped so my death was inevitable and I owned one piece of evidence rising to proof: My own father ‘died’ of a massive heart attack around age 40. For years he would not say what he experienced. Finally he told me: He willed himself back from the brink of…he was not sure of what only that he heard his name being called and knew it would be permanent if he went there. So he decided to ‘stop’ and ‘turn’ back. He gave me an idea: I can will death as easily as I will life; if I can avoid taxes than I can avoid death.  I met my Creator as I had a total absence of fear. Truth does that to you. Innocent, truthful people do not fear the existence of God. Mostly they fear all you nonbelievers might be correct and this physical life might be the sum total of our experience; that this is it.  It’s not.

 Barack Obama and his lawyers own this knowledge as they all claim they went to law school Obama_StatueofLibertyand church but I need to remind them and all the citizens: Not one federal judge has found Obama innocent and/or without fault. A March or April federal court ruling found a plaintiff’s lawyer ‘guilty’ of violating a rule. How does one cite rule when there is no longer any law? Federal judges are reduced to citing money and now technicalities to avoid adjudicating the point of law and the named punishment according to the exact words of US law. A federal judge should be able to cite the law if he or she had actual constitutional reasoning. I have yet to read a single federal ruling in which a sitting judge named the correct application of the law as the letter of the law is mostly ignored and spirit of the law is wholly ignored and even denied and in my case the entire text of both governing documents was ignored as was history and math. The act of crime perpetrated against Roberts thus the Constitution itself by Obama and his associates or by any person acting in Obama’s name? A similar act was perpetrated against a uniformed member of the US military serving in Iraq. The Chief Justice, a uniformed soldier and the paper Constitution has been directly attacked as have I; this then means war. This coup has now escalated to a war as these crimes, most especially the attack on the SCOTUS docket meant to injure Roberts, are overt acts of aggression and every single element needed to find, try and convict Obama, his lawyer Robert Bauer, several judges who acted for Obama by acting against the law and those who actually committed the crime guilty of treason and so sentence them to the death penalty. Obama confessed when he went on national TV and claimed to be the victim of cyber crime when it actual reality you have to be innocent or not at fault to then be an actual victim of an actual crime. This attack was meant to enthrone Obama not harm him. Puhleez. Anything done ‘to’ Obama is an act of self-defense, as Obama was never innocent and is at fault. HE HAD TO PARTICIPATE IF HIS NAME MADE IT ONTO THE BALLOT IN ALL 50 STATES AS HE NOT ONCE DENIED OR REFUSED THIS NOMINATION AND ACTIVELY PURSUED IT IN OPEN AND DIRECT VIOLATION OF OUR LAW. THEN HE ACCEPTED THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ILLEGAL, IMMORAL AND UNETHICAL COMMISSION. HE OBEYED AN UNJUST ORDER AS IT WAS PURCHASED AND HE DID THE PURCHASING BY USING PRIVATE MONEY. These events and acts would not be if not for Barack Obama exactly as he is the cause. The law makes no distinction between those who actually pull the trigger and those who create, cajole, incite, instigate, encourage and condone a crime; the person who is the cause then is subject to the same penalty as the person who pulls the trigger. If any of these people have reasoned I will stand idly by while they assault and batter uniformed soldiers, women or a SCOTUS employee they have made their most fatal error of all as the Creator can and may destroy energy. There is actually fate worse than death. There is fatal and then there’s most fatal. God reasons and decides that. Once you commit a direct act of physical aggression against the Constitution you have attacked the exactly named Creator; you have committed treason and you have met every element needed to sentence you to death as TREASON IS NAMED WITHIN OUR CONSTITUTION THUS IF YOU DIRECTLY ATTACK IT? IT CONSTITUTES TREASON. Duh. Thus a direct act is it. That’s the last element you must meet to then be sentenced to physical death. A person directly attacking the US Constitution is not only attacking the Creator but directly attacking the legal President, the sitting Chief Justice legal or not and so is attacking the people. You mean to disempower Roberts thus the people. No good can come of it – ever. I need to let Obama and Bauer know so they can never say they did not: The perpetrators and their named cause and/or causes had better hope a federal court or the Justice Department gets their hands on them before I do or before the citizens are informed their right to shoot has now fully vested.  Before you were assaulting the Constitution but now you have actually battered it. This actually constitutes a declaration of civil war, actual civil war.  This is where the paper begins defending its own self, as it is elegant, which is why the just always seem to win in spite of the odds and why the tide always seems to turn at the last second: It is the design of the universe revealing itself.  Our law respires and pulses exactly like the universe. The universe abolishes what is repugnant to it w/o human help.

I need to tell this court that I filed pre-emtively in the Supreme Court, as I may as the countdown begins 60 days after final judgment is entered or not at all. I suspected this court would not obey the law as I had all kinds of proof it would not. I had: Prior treatment, first person eyewitness testimony of the lawyers and the litigants that came before it and its own words and the facts  – all offices are unchecked thus this very court is unchecked. Only a judge not afraid of getting caught by the appellate aka the people uses money as a reason in a case of taxation without representation that already is as it is history thus is proven to be a fact before she states an exact lie to support her excuse: in bad faith. Slander, libel, defamation, blackmail and emotional assault and battery – exactly what I’m suing for as I named emotional distress for the breach of the contract and not abuse of judicial discretion, and she knew as I told her. It is a blatant demand for tribute and in case it is lost on Howard, “Millions for defense but not one cent for tribute!” was said at a banquet in John Marshall’s honor. I predicted what then happened to me as it constitutes a pattern and this physicist knows a pattern when she sees it, as the anomaly is a part of the pattern. We constitutionalists call it “unique treatment”. If Susan is anywhere near a court on paper or in person then the law is being broken and not by Susan but by the judge and other court officers. Hopefully this repeating pattern will end soon.

I do want the federal appellate’s opinion in regards to your [judiciary’s] own actions: As the federal court has now reasoned and decided several times over that the founders, the governing documents, the Iroquois Confederacy, Roman Catholicism, the magnetic North Pole, the Sundance, Europe, Asia, Africa, the PA, FL and NY State Constitutions, the Seneca Falls Women’s Rights Conference, matriarchal common X DNA, my person, the federal judiciary itself and exactly John Roberts himself as well as the exactly named Creator is “without any basis in fact or law”, does this mean I won my case against Roberts and the US but then lost it exactly like Marbury? as it seems as if I can’t reason the law if I do not exist or I cannot collect if I do not exist and/or cannot gain entry to a court in person if the US does not exist thus it seems as if I cannot act upon the knowledge of my victory. This is not true, fact or correct as my existence thus whether I act to collect is not a matter decided by your opinion as only I reason and decide that. None of the above exists or does not exist only as the federal judiciary rules it does not. But let’s pretend the federal judiciary does have the power of the Godhead thus can and does create and destroy energy: If John Roberts has no basis in either fact and law so is a dead institution according to several decisions and orders handed down by the federal judiciary, if I concede to that one point, are we all then agreeing that I won from a time before I ever set foot in any federal courthouse? My fact is his only basis is within the precedent I am creating this very moment as I author this suit, a precedent that is not your fact or so the federal judiciary said over and over. No wonder he could not file my paperwork  – according to the federal judiciary he does not exist! As I did not place the words “Chief Justice” before his name as my fact is he isn’t – yet – so he thus US law does not exist, do the actions of the federal judiciary then say we are all in agreement? Or after reading this does the federal judiciary  still truly believe there’s no basis in fact or law for US law? 

 If I think of anything else I will name it. I already gave a complete list to the FBI and other federal court and now some of that remedy and relief is no longer a need. I have discovered that people like believing in ideas like US law, the Koran and New Testament only when they are not true. If you prove it? Suddenly it is not possible. Even when you remind a federal judge that it cannot be both, that either US law is true or not but not only true for men or only true for dead men, or only true if it is not proven, which makes no sense whatsoever, they insist that they can deny reality yet then be actual true believers. That’s not faith! How can you deny the truth and yet be a true believer? How can you act as a federal judge if you do not truly believe in US law? You can’t; you may not. You’re either a true believer or a believer and they are not the same. Believers? They are gullible and how. Their words and actions do not constitute law. What exactly does an untrue believer then believe in? I’ve answered some difficult questions in my time but this one has me stumped.

 What is so scary about being proven? Why do the unethical seek to suppress the truth? Why is SUSAN HERBERT perceived to be such a big threat? Once something is proven you cannot arbitrarily change it or amend it and people then have to actually live up to what they say they truly believe.You cannot lie, cheat and steal anymore and get away with it once the people know Marbury rules.