About Federal Appeal 09-10661-C
American law is contract law. As of 11/20/08 the US is in breach of both governing documents as life or acting and not paper is proof in any actual constitutional nation. Null and voiding the entire federal government is easier than you think as it is a matter of doing exactly what John Marshall said to do: Act upon ownership of the knowledge as your commission exists and is hanging on the wall of a national museum paid for with your tax dollars thus it not only exists but it has been delivered. The only possible way an American can fail is to never make the attempt. (See SCOTUS docket #08-6622 as the 11/20/08 action is not the same as the petition numbered 08-6622; 11/20/08 & In Re Susan # 08-6622 are two different filings).
So, how do you void a repugnant and insufferable form of government? Decide you can and may so you then act to author a pro se case of constitutional authority and original jurisdiction thus claim your right to enter SCOTUS directly by doing it, enter directly on paper first, and then to appear in person thus dissolving the insufferable form – the discrimination of women and of you alone – by suing John Roberts and the SCOTUS clerks when they act upon your emergency application but fail to file the paper thus deny the people informed consent and treat you uniquely or: unlike the man William Marbury as your case is then Marbury V Madison over again only for women and children. It’s not legal to deny any authority case an appearance in person if it is brought by a member of the injured class be it a class of one or a class of millions as once you deny living people entry to then redress the violation of a fully vested right you have died as you have chosen something such as personal belief , meaningless action for the sake of appearances only thus undue process as it is injurious or illogical rule over the Constitution. Choosing unfit and unjust persons over an able, capable and ethical woman ONLY as they are male, are gay, are black or are willing to violate the law and/or skirt the rules? Unconstitutional. Only women give birth to living constitutions aka human babies yet women are not allowed to violate or disobey unjust orders issued by men or to disobey or act against mostly male bodies of government; men use force against women to then force them to comply when we are supposed to be a nation of volunteers and Marbury states we must disobey or be held liable. Force can be actual violence or it can be perceived forms of power such as money or mass media conditioning wielded as a weapon. Force is anything used to entrench injustice and it is meant or expressly designed to disempower the victim against the victims will. BVG and Obama 08 are forced upon me against my will and both are unjust for actual constitutional or legal reasoning. Barack Obama could be any person man or woman or any color as my argument is about enforcing, upholding and obeying the law; if you violated the law or made yourself an exception to the rules? My suit is agaisnt you.
Anybody can become Chief Justice or President – even a woman. Fear or self-doubt? Sorry fellas but fear is unconstitutional thus you are unconstitutional as you were all too afraid to argue this case but I was not and am not as I do not hide behind paper of any kind. See Bush and Gore. You can install, appoint or elect a MAN willing to violate US law and who will commit treason to secure the office – steal power – and who does not have the human ability to apply the law to women correctly or justly but if you do? You may not; I’m suing as my one vote levels the playing field but my will, my moral authority, gives me all the actual advantage.
I held all 300 million of you liable for damages as you caused Bush V Gore which in turn caused Obama 08. You also caused Federal Appeal 09-10661-C, Herbert V Obama, Roberts and the US aka Judicial Review Is The Myth Of Fingerprints. The legal gold begins on page 60. For the pages preceding page 60 ”Jurisdiction”, “Nature of Case”, “Proceedings So Far” and “Fact” as they are not included here and for a copy of the original SCOTUS petition and the emergency application go to Scribd. Here’s a link to the whole case: Herbert-V-Obama-Federal-Appeal-0910661C. This blog is the condensed version and is your notice of suit if you have ignored the SCOTUS docket. Your clue is: IGNORANCE, ESPECIALLY DELIBERATE IGNORANCE, IS NOT AN EXCUSE IN THE EYES OF THE LAW. IF YOU VOTED YOU ARE NOT IGNORANT OF THE FACT US LAW EXISTS. YOU KNOW.
Deliberation, knowing but doing it anyways or I can so I will, is however a means to sue you for liability. Read on…