Executive Order
Recommendation, Decision, Order and Judgment
This is an Executive Order and
should be considered as such; as this order carries the same weight as the
order of a Commanding officer during a time of actual war which this is
failure to obey, uphold and enforce the Declaration and Constitution of the US
in spite of your personal beliefs and fears will be a treasonous action on your
part as I am wholly and absolutely standing upon US law and all prior federal
precedent most especially Marbury V Madison
as well as chain of command theory. I am the test of Marbury
thus this is your test as I have passed my own as proven by this very order.
This Federal Appeals Court is hereby ordered to choose one of the following:
- Hear this case in person with an order
against Obama and Roberts compelling them to appear in person and upon a
finding of all lower court judgments against my person unconstitutional
and in open and direct violation of the Declaration and Constitution as
every one of them is arbitrary and capricious and is nothing more than
blatant discrimination of my person, a claim which is supported to the
level of proof by this very Brief and by the Supreme Court’s own docket
OR;
- Send this case to the appropriate venue, the
Supreme Court of the United States which then is the people, with an order
to hear it in person via the granting of oral argument and based upon a finding
of fact that direct entry already occurred but filing or delivery
of the paper did not thus Marbury is
violated, my right to redress is violated, the recent election is in
direct and open violation of the terms and those terms were violated
without due process or without a ¾ majority vote of Congress and that the
people were circumvented or denied informed consent as no response ever
came from the Solicitor General who is to represent their interests and so
the only remedy and relief available is to then grant said original
jurisdiction case oral argument as the people cannot then act in their own
defense if they do not know. The purpose of this order is to inform
the people. It is not a finding of guilt or innocence.
The wording of the execution of
one of these choices is up to this court’s discretion. Not hearing this case in
person, either in this court or in the Supreme Court, is not one of
this court’s choices.
In this most extraordinary of all
cases the contract known as
For all of these reasons as there
is only one as constitutional authority is within our law and Marbury, my children will be returned, damages will
be awarded, all my remedy and relief will be granted and the decisions and
judgments against me will be overturned and/or tossed in the wastebasket.
We have had the Slaughterhouse
Cases. Now we will have the Proof of Life Cases.
Susan Herbert,
The acting, legal President and
Commander in Chief, as I am,
As my will, my one vote, the
equal protection and due process clauses and Marbury
make it so.